UCAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to U Power Ltd.'s net margin of 6.1%. U Power Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.93% beat China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.53%.

U Power Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 119.78%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 80.72%. Given that U Power Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Automotive Systems, Inc., analysts believe U Power Ltd. is more attractive than China Automotive Systems, Inc..

U Power Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.83%.

U Power Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. U Power Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

U Power Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Automotive Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $193.2M. U Power Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s net income of $11.8M. Notably, U Power Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Automotive Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 3.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U Power Ltd. is 0.96x versus 0.17x for China Automotive Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H World Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to U Power Ltd.'s net margin of 21.06%. U Power Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.93% beat H World Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 33.7%.

U Power Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 119.78%. On the other hand H World Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $50.85 which suggests that it could grow by 6.13%. Given that U Power Ltd. has higher upside potential than H World Group Ltd., analysts believe U Power Ltd. is more attractive than H World Group Ltd..

U Power Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.121, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.874%.

U Power Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. H World Group Ltd. offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. U Power Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group Ltd. pays out 120.75% of its earnings as a dividend.

U Power Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than H World Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of $979.3M. U Power Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than H World Group Ltd.'s net income of $206.3M. Notably, U Power Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while H World Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 27.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U Power Ltd. is 0.96x versus 4.37x for H World Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to U Power Ltd.'s net margin of --. U Power Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.93% beat JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s return on equity of 22.62%.

U Power Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 119.78%. On the other hand JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that U Power Ltd. has higher upside potential than JX Luxventure Group, Inc., analysts believe U Power Ltd. is more attractive than JX Luxventure Group, Inc..

U Power Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JX Luxventure Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.948, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.151%.

U Power Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JX Luxventure Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. U Power Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JX Luxventure Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

U Power Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than JX Luxventure Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. U Power Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, U Power Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while JX Luxventure Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U Power Ltd. is 0.96x versus 0.28x for JX Luxventure Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to U Power Ltd.'s net margin of -13.73%. U Power Ltd.'s return on equity of -11.93% beat Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.54%.

U Power Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 119.78%. On the other hand Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 423.56%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has higher upside potential than U Power Ltd., analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. is more attractive than U Power Ltd..

U Power Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.766%.

U Power Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. U Power Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

U Power Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of $29.9M. U Power Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s net income of -$4.1M. Notably, U Power Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is 58.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for U Power Ltd. is 0.96x versus 0.65x for Kandi Technologies Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.