TILE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kingsway Financial Services, Inc. has a net margin of 12.66% compared to Interface, Inc.'s net margin of -6.41%. Interface, Inc.'s return on equity of 21% beat Kingsway Financial Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -38.73%.

Interface, Inc. has a consensus price target of $36.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.57%. On the other hand Kingsway Financial Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -67.64%. Given that Interface, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kingsway Financial Services, Inc., analysts believe Interface, Inc. is more attractive than Kingsway Financial Services, Inc..

Interface, Inc. has a beta of 1.900, which suggesting that the stock is 90.039% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kingsway Financial Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.192, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.756%.

Interface, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. Kingsway Financial Services, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Interface, Inc. pays 2.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Kingsway Financial Services, Inc. pays out 0.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interface, Inc. quarterly revenues are $364.5M, which are larger than Kingsway Financial Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $37.6M. Interface, Inc.'s net income of $46.1M is higher than Kingsway Financial Services, Inc.'s net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Interface, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.14x while Kingsway Financial Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interface, Inc. is 1.42x versus 2.65x for Kingsway Financial Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CarMax, Inc. has a net margin of 12.66% compared to Interface, Inc.'s net margin of 1%. Interface, Inc.'s return on equity of 21% beat CarMax, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.38%.

Interface, Inc. has a consensus price target of $36.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.57%. On the other hand CarMax, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.62 which suggests that it could fall by -11.14%. Given that Interface, Inc. has higher upside potential than CarMax, Inc., analysts believe Interface, Inc. is more attractive than CarMax, Inc..

Interface, Inc. has a beta of 1.900, which suggesting that the stock is 90.039% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CarMax, Inc. has a beta of 1.354, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.39%.

Interface, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. CarMax, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Interface, Inc. pays 2.72% of its earnings as a dividend. CarMax, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Interface, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interface, Inc. quarterly revenues are $364.5M, which are smaller than CarMax, Inc. quarterly revenues of $6.2B. Interface, Inc.'s net income of $46.1M is lower than CarMax, Inc.'s net income of $62.2M. Notably, Interface, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.14x while CarMax, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interface, Inc. is 1.42x versus 0.25x for CarMax, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Third Bench, Inc. has a net margin of 12.66% compared to Interface, Inc.'s net margin of --. Interface, Inc.'s return on equity of 21% beat Third Bench, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Interface, Inc. has a consensus price target of $36.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.57%. On the other hand Third Bench, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Interface, Inc. has higher upside potential than Third Bench, Inc., analysts believe Interface, Inc. is more attractive than Third Bench, Inc..

Interface, Inc. has a beta of 1.900, which suggesting that the stock is 90.039% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Third Bench, Inc. has a beta of -57.054, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5805.378%.

Interface, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.18%. Third Bench, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Interface, Inc. pays 2.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Third Bench, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Interface, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Interface, Inc. quarterly revenues are $364.5M, which are larger than Third Bench, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Interface, Inc.'s net income of $46.1M is higher than Third Bench, Inc.'s net income of -$130.7K. Notably, Interface, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 17.14x while Third Bench, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Interface, Inc. is 1.42x versus 0.00x for Third Bench, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.