NGD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coeur Mining, Inc. has a net margin of 31.35% compared to New Gold, Inc.'s net margin of 48.25%. New Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.98% beat Coeur Mining, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.79%.

New Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.04%. On the other hand Coeur Mining, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $21.29 which suggests that it could grow by 23.75%. Given that Coeur Mining, Inc. has higher upside potential than New Gold, Inc., analysts believe Coeur Mining, Inc. is more attractive than New Gold, Inc..

New Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.650, which suggesting that the stock is 34.998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coeur Mining, Inc. has a beta of 1.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.076%.

New Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coeur Mining, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coeur Mining, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

New Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $453.9M, which are smaller than Coeur Mining, Inc. quarterly revenues of $553.1M. New Gold, Inc.'s net income of $142.3M is lower than Coeur Mining, Inc.'s net income of $266.8M. Notably, New Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.66x while Coeur Mining, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Gold, Inc. is 5.37x versus 5.59x for Coeur Mining, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of 31.35% compared to New Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -27.31%. New Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.98% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.

New Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.04%. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.11 which suggests that it could grow by 28.32%. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than New Gold, Inc., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than New Gold, Inc..

New Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.650, which suggesting that the stock is 34.998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

New Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. New Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

New Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $453.9M, which are larger than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. New Gold, Inc.'s net income of $142.3M is higher than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, New Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.66x while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Gold, Inc. is 5.37x versus 46.92x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McEwen, Inc. has a net margin of 31.35% compared to New Gold, Inc.'s net margin of -0.91%. New Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.98% beat McEwen, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.43%.

New Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.04%. On the other hand McEwen, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $22.60 which suggests that it could grow by 18.64%. Given that McEwen, Inc. has higher upside potential than New Gold, Inc., analysts believe McEwen, Inc. is more attractive than New Gold, Inc..

New Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.650, which suggesting that the stock is 34.998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McEwen, Inc. has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.347%.

New Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. McEwen, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. McEwen, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

New Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $453.9M, which are larger than McEwen, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.5M. New Gold, Inc.'s net income of $142.3M is higher than McEwen, Inc.'s net income of -$462K. Notably, New Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.66x while McEwen, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Gold, Inc. is 5.37x versus 6.14x for McEwen, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a net margin of 31.35% compared to New Gold, Inc.'s net margin of --. New Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.98% beat Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s return on equity of -5.31%.

New Gold, Inc. has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 8.04%. On the other hand Seabridge Gold, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $55.78 which suggests that it could grow by 91.17%. Given that Seabridge Gold, Inc. has higher upside potential than New Gold, Inc., analysts believe Seabridge Gold, Inc. is more attractive than New Gold, Inc..

New Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.650, which suggesting that the stock is 34.998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seabridge Gold, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.933%.

New Gold, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Seabridge Gold, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New Gold, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Seabridge Gold, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

New Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues are $453.9M, which are larger than Seabridge Gold, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. New Gold, Inc.'s net income of $142.3M is higher than Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s net income of -$23.4M. Notably, New Gold, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 26.66x while Seabridge Gold, Inc.'s PE ratio is 250.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Gold, Inc. is 5.37x versus -- for Seabridge Gold, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.