SWVL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Avalon Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 15.74% compared to Swvl Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 6.95%. Swvl Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Avalon Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -0.8%.

Swvl Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -26.11%. On the other hand Avalon Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swvl Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Avalon Holdings Corp., analysts believe Swvl Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Avalon Holdings Corp..

Swvl Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avalon Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.685, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.537%.

Swvl Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Avalon Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Swvl Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Avalon Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Swvl Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.9M, which are smaller than Avalon Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $25.7M. Swvl Holdings Corp.'s net income of $772.8K is lower than Avalon Holdings Corp.'s net income of $1.8M. Notably, Swvl Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Avalon Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is 53.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swvl Holdings Corp. is 1.06x versus 0.12x for Avalon Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CompX International, Inc. has a net margin of 15.74% compared to Swvl Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 10.57%. Swvl Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat CompX International, Inc.'s return on equity of 13.3%.

Swvl Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -26.11%. On the other hand CompX International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.18%. Given that CompX International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Swvl Holdings Corp., analysts believe CompX International, Inc. is more attractive than Swvl Holdings Corp..

Swvl Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CompX International, Inc. has a beta of 1.060, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.022%.

Swvl Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CompX International, Inc. offers a yield of 5.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Swvl Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CompX International, Inc. pays out 89.11% of its earnings as a dividend. CompX International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Swvl Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.9M, which are smaller than CompX International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $40M. Swvl Holdings Corp.'s net income of $772.8K is lower than CompX International, Inc.'s net income of $4.2M. Notably, Swvl Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CompX International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 14.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swvl Holdings Corp. is 1.06x versus 1.79x for CompX International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a net margin of 15.74% compared to Swvl Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 0.92%. Swvl Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s return on equity of -17%.

Swvl Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -26.11%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Swvl Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co., analysts believe Swvl Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co..

Swvl Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.21%.

Swvl Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Swvl Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. pays out 5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Swvl Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.9M, which are smaller than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co. quarterly revenues of $7.4M. Swvl Holdings Corp.'s net income of $772.8K is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s net income of $67.6K. Notably, Swvl Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swvl Holdings Corp. is 1.06x versus 0.53x for Chicago Rivet & Machine Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has a net margin of 15.74% compared to Swvl Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 5.78%. Swvl Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -- beat CPI Aerostructures, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.26%.

Swvl Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -26.11%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 8.99%. Given that CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has higher upside potential than Swvl Holdings Corp., analysts believe CPI Aerostructures, Inc. is more attractive than Swvl Holdings Corp..

Swvl Holdings Corp. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures, Inc. has a beta of 1.065, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.498%.

Swvl Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CPI Aerostructures, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Swvl Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Swvl Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $4.9M, which are smaller than CPI Aerostructures, Inc. quarterly revenues of $19.3M. Swvl Holdings Corp.'s net income of $772.8K is lower than CPI Aerostructures, Inc.'s net income of $1.1M. Notably, Swvl Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CPI Aerostructures, Inc.'s PE ratio is 18.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Swvl Holdings Corp. is 1.06x versus 0.66x for CPI Aerostructures, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.