WHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a net margin of -3.49% compared to WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.'s net margin of 32.75%. WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.51% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 27.16%.

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.33, signalling upside risk potential of 11.26%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc., analysts believe WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc..

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. has a beta of 0.565, which suggesting that the stock is 43.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.839, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.053%.

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.56%. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. offers a yield of 5.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.50 per share. WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. pays 329.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. pays out 38.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.'s is not.

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.9M, which are smaller than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $41.4M. WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.'s net income of -$556K is lower than Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s net income of $13.6M. Notably, WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.66x while Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. is 4.28x versus 2.02x for Diamond Hill Investment Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gladstone Investment Corp. has a net margin of -3.49% compared to WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.'s net margin of -616.21%. WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.51% beat Gladstone Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 18.81%.

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.33, signalling upside risk potential of 11.26%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $14.13 which suggests that it could grow by 1.11%. Given that WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment Corp., analysts believe WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. is more attractive than Gladstone Investment Corp..

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. has a beta of 0.565, which suggesting that the stock is 43.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.408%.

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.56%. Gladstone Investment Corp. offers a yield of 6.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. pays 329.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment Corp. pays out 53.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.'s is not.

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.9M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment Corp. quarterly revenues of -$4.7M. WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.'s net income of -$556K is lower than Gladstone Investment Corp.'s net income of $28.7M. Notably, WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.66x while Gladstone Investment Corp.'s PE ratio is 5.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. is 4.28x versus 5.86x for Gladstone Investment Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of -3.49% compared to WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.'s net margin of 43.19%. WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.51% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 7.18%.

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.33, signalling upside risk potential of 11.26%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $12.91 which suggests that it could grow by 5.7%. Given that WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. has a beta of 0.565, which suggesting that the stock is 43.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.737, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.339%.

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.56%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 12.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. pays 329.91% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 119.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.9M, which are smaller than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $63.6M. WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.'s net income of -$556K is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $27.5M. Notably, WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.66x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 11.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. is 4.28x versus 4.80x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a net margin of -3.49% compared to WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.'s net margin of 29.17%. WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.'s return on equity of 3.51% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s return on equity of 2.31%.

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. has a consensus price target of $8.33, signalling upside risk potential of 11.26%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.70 which suggests that it could grow by 0.07%. Given that WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp., analysts believe WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp..

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. has a beta of 0.565, which suggesting that the stock is 43.492% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.325%.

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.56%. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. offers a yield of 12.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. pays 329.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. pays out 444.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. quarterly revenues are $15.9M, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. quarterly revenues of $84.3M. WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.'s net income of -$556K is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s net income of $24.6M. Notably, WhiteHorse Finance, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.66x while Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s PE ratio is 35.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. is 4.28x versus 3.93x for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.