Financhill
Sell
22

SUGP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$5.82
Seasonality move :
-35.14%
Day range:
$5.69 - $5.86
52-week range:
$3.44 - $18.40
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
5.25x
P/S ratio:
0.26x
P/B ratio:
0.73x
Volume:
5.5K
Avg. volume:
128K
1-year change:
-42.57%
Market cap:
$8M
Revenue:
$24.7M
EPS (TTM):
$0.10

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
CRE
Cre8 Enterprise
-- -- -- -- --
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
-- -- -- -- --
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
-- -- -- -- --
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
-- -- -- -- --
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
$5.80 -- $8M 5.25x $0.00 0% 0.26x
CRE
Cre8 Enterprise
-- -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
$1.69 -- $266.3M 88.95x $0.00 0% 21.40x
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
$2.46 -- $6M 11.27x $0.00 0% 1.07x
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
-- -- -- -- $0.00 0% --
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
$0.92 -- $46.4M -- $0.00 0% 0.90x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
2.93% 0.878 0.94% 1.41x
CRE
Cre8 Enterprise
-- 0.000 -- --
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
0.83% -0.989 0.02% 0.89x
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
-42.14% 1.065 -- 0.40x
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
-- 0.000 -- --
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
69.75% -0.556 -- 0.22x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
-- -- 14.2% 14.85% -- --
CRE
Cre8 Enterprise
-- -- -- -- -- --
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
$312K $20.8K 15.18% 15.6% 2.68% -$13.5K
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
-- -- -- -- -- --
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
-- -- -- -- -- --
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
-- -- -28.67% -103.07% -- --

SU Group Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns SUGP or CRE?

    Cre8 Enterprise has a net margin of -- compared to SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.85% beat Cre8 Enterprise's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SUGP
    SU Group Holdings Ltd.
    -- -- $11.9M
    CRE
    Cre8 Enterprise
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About SUGP or CRE?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cre8 Enterprise has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SU Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Cre8 Enterprise, analysts believe SU Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Cre8 Enterprise.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SUGP
    SU Group Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
    CRE
    Cre8 Enterprise
    0 0 0
  • Is SUGP or CRE More Risky?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cre8 Enterprise has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUGP or CRE?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cre8 Enterprise offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SU Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cre8 Enterprise pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SUGP or CRE?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cre8 Enterprise quarterly revenues of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Cre8 Enterprise's net income of --. Notably, SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.25x while Cre8 Enterprise's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SU Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.26x versus -- for Cre8 Enterprise. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SUGP
    SU Group Holdings Ltd.
    0.26x 5.25x -- --
    CRE
    Cre8 Enterprise
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns SUGP or KUBR?

    Kuber Resources Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 1.25%. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.85% beat Kuber Resources Corp.'s return on equity of 15.6%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SUGP
    SU Group Holdings Ltd.
    -- -- $11.9M
    KUBR
    Kuber Resources Corp.
    40.25% $0.00 $25M
  • What do Analysts Say About SUGP or KUBR?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kuber Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SU Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kuber Resources Corp., analysts believe SU Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Kuber Resources Corp..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SUGP
    SU Group Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
    KUBR
    Kuber Resources Corp.
    0 0 0
  • Is SUGP or KUBR More Risky?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kuber Resources Corp. has a beta of 1.363, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.271%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUGP or KUBR?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kuber Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SU Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kuber Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SUGP or KUBR?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kuber Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of $775.2K. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kuber Resources Corp.'s net income of $9.7K. Notably, SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.25x while Kuber Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is 88.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SU Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.26x versus 21.40x for Kuber Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SUGP
    SU Group Holdings Ltd.
    0.26x 5.25x -- --
    KUBR
    Kuber Resources Corp.
    21.40x 88.95x $775.2K $9.7K
  • Which has Higher Returns SUGP or PMAX?

    Powell Max Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.85% beat Powell Max Ltd.'s return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SUGP
    SU Group Holdings Ltd.
    -- -- $11.9M
    PMAX
    Powell Max Ltd.
    -- -- -$1.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About SUGP or PMAX?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Powell Max Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SU Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Powell Max Ltd., analysts believe SU Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Powell Max Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SUGP
    SU Group Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
    PMAX
    Powell Max Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is SUGP or PMAX More Risky?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Powell Max Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUGP or PMAX?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Powell Max Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SU Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Powell Max Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SUGP or PMAX?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Powell Max Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Powell Max Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.25x while Powell Max Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SU Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.26x versus 1.07x for Powell Max Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SUGP
    SU Group Holdings Ltd.
    0.26x 5.25x -- --
    PMAX
    Powell Max Ltd.
    1.07x 11.27x -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns SUGP or SFHG?

    Samfine Creation Holdings Group has a net margin of -- compared to SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.85% beat Samfine Creation Holdings Group's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SUGP
    SU Group Holdings Ltd.
    -- -- $11.9M
    SFHG
    Samfine Creation Holdings Group
    -- -- --
  • What do Analysts Say About SUGP or SFHG?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Samfine Creation Holdings Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SU Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Samfine Creation Holdings Group, analysts believe SU Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Samfine Creation Holdings Group.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SUGP
    SU Group Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
    SFHG
    Samfine Creation Holdings Group
    0 0 0
  • Is SUGP or SFHG More Risky?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Samfine Creation Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUGP or SFHG?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Samfine Creation Holdings Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SU Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Samfine Creation Holdings Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SUGP or SFHG?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Samfine Creation Holdings Group quarterly revenues of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Samfine Creation Holdings Group's net income of --. Notably, SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.25x while Samfine Creation Holdings Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SU Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.26x versus -- for Samfine Creation Holdings Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SUGP
    SU Group Holdings Ltd.
    0.26x 5.25x -- --
    SFHG
    Samfine Creation Holdings Group
    -- -- -- --
  • Which has Higher Returns SUGP or USPCY?

    China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.85% beat China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -103.07%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    SUGP
    SU Group Holdings Ltd.
    -- -- $11.9M
    USPCY
    China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
    -- -- $89.3M
  • What do Analysts Say About SUGP or USPCY?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SU Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd., analysts believe SU Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd..

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    SUGP
    SU Group Holdings Ltd.
    0 0 0
    USPCY
    China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
    0 0 0
  • Is SUGP or USPCY More Risky?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUGP or USPCY?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SU Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios SUGP or USPCY?

    SU Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.25x while China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SU Group Holdings Ltd. is 0.26x versus 0.90x for China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    SUGP
    SU Group Holdings Ltd.
    0.26x 5.25x -- --
    USPCY
    China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
    0.90x -- -- --

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?
Will UnitedHealth Stock Recover?

Shares of embattled health insurance giant UnitedHealth (NYSE:UNH) plummeted by…

Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?
Is Lumentum The Best Laser Stock to Buy?

Though certainly less well-known than the huge tech businesses that…

Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?
Is Planet Fitness Stock Undervalued?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) has had a difficult 12 months, retreating…

Stock Ideas

Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x

Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
40
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x

Alerts

Buy
91
TDC alert for Feb 12

Teradata Corp. [TDC] is down 11.64% over the past day.

Buy
67
DIOD alert for Feb 12

Diodes, Inc. [DIOD] is down 7.63% over the past day.

Buy
77
VRT alert for Feb 12

Vertiv Holdings Co. [VRT] is down 4.79% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock