PRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bar Harbor Bankshares has a net margin of 27.77% compared to Park National's net margin of 31.58%. Park National's return on equity of 11.8% beat Bar Harbor Bankshares's return on equity of 9.79%.

Park National has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.28%. On the other hand Bar Harbor Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $28.25 which suggests that it could grow by 10.45%. Given that Bar Harbor Bankshares has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Bar Harbor Bankshares is more attractive than Park National.

Park National has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.154% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bar Harbor Bankshares has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.497%.

Park National has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Bar Harbor Bankshares offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Park National pays 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Bar Harbor Bankshares pays out 36.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park National quarterly revenues are $137.6M, which are larger than Bar Harbor Bankshares quarterly revenues of $38.6M. Park National's net income of $38.2M is higher than Bar Harbor Bankshares's net income of $12.2M. Notably, Park National's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.54x while Bar Harbor Bankshares's PE ratio is 11.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park National is 5.67x versus 3.21x for Bar Harbor Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a net margin of 27.77% compared to Park National's net margin of 4.33%. Park National's return on equity of 11.8% beat Blue Ridge Bankshares's return on equity of -7.9%.

Park National has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.28%. On the other hand Blue Ridge Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park National has higher upside potential than Blue Ridge Bankshares, analysts believe Park National is more attractive than Blue Ridge Bankshares.

Park National has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.154% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Ridge Bankshares has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.548%.

Park National has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Blue Ridge Bankshares offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park National pays 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Ridge Bankshares pays out -8.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park National quarterly revenues are $137.6M, which are larger than Blue Ridge Bankshares quarterly revenues of $21.8M. Park National's net income of $38.2M is higher than Blue Ridge Bankshares's net income of $946K. Notably, Park National's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.54x while Blue Ridge Bankshares's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park National is 5.67x versus 1.26x for Blue Ridge Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 27.77% compared to Park National's net margin of 16.32%. Park National's return on equity of 11.8% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Park National has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.28%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.57%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than Park National.

Park National has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.154% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.751%.

Park National has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Park National pays 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park National quarterly revenues are $137.6M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Park National's net income of $38.2M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Park National's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.54x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park National is 5.67x versus 2.91x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 27.77% compared to Park National's net margin of 24.66%. Park National's return on equity of 11.8% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 9.88%.

Park National has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 4.28%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19.63%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Park National.

Park National has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.154% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.720, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.046%.

Park National has a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.44%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Park National pays 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 363.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Tompkins Financial's is not.

Park National quarterly revenues are $137.6M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $75.6M. Park National's net income of $38.2M is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $18.6M. Notably, Park National's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.54x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 14.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park National is 5.67x versus 3.42x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.