BEEP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LegalZoom.com has a net margin of -10.91% compared to Mobile Infrastructure's net margin of 2.8%. Mobile Infrastructure's return on equity of -2.9% beat LegalZoom.com's return on equity of 26.65%.

Mobile Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.7%. On the other hand LegalZoom.com has an analysts' consensus of $9.43 which suggests that it could grow by 4.41%. Given that Mobile Infrastructure has higher upside potential than LegalZoom.com, analysts believe Mobile Infrastructure is more attractive than LegalZoom.com.

Mobile Infrastructure has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LegalZoom.com has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mobile Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LegalZoom.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobile Infrastructure pays -168.12% of its earnings as a dividend. LegalZoom.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobile Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $9.2M, which are smaller than LegalZoom.com quarterly revenues of $183.1M. Mobile Infrastructure's net income of -$999K is lower than LegalZoom.com's net income of $5.1M. Notably, Mobile Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LegalZoom.com's PE ratio is 53.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobile Infrastructure is 3.54x versus 2.35x for LegalZoom.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Team has a net margin of -10.91% compared to Mobile Infrastructure's net margin of -3.37%. Mobile Infrastructure's return on equity of -2.9% beat Team's return on equity of -165.8%.

Mobile Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.7%. On the other hand Team has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 528.93%. Given that Team has higher upside potential than Mobile Infrastructure, analysts believe Team is more attractive than Mobile Infrastructure.

Mobile Infrastructure has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Team has a beta of 1.783, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.333%.

Mobile Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Team offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobile Infrastructure pays -168.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Team pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobile Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $9.2M, which are smaller than Team quarterly revenues of $213.3M. Mobile Infrastructure's net income of -$999K is higher than Team's net income of -$7.2M. Notably, Mobile Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Team's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobile Infrastructure is 3.54x versus 0.11x for Team. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UL Solutions has a net margin of -10.91% compared to Mobile Infrastructure's net margin of 9.5%. Mobile Infrastructure's return on equity of -2.9% beat UL Solutions's return on equity of 39.37%.

Mobile Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.7%. On the other hand UL Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $69.55 which suggests that it could fall by -0.88%. Given that Mobile Infrastructure has higher upside potential than UL Solutions, analysts believe Mobile Infrastructure is more attractive than UL Solutions.

Mobile Infrastructure has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UL Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mobile Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UL Solutions offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Mobile Infrastructure pays -168.12% of its earnings as a dividend. UL Solutions pays out 30.68% of its earnings as a dividend. UL Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mobile Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $9.2M, which are smaller than UL Solutions quarterly revenues of $705M. Mobile Infrastructure's net income of -$999K is lower than UL Solutions's net income of $67M. Notably, Mobile Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while UL Solutions's PE ratio is 42.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobile Infrastructure is 3.54x versus 4.87x for UL Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xometry has a net margin of -10.91% compared to Mobile Infrastructure's net margin of -9.99%. Mobile Infrastructure's return on equity of -2.9% beat Xometry's return on equity of -15.45%.

Mobile Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 46.7%. On the other hand Xometry has an analysts' consensus of $34.44 which suggests that it could grow by 12.93%. Given that Mobile Infrastructure has higher upside potential than Xometry, analysts believe Mobile Infrastructure is more attractive than Xometry.

Mobile Infrastructure has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xometry has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mobile Infrastructure has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xometry offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mobile Infrastructure pays -168.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Xometry pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mobile Infrastructure quarterly revenues are $9.2M, which are smaller than Xometry quarterly revenues of $151M. Mobile Infrastructure's net income of -$999K is higher than Xometry's net income of -$15.1M. Notably, Mobile Infrastructure's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xometry's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mobile Infrastructure is 3.54x versus 2.63x for Xometry. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.