Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
3
WLDS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.74
Seasonality move
:
-18.17%
Day range:
$0.69 - $0.77
52-week range:
$0.69 - $11.40
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
1.81x
P/B ratio:
0.43x
Volume:
159.8K
Avg. volume:
231.4K
1-year change:
-78.12%
Market cap:
$6.2M
Revenue:
$522K
EPS (TTM):
-$25.66
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WLDS
Wearable Devices Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESYL
Easylink Solutions Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
$156.8M | $0.25 | 9.97% | 29.53% | $18.00 |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WLDS
Wearable Devices Ltd.
|
$0.72 | -- | $6.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.81x |
|
ESYL
Easylink Solutions Corp.
|
$0.0124 | -- | $69.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
$117.13 | -- | $1.8B | 25.63x | $0.52 | 2.09% | 0.63x |
|
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
|
$80.65 | -- | $1.9B | 25.62x | $0.31 | 1.79% | 2.49x |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
$17.38 | $18.00 | $853.3M | 21.40x | $0.15 | 4.45% | 1.41x |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
$1.22 | -- | $24.8M | 8.73x | $0.22 | 18.03% | 1.28x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WLDS
Wearable Devices Ltd.
|
16.63% | 10.617 | -- | 2.05x |
|
ESYL
Easylink Solutions Corp.
|
-- | -1.844 | -- | -- |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
45.09% | 2.666 | 21.91% | 0.94x |
|
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
|
18.1% | 0.622 | 4.16% | 1.00x |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
25.78% | 1.321 | 10.75% | 1.37x |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
4.15% | -0.908 | 4.29% | 3.35x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WLDS
Wearable Devices Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -171.47% | -213.31% | -- | -- |
|
ESYL
Easylink Solutions Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
$136.3M | $54.8M | 8.65% | 12.6% | 7.83% | -- |
|
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
|
$47.7M | $23.2M | 17.7% | 22.26% | 10.89% | $34.4M |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
$44.2M | $17.3M | 12.1% | 15.76% | 10.7% | $19.9M |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
$2.6M | $644K | 12.49% | 12.95% | 13.35% | $1.3M |
Wearable Devices Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns WLDS or ESYL?
Easylink Solutions Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net margin of --. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s return on equity of -213.31% beat Easylink Solutions Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.-- -- $4.6M ESYLEasylink Solutions Corp.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About WLDS or ESYL?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Easylink Solutions Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wearable Devices Ltd. has higher upside potential than Easylink Solutions Corp., analysts believe Wearable Devices Ltd. is more attractive than Easylink Solutions Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.0 0 0 ESYLEasylink Solutions Corp.0 0 0 -
Is WLDS or ESYL More Risky?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Easylink Solutions Corp. has a beta of 0.663, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.703%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLDS or ESYL?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Easylink Solutions Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Wearable Devices Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Easylink Solutions Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLDS or ESYL?
Wearable Devices Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Easylink Solutions Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Easylink Solutions Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Wearable Devices Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Easylink Solutions Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wearable Devices Ltd. is 1.81x versus -- for Easylink Solutions Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.1.81x -- -- -- ESYLEasylink Solutions Corp.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns WLDS or FORTY?
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net margin of 4.98%. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s return on equity of -213.31% beat Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.6%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.-- -- $4.6M FORTYFormula Systems (1985) Ltd.19.48% $1.09 $2.2B -
What do Analysts Say About WLDS or FORTY?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wearable Devices Ltd. has higher upside potential than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd., analysts believe Wearable Devices Ltd. is more attractive than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.0 0 0 FORTYFormula Systems (1985) Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is WLDS or FORTY More Risky?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a beta of 1.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.295%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLDS or FORTY?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Wearable Devices Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. pays out 22.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLDS or FORTY?
Wearable Devices Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. quarterly revenues of $699.9M. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s net income of $34.9M. Notably, Wearable Devices Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s PE ratio is 25.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wearable Devices Ltd. is 1.81x versus 0.63x for Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.1.81x -- -- -- FORTYFormula Systems (1985) Ltd.0.63x 25.63x $699.9M $34.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns WLDS or HLTEF?
Hilan Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net margin of 7.82%. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s return on equity of -213.31% beat Hilan Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.-- -- $4.6M HLTEFHilan Ltd.22.38% $0.71 $453.7M -
What do Analysts Say About WLDS or HLTEF?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hilan Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wearable Devices Ltd. has higher upside potential than Hilan Ltd., analysts believe Wearable Devices Ltd. is more attractive than Hilan Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.0 0 0 HLTEFHilan Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is WLDS or HLTEF More Risky?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hilan Ltd. has a beta of -0.007, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.704%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLDS or HLTEF?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hilan Ltd. offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Wearable Devices Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hilan Ltd. pays out 27.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Hilan Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLDS or HLTEF?
Wearable Devices Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hilan Ltd. quarterly revenues of $213.1M. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Hilan Ltd.'s net income of $16.7M. Notably, Wearable Devices Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hilan Ltd.'s PE ratio is 25.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wearable Devices Ltd. is 1.81x versus 2.49x for Hilan Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.1.81x -- -- -- HLTEFHilan Ltd.2.49x 25.62x $213.1M $16.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns WLDS or MGIC?
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net margin of 7.39%. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s return on equity of -213.31% beat Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.-- -- $4.6M MGICMagic Software Enterprises Ltd.27.35% $0.20 $396.7M -
What do Analysts Say About WLDS or MGIC?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.57%. Given that Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has higher upside potential than Wearable Devices Ltd., analysts believe Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. is more attractive than Wearable Devices Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.0 0 0 MGICMagic Software Enterprises Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is WLDS or MGIC More Risky?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has a beta of 0.790, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.03%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLDS or MGIC?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. offers a yield of 4.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Wearable Devices Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. pays out 58.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLDS or MGIC?
Wearable Devices Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. quarterly revenues of $161.7M. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s net income of $12M. Notably, Wearable Devices Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s PE ratio is 21.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wearable Devices Ltd. is 1.81x versus 1.41x for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.1.81x -- -- -- MGICMagic Software Enterprises Ltd.1.41x 21.40x $161.7M $12M
-
Which has Higher Returns WLDS or MNDO?
MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net margin of 14.12%. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s return on equity of -213.31% beat MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.95%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.-- -- $4.6M MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd.52.93% $0.03 $23.1M -
What do Analysts Say About WLDS or MNDO?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Wearable Devices Ltd. has higher upside potential than MIND C.T.I. Ltd., analysts believe Wearable Devices Ltd. is more attractive than MIND C.T.I. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.0 0 0 MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is WLDS or MNDO More Risky?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has a beta of 0.544, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.619%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock WLDS or MNDO?
Wearable Devices Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MIND C.T.I. Ltd. offers a yield of 18.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Wearable Devices Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MIND C.T.I. Ltd. pays out 106.67% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios WLDS or MNDO?
Wearable Devices Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MIND C.T.I. Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Wearable Devices Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s net income of $681K. Notably, Wearable Devices Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Wearable Devices Ltd. is 1.81x versus 1.28x for MIND C.T.I. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income WLDSWearable Devices Ltd.1.81x -- -- -- MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd.1.28x 8.73x $4.8M $681K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 3.64% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 5.43% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is down 1.4% over the past day.
