Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
22
SUGP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$5.07
Seasonality move
:
-17.11%
Day range:
$4.86 - $5.03
52-week range:
$3.44 - $18.40
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
5.25x
P/S ratio:
0.23x
P/B ratio:
0.73x
Volume:
4.7K
Avg. volume:
34.4K
1-year change:
-32.94%
Market cap:
$7M
Revenue:
$24.7M
EPS (TTM):
$0.10
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GLXG
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
$5.03 | -- | $7M | 5.25x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.23x |
|
GLXG
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.
|
$2.10 | -- | $4.5M | 21.71x | $0.00 | 0% | 16.81x |
|
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
|
$1.69 | -- | $266.3M | 88.95x | $0.00 | 0% | 21.40x |
|
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
|
$2.04 | -- | $5M | 11.27x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.89x |
|
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
|
$0.92 | -- | $46.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.90x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
2.93% | 0.446 | 0.94% | 1.41x |
|
GLXG
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.
|
-- | 2.206 | -- | 0.75x |
|
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
|
0.83% | -0.015 | 0.02% | 0.89x |
|
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
|
-42.14% | 2.540 | -- | 0.40x |
|
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
|
69.75% | -0.582 | -- | 0.22x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 14.2% | 14.85% | -- | -- |
|
GLXG
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 75.5% | 83.07% | -- | -- |
|
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
|
$312K | $20.8K | 15.18% | 15.6% | 2.68% | -$13.5K |
|
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -28.67% | -103.07% | -- | -- |
SU Group Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SUGP or GLXG?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.85% beat Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 83.07%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.9M GLXGGalaxy Payroll Group Ltd.-- -- $829.2K -
What do Analysts Say About SUGP or GLXG?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SU Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd., analysts believe SU Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 GLXGGalaxy Payroll Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SUGP or GLXG More Risky?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUGP or GLXG?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SU Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. pays out 171.85% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SUGP or GLXG?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.25x while Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is 21.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SU Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.23x versus 16.81x for Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.0.23x 5.25x -- -- GLXGGalaxy Payroll Group Ltd.16.81x 21.71x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SUGP or KUBR?
Kuber Resources Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 1.25%. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.85% beat Kuber Resources Corp.'s return on equity of 15.6%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.9M KUBRKuber Resources Corp.40.25% $0.00 $25M -
What do Analysts Say About SUGP or KUBR?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kuber Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SU Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kuber Resources Corp., analysts believe SU Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Kuber Resources Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 KUBRKuber Resources Corp.0 0 0 -
Is SUGP or KUBR More Risky?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kuber Resources Corp. has a beta of 1.431, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.093%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUGP or KUBR?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kuber Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SU Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kuber Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SUGP or KUBR?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kuber Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of $775.2K. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kuber Resources Corp.'s net income of $9.7K. Notably, SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.25x while Kuber Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is 88.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SU Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.23x versus 21.40x for Kuber Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.0.23x 5.25x -- -- KUBRKuber Resources Corp.21.40x 88.95x $775.2K $9.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns SUGP or PMAX?
Powell Max Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.85% beat Powell Max Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.9M PMAXPowell Max Ltd.-- -- -$1.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SUGP or PMAX?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Powell Max Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SU Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Powell Max Ltd., analysts believe SU Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Powell Max Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 PMAXPowell Max Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SUGP or PMAX More Risky?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Powell Max Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUGP or PMAX?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Powell Max Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SU Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Powell Max Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SUGP or PMAX?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Powell Max Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Powell Max Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.25x while Powell Max Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SU Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.23x versus 0.89x for Powell Max Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.0.23x 5.25x -- -- PMAXPowell Max Ltd.0.89x 11.27x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SUGP or SFHG?
Samfine Creation Holdings Group has a net margin of -- compared to SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.85% beat Samfine Creation Holdings Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.9M SFHGSamfine Creation Holdings Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SUGP or SFHG?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Samfine Creation Holdings Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SU Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Samfine Creation Holdings Group, analysts believe SU Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Samfine Creation Holdings Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 SFHGSamfine Creation Holdings Group0 0 0 -
Is SUGP or SFHG More Risky?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Samfine Creation Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUGP or SFHG?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Samfine Creation Holdings Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SU Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Samfine Creation Holdings Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SUGP or SFHG?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Samfine Creation Holdings Group quarterly revenues of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Samfine Creation Holdings Group's net income of --. Notably, SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.25x while Samfine Creation Holdings Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SU Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.23x versus -- for Samfine Creation Holdings Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.0.23x 5.25x -- -- SFHGSamfine Creation Holdings Group-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SUGP or USPCY?
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.85% beat China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -103.07%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.9M USPCYChina Strategic Technology Group Ltd.-- -- $89.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SUGP or USPCY?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SU Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd., analysts believe SU Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 USPCYChina Strategic Technology Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SUGP or USPCY More Risky?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUGP or USPCY?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SU Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SUGP or USPCY?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.25x while China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SU Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.23x versus 0.90x for China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.0.23x 5.25x -- -- USPCYChina Strategic Technology Group Ltd.0.90x -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 3.64% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 5.43% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is down 1.4% over the past day.
