SVM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hecla Mining Co. has a net margin of -2.28% compared to Silvercorp Metals, Inc.'s net margin of 24.6%. Silvercorp Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.55% beat Hecla Mining Co.'s return on equity of 9.13%.

Silvercorp Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.4%. On the other hand Hecla Mining Co. has an analysts' consensus of $26.65 which suggests that it could grow by 17.92%. Given that Silvercorp Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hecla Mining Co., analysts believe Silvercorp Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Hecla Mining Co..

Silvercorp Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.751% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hecla Mining Co. has a beta of 1.254, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.383%.

Silvercorp Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. Hecla Mining Co. offers a yield of 0.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Silvercorp Metals, Inc. pays 8.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Hecla Mining Co. pays out 70.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Silvercorp Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $126.1M, which are smaller than Hecla Mining Co. quarterly revenues of $409.5M. Silvercorp Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$2.9M is lower than Hecla Mining Co.'s net income of $100.7M. Notably, Silvercorp Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 95.40x while Hecla Mining Co.'s PE ratio is 74.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Silvercorp Metals, Inc. is 6.58x versus 11.89x for Hecla Mining Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Horizon Copper Corp. has a net margin of -2.28% compared to Silvercorp Metals, Inc.'s net margin of -748.53%. Silvercorp Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.55% beat Horizon Copper Corp.'s return on equity of -486.91%.

Silvercorp Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.4%. On the other hand Horizon Copper Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Silvercorp Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than Horizon Copper Corp., analysts believe Silvercorp Metals, Inc. is more attractive than Horizon Copper Corp..

Silvercorp Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.751% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Horizon Copper Corp. has a beta of 0.475, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.533%.

Silvercorp Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. Horizon Copper Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Silvercorp Metals, Inc. pays 8.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Horizon Copper Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silvercorp Metals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Silvercorp Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $126.1M, which are larger than Horizon Copper Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.5M. Silvercorp Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$2.9M is higher than Horizon Copper Corp.'s net income of -$26.1M. Notably, Silvercorp Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 95.40x while Horizon Copper Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Silvercorp Metals, Inc. is 6.58x versus 10.42x for Horizon Copper Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen, Inc. has a net margin of -2.28% compared to Silvercorp Metals, Inc.'s net margin of -0.91%. Silvercorp Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.55% beat McEwen, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.43%.

Silvercorp Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.4%. On the other hand McEwen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $27.30 which suggests that it could grow by 6.18%. Given that Silvercorp Metals, Inc. has higher upside potential than McEwen, Inc., analysts believe Silvercorp Metals, Inc. is more attractive than McEwen, Inc..

Silvercorp Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.751% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen, Inc. has a beta of 1.127, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.677%.

Silvercorp Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. McEwen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Silvercorp Metals, Inc. pays 8.73% of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silvercorp Metals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Silvercorp Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $126.1M, which are larger than McEwen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.5M. Silvercorp Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$2.9M is lower than McEwen, Inc.'s net income of -$462K. Notably, Silvercorp Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 95.40x while McEwen, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Silvercorp Metals, Inc. is 6.58x versus 8.28x for McEwen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of -2.28% compared to Silvercorp Metals, Inc.'s net margin of --. Silvercorp Metals, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.55% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.

Silvercorp Metals, Inc. has a consensus price target of $13.00, signalling upside risk potential of 18.4%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $60.49 which suggests that it could grow by 77.86%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than Silvercorp Metals, Inc., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than Silvercorp Metals, Inc..

Silvercorp Metals, Inc. has a beta of 0.972, which suggesting that the stock is 2.751% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.807, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.253%.

Silvercorp Metals, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Silvercorp Metals, Inc. pays 8.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silvercorp Metals, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Silvercorp Metals, Inc. quarterly revenues are $126.1M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Silvercorp Metals, Inc.'s net income of -$2.9M is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Silvercorp Metals, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 95.40x while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Silvercorp Metals, Inc. is 6.58x versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.