Financhill
Sell
8

WLDS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$0.86
Seasonality move :
-18.17%
Day range:
$0.90 - $1.01
52-week range:
$0.83 - $11.40
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
2.25x
P/B ratio:
0.43x
Volume:
85K
Avg. volume:
327.5K
1-year change:
-70.62%
Market cap:
$4.9M
Revenue:
$522K
EPS (TTM):
-$25.66

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
WLDS
Wearable Devices Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
$156.8M $0.27 9.97% 23.44% $18.00
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
$779.9M $3.21 9.18% 30.54% $159.33
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
WLDS
Wearable Devices Ltd.
$0.90 -- $4.9M -- $0.00 0% 2.25x
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
$133.50 -- $2B 29.22x $0.52 1.83% 0.72x
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
$80.65 -- $1.9B 25.62x $0.31 1.78% 2.49x
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
$20.14 $18.00 $988.9M 24.80x $0.15 3.84% 1.64x
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
$1.13 -- $23M 8.08x $0.22 19.47% 1.18x
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
$110.97 $159.33 $6.9B 12.50x $0.00 0% 2.44x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
WLDS
Wearable Devices Ltd.
16.63% 10.697 -- 2.05x
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
45.09% 1.956 21.91% 0.94x
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
18.1% 0.385 4.16% 1.00x
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
25.78% 0.766 10.75% 1.37x
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
4.15% -0.778 4.29% 3.35x
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
2.2% 0.051 0.97% 1.19x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
WLDS
Wearable Devices Ltd.
-- -- -171.47% -213.31% -- --
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
$136.3M $54.8M 8.65% 12.6% 7.83% --
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
$47.7M $23.2M 17.7% 22.26% 10.89% $34.4M
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
$44.2M $17.3M 12.1% 15.76% 10.7% $19.9M
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
$2.6M $644K 12.49% 12.95% 13.35% $1.3M
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
$491.4M $170.2M 13.75% 15.48% 23.15% $164.5M

Wearable Devices Ltd. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns WLDS or FORTY?

    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net margin of 4.98%. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s return on equity of -213.31% beat Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.6%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    WLDS
    Wearable Devices Ltd.
    -- -- $4.6M
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
    19.48% $1.09 $2.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About WLDS or FORTY?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wearable Devices Ltd. has higher upside potential than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd., analysts believe Wearable Devices Ltd. is more attractive than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    WLDS
    Wearable Devices Ltd.
    0 0 0
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is WLDS or FORTY More Risky?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a beta of 1.057, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.735%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLDS or FORTY?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Wearable Devices Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. pays out 22.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios WLDS or FORTY?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. quarterly revenues of $699.9M. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s net income of $34.9M. Notably, Wearable Devices Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s PE ratio is 29.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wearable Devices Ltd. is 2.25x versus 0.72x for Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    WLDS
    Wearable Devices Ltd.
    2.25x -- -- --
    FORTY
    Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
    0.72x 29.22x $699.9M $34.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns WLDS or HLTEF?

    Hilan Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net margin of 7.82%. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s return on equity of -213.31% beat Hilan Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.26%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    WLDS
    Wearable Devices Ltd.
    -- -- $4.6M
    HLTEF
    Hilan Ltd.
    22.38% $0.71 $453.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About WLDS or HLTEF?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hilan Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wearable Devices Ltd. has higher upside potential than Hilan Ltd., analysts believe Wearable Devices Ltd. is more attractive than Hilan Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    WLDS
    Wearable Devices Ltd.
    0 0 0
    HLTEF
    Hilan Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is WLDS or HLTEF More Risky?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hilan Ltd. has a beta of -0.011, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.075%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLDS or HLTEF?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hilan Ltd. offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Wearable Devices Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hilan Ltd. pays out 27.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Hilan Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios WLDS or HLTEF?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hilan Ltd. quarterly revenues of $213.1M. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Hilan Ltd.'s net income of $16.7M. Notably, Wearable Devices Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hilan Ltd.'s PE ratio is 25.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wearable Devices Ltd. is 2.25x versus 2.49x for Hilan Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    WLDS
    Wearable Devices Ltd.
    2.25x -- -- --
    HLTEF
    Hilan Ltd.
    2.49x 25.62x $213.1M $16.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns WLDS or MGIC?

    Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net margin of 7.39%. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s return on equity of -213.31% beat Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.76%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    WLDS
    Wearable Devices Ltd.
    -- -- $4.6M
    MGIC
    Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
    27.35% $0.20 $396.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About WLDS or MGIC?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could fall by -10.63%. Given that Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has higher upside potential than Wearable Devices Ltd., analysts believe Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. is more attractive than Wearable Devices Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    WLDS
    Wearable Devices Ltd.
    0 0 0
    MGIC
    Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
    0 1 0
  • Is WLDS or MGIC More Risky?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has a beta of 0.725, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.526%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLDS or MGIC?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Wearable Devices Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. pays out 58.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios WLDS or MGIC?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. quarterly revenues of $161.7M. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s net income of $12M. Notably, Wearable Devices Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s PE ratio is 24.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wearable Devices Ltd. is 2.25x versus 1.64x for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    WLDS
    Wearable Devices Ltd.
    2.25x -- -- --
    MGIC
    Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
    1.64x 24.80x $161.7M $12M
  • Which has Higher Returns WLDS or MNDO?

    MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net margin of 14.12%. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s return on equity of -213.31% beat MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.95%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    WLDS
    Wearable Devices Ltd.
    -- -- $4.6M
    MNDO
    MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
    52.93% $0.03 $23.1M
  • What do Analysts Say About WLDS or MNDO?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wearable Devices Ltd. has higher upside potential than MIND C.T.I. Ltd., analysts believe Wearable Devices Ltd. is more attractive than MIND C.T.I. Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    WLDS
    Wearable Devices Ltd.
    0 0 0
    MNDO
    MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is WLDS or MNDO More Risky?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has a beta of 0.585, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.497%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLDS or MNDO?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MIND C.T.I. Ltd. offers a yield of 19.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Wearable Devices Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MIND C.T.I. Ltd. pays out 106.67% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios WLDS or MNDO?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MIND C.T.I. Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s net income of $681K. Notably, Wearable Devices Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wearable Devices Ltd. is 2.25x versus 1.18x for MIND C.T.I. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    WLDS
    Wearable Devices Ltd.
    2.25x -- -- --
    MNDO
    MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
    1.18x 8.08x $4.8M $681K
  • Which has Higher Returns WLDS or NICE?

    NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a net margin of -- compared to Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net margin of 19.79%. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s return on equity of -213.31% beat NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s return on equity of 15.48%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    WLDS
    Wearable Devices Ltd.
    -- -- $4.6M
    NICE
    NICE Ltd. (Israel)
    66.81% $2.30 $3.9B
  • What do Analysts Say About WLDS or NICE?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NICE Ltd. (Israel) has an analysts' consensus of $159.33 which suggests that it could grow by 43.58%. Given that NICE Ltd. (Israel) has higher upside potential than Wearable Devices Ltd., analysts believe NICE Ltd. (Israel) is more attractive than Wearable Devices Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    WLDS
    Wearable Devices Ltd.
    0 0 0
    NICE
    NICE Ltd. (Israel)
    7 6 0
  • Is WLDS or NICE More Risky?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a beta of 0.958, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.175%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLDS or NICE?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NICE Ltd. (Israel) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wearable Devices Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NICE Ltd. (Israel) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios WLDS or NICE?

    Wearable Devices Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NICE Ltd. (Israel) quarterly revenues of $735.4M. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s net income of $145.5M. Notably, Wearable Devices Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s PE ratio is 12.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wearable Devices Ltd. is 2.25x versus 2.44x for NICE Ltd. (Israel). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    WLDS
    Wearable Devices Ltd.
    2.25x -- -- --
    NICE
    NICE Ltd. (Israel)
    2.44x 12.50x $735.4M $145.5M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?

Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…

Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?

Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…

Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…

Stock Ideas

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x

Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
40
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x

Alerts

Buy
91
TDC alert for Feb 12

Teradata Corp. [TDC] is down 10.67% over the past day.

Buy
67
DIOD alert for Feb 12

Diodes, Inc. [DIOD] is down 7.04% over the past day.

Buy
77
VRT alert for Feb 12

Vertiv Holdings Co. [VRT] is down 4.72% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock