Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Sell
29
WLDS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.97
Seasonality move
:
-4.38%
Day range:
$1.88 - $1.99
52-week range:
$1.00 - $11.40
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
4.88x
P/B ratio:
0.43x
Volume:
366.7K
Avg. volume:
453.8K
1-year change:
-68.83%
Market cap:
$10.6M
Revenue:
$522K
EPS (TTM):
-$25.66
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WLDS
Wearable Devices Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
$154.8M | $0.27 | 9.97% | 29.45% | $18.00 |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
|
$729M | $3.17 | 7.23% | 107.66% | $164.00 |
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $8.00 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WLDS
Wearable Devices Ltd.
|
$1.95 | -- | $10.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 4.88x |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
$168.90 | -- | $2.6B | 37.00x | $0.52 | 1.14% | 0.92x |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
$25.23 | $18.00 | $1.2B | 32.22x | $0.30 | 3.41% | 2.12x |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
$1.22 | -- | $24.8M | 8.73x | $0.22 | 18.03% | 1.28x |
|
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
|
$107.67 | $164.00 | $6.6B | 12.13x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.37x |
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
$1.05 | $8.00 | $5.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.99x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WLDS
Wearable Devices Ltd.
|
16.63% | 8.200 | -- | 2.05x |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
45.09% | 1.800 | 21.91% | 0.94x |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
26% | 0.995 | 10.18% | 1.47x |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
4.15% | -0.678 | 4.29% | 3.35x |
|
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
|
2.2% | 0.264 | 0.97% | 1.19x |
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
-- | 0.122 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WLDS
Wearable Devices Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -171.47% | -213.31% | -- | -- |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
$136.3M | $54.8M | 8.65% | 12.6% | 7.83% | -- |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
$44.2M | $17.3M | 11.75% | 15.28% | 10.4% | $5.6M |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
$2.6M | $644K | 12.49% | 12.95% | 13.35% | $1.3M |
|
NICE
NICE Ltd. (Israel)
|
$491.4M | $170.2M | 13.75% | 15.48% | 23.15% | $164.5M |
|
SYNX
Silynxcom Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Wearable Devices Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns WLDS or FORTY?
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net margin of 4.98%. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s return on equity of -213.31% beat Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.6%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.-- -- $4.6M FORTYFormula Systems (1985) Ltd.19.48% $1.09 $2.2B -
What do Analysts Say About WLDS or FORTY?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wearable Devices Ltd. has higher upside potential than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd., analysts believe Wearable Devices Ltd. is more attractive than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.0 0 0 FORTYFormula Systems (1985) Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is WLDS or FORTY More Risky?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a beta of 1.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.377%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLDS or FORTY?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Wearable Devices Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. pays out 22.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLDS or FORTY?
Wearable Devices Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. quarterly revenues of $699.9M. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s net income of $34.9M. Notably, Wearable Devices Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s PE ratio is 37.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wearable Devices Ltd. is 4.88x versus 0.92x for Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.4.88x -- -- -- FORTYFormula Systems (1985) Ltd.0.92x 37.00x $699.9M $34.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns WLDS or MGIC?
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net margin of 7.54%. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s return on equity of -213.31% beat Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.28%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.-- -- $4.6M MGICMagic Software Enterprises Ltd.27.94% $0.20 $400.3M -
What do Analysts Say About WLDS or MGIC?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could fall by -28.66%. Given that Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has higher upside potential than Wearable Devices Ltd., analysts believe Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. is more attractive than Wearable Devices Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.0 0 0 MGICMagic Software Enterprises Ltd.0 1 0 -
Is WLDS or MGIC More Risky?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has a beta of 0.711, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.91%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLDS or MGIC?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Wearable Devices Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. pays out 58.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLDS or MGIC?
Wearable Devices Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. quarterly revenues of $161.7M. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s net income of $12M. Notably, Wearable Devices Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s PE ratio is 32.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wearable Devices Ltd. is 4.88x versus 2.12x for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.4.88x -- -- -- MGICMagic Software Enterprises Ltd.2.12x 32.22x $161.7M $12M
-
Which has Higher Returns WLDS or MNDO?
MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net margin of 14.12%. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s return on equity of -213.31% beat MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.95%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.-- -- $4.6M MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd.52.93% $0.03 $23.1M -
What do Analysts Say About WLDS or MNDO?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wearable Devices Ltd. has higher upside potential than MIND C.T.I. Ltd., analysts believe Wearable Devices Ltd. is more attractive than MIND C.T.I. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.0 0 0 MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is WLDS or MNDO More Risky?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has a beta of 0.602, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.776%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLDS or MNDO?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MIND C.T.I. Ltd. offers a yield of 18.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Wearable Devices Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MIND C.T.I. Ltd. pays out 106.67% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLDS or MNDO?
Wearable Devices Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MIND C.T.I. Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s net income of $681K. Notably, Wearable Devices Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wearable Devices Ltd. is 4.88x versus 1.28x for MIND C.T.I. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.4.88x -- -- -- MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd.1.28x 8.73x $4.8M $681K
-
Which has Higher Returns WLDS or NICE?
NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a net margin of -- compared to Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net margin of 19.79%. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s return on equity of -213.31% beat NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s return on equity of 15.48%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.-- -- $4.6M NICENICE Ltd. (Israel)66.81% $2.30 $3.9B -
What do Analysts Say About WLDS or NICE?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NICE Ltd. (Israel) has an analysts' consensus of $164.00 which suggests that it could grow by 52.32%. Given that NICE Ltd. (Israel) has higher upside potential than Wearable Devices Ltd., analysts believe NICE Ltd. (Israel) is more attractive than Wearable Devices Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.0 0 0 NICENICE Ltd. (Israel)8 5 0 -
Is WLDS or NICE More Risky?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NICE Ltd. (Israel) has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.182%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLDS or NICE?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NICE Ltd. (Israel) offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wearable Devices Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NICE Ltd. (Israel) pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLDS or NICE?
Wearable Devices Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NICE Ltd. (Israel) quarterly revenues of $735.4M. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s net income of $145.5M. Notably, Wearable Devices Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NICE Ltd. (Israel)'s PE ratio is 12.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wearable Devices Ltd. is 4.88x versus 2.37x for NICE Ltd. (Israel). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.4.88x -- -- -- NICENICE Ltd. (Israel)2.37x 12.13x $735.4M $145.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns WLDS or SYNX?
Silynxcom Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net margin of --. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s return on equity of -213.31% beat Silynxcom Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.-- -- $4.6M SYNXSilynxcom Ltd.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About WLDS or SYNX?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Silynxcom Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 661.91%. Given that Silynxcom Ltd. has higher upside potential than Wearable Devices Ltd., analysts believe Silynxcom Ltd. is more attractive than Wearable Devices Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.0 0 0 SYNXSilynxcom Ltd.1 0 0 -
Is WLDS or SYNX More Risky?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silynxcom Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLDS or SYNX?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Silynxcom Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wearable Devices Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silynxcom Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLDS or SYNX?
Wearable Devices Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Silynxcom Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Silynxcom Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Wearable Devices Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Silynxcom Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wearable Devices Ltd. is 4.88x versus 0.99x for Silynxcom Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.4.88x -- -- -- SYNXSilynxcom Ltd.0.99x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
63
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
44
PSTG alert for Dec 5
Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.
Sell
15
HOV alert for Dec 5
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 22.58% over the past day.
Buy
69
ASTS alert for Dec 5
AST Spacemobile, Inc. [ASTS] is up 18.25% over the past day.
