Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Sell
43
SUGP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$6.20
Seasonality move
:
-11.26%
Day range:
$5.37 - $6.70
52-week range:
$3.44 - $26.60
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
5.25x
P/S ratio:
1.64x
P/B ratio:
0.73x
Volume:
75.5K
Avg. volume:
92.3K
1-year change:
-63.74%
Market cap:
$7.7M
Revenue:
$23.3M
EPS (TTM):
$0.10
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
$5.57 | -- | $7.7M | 5.25x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.64x |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$0.49 | -- | $8.1M | 810.21x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.81x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
$1.08 | -- | $8.2M | 11.50x | $0.08 | 0% | 0.54x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$1.24 | -- | $5.7M | 80.00x | $0.05 | 9.68% | 0.77x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
$0.46 | -- | $9.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.09x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
$2.50 | -- | $148.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 21.75x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
2.93% | 1.766 | 0.94% | 1.41x |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
3.84% | -2.181 | 0.68% | 24.62x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | 1.418 | -- | 1.59x |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
9.28% | 0.683 | 9.21% | 2.69x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
2.59% | 4.234 | 5.34% | 1.88x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | 4.699 | -- | 6.29x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 14.2% | 14.85% | -- | -- |
|
CIIT
Tianci International, Inc.
|
$83.7K | -$1.5M | -138.51% | -140.31% | -66.75% | -$1.2M |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 13.66% | 13.71% | -- | -- |
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings Ltd.
|
$527K | -$138K | 0.98% | 1.13% | -8.92% | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -17.65% | -18.39% | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -55.86% | -55.86% | -- | -- |
SU Group Holdings Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SUGP or CIIT?
Tianci International, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of -67%. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.85% beat Tianci International, Inc.'s return on equity of -140.31%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.9M CIITTianci International, Inc.3.68% -$0.09 $3.1M -
What do Analysts Say About SUGP or CIIT?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tianci International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SU Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Tianci International, Inc., analysts believe SU Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Tianci International, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CIITTianci International, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SUGP or CIIT More Risky?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tianci International, Inc. has a beta of -2.851, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 385.061%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUGP or CIIT?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tianci International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SU Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tianci International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SUGP or CIIT?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tianci International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.3M. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Tianci International, Inc.'s net income of -$1.5M. Notably, SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.25x while Tianci International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 810.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SU Group Holdings Ltd. is 1.64x versus 0.81x for Tianci International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.1.64x 5.25x -- -- CIITTianci International, Inc.0.81x 810.21x $2.3M -$1.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns SUGP or CLWT?
Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.85% beat Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s return on equity of 13.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.9M CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.-- -- $15.8M -
What do Analysts Say About SUGP or CLWT?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SU Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd., analysts believe SU Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SUGP or CLWT More Risky?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. has a beta of 0.879, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.111%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUGP or CLWT?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. SU Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SUGP or CLWT?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.25x while Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SU Group Holdings Ltd. is 1.64x versus 0.54x for Euro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.1.64x 5.25x -- -- CLWTEuro Tech Holdings Co. Ltd.0.54x 11.50x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SUGP or HIHO?
Highway Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of 3.69%. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.85% beat Highway Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 1.13%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.9M HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.34.07% $0.01 $7M -
What do Analysts Say About SUGP or HIHO?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Highway Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SU Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Highway Holdings Ltd., analysts believe SU Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Highway Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SUGP or HIHO More Risky?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Highway Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.379, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.149%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUGP or HIHO?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Highway Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 9.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. SU Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Highway Holdings Ltd. pays out 497.93% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SUGP or HIHO?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Highway Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of $1.5M. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Highway Holdings Ltd.'s net income of $57K. Notably, SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.25x while Highway Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 80.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SU Group Holdings Ltd. is 1.64x versus 0.77x for Highway Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.1.64x 5.25x -- -- HIHOHighway Holdings Ltd.0.77x 80.00x $1.5M $57K
-
Which has Higher Returns SUGP or ILAG?
Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.85% beat Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s return on equity of -18.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.9M ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.-- -- $14.5M -
What do Analysts Say About SUGP or ILAG?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SU Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc., analysts believe SU Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is SUGP or ILAG More Risky?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUGP or ILAG?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SU Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SUGP or ILAG?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.25x while Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SU Group Holdings Ltd. is 1.64x versus 1.09x for Intelligent Living Application Group, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.1.64x 5.25x -- -- ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group, Inc.1.09x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SUGP or ROMA?
Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net margin of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.85% beat Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s return on equity of -55.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.9M ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.-- -- $7.6M -
What do Analysts Say About SUGP or ROMA?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roma Green Finance Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SU Group Holdings Ltd. has higher upside potential than Roma Green Finance Ltd., analysts believe SU Group Holdings Ltd. is more attractive than Roma Green Finance Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is SUGP or ROMA More Risky?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roma Green Finance Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SUGP or ROMA?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Roma Green Finance Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SU Group Holdings Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Roma Green Finance Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SUGP or ROMA?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Roma Green Finance Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 5.25x while Roma Green Finance Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SU Group Holdings Ltd. is 1.64x versus 21.75x for Roma Green Finance Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.1.64x 5.25x -- -- ROMARoma Green Finance Ltd.21.75x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
67
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
47
PSTG alert for Dec 5
Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.
Sell
38
HOV alert for Dec 5
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 22.58% over the past day.
Buy
69
ASTS alert for Dec 5
AST Spacemobile, Inc. [ASTS] is up 18.25% over the past day.
