Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
35
GLXG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.05
Seasonality move
:
-33.78%
Day range:
$1.92 - $2.22
52-week range:
$1.54 - $16.80
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
21.71x
P/S ratio:
16.81x
P/B ratio:
1.61x
Volume:
9.9K
Avg. volume:
165.7K
1-year change:
-74.72%
Market cap:
$4.5M
Revenue:
$448.6K
EPS (TTM):
$0.04
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GLXG
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GLXG
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.
|
$2.10 | -- | $4.5M | 21.71x | $0.00 | 0% | 16.81x |
|
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
|
$1.69 | -- | $266.3M | 88.95x | $0.00 | 0% | 21.40x |
|
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
|
$2.04 | -- | $5M | 11.27x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.89x |
|
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
$5.03 | -- | $7M | 5.25x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.23x |
|
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
|
$0.92 | -- | $46.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.90x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GLXG
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.
|
-- | 2.206 | -- | 0.75x |
|
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
|
0.83% | -0.015 | 0.02% | 0.89x |
|
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
|
-42.14% | 2.540 | -- | 0.40x |
|
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
2.93% | 0.446 | 0.94% | 1.41x |
|
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
|
69.75% | -0.582 | -- | 0.22x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GLXG
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 75.5% | 83.07% | -- | -- |
|
KUBR
Kuber Resources Corp.
|
$312K | $20.8K | 15.18% | 15.6% | 2.68% | -$13.5K |
|
PMAX
Powell Max Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SFHG
Samfine Creation Holdings Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SUGP
SU Group Holdings Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 14.2% | 14.85% | -- | -- |
|
USPCY
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -28.67% | -103.07% | -- | -- |
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GLXG or KUBR?
Kuber Resources Corp. has a net margin of -- compared to Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s net margin of 1.25%. Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 83.07% beat Kuber Resources Corp.'s return on equity of 15.6%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GLXGGalaxy Payroll Group Ltd.-- -- $829.2K KUBRKuber Resources Corp.40.25% $0.00 $25M -
What do Analysts Say About GLXG or KUBR?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kuber Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Kuber Resources Corp., analysts believe Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. is more attractive than Kuber Resources Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GLXGGalaxy Payroll Group Ltd.0 0 0 KUBRKuber Resources Corp.0 0 0 -
Is GLXG or KUBR More Risky?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kuber Resources Corp. has a beta of 1.431, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.093%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLXG or KUBR?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kuber Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. pays 171.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Kuber Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GLXG or KUBR?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kuber Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of $775.2K. Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Kuber Resources Corp.'s net income of $9.7K. Notably, Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while Kuber Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is 88.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. is 16.81x versus 21.40x for Kuber Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GLXGGalaxy Payroll Group Ltd.16.81x 21.71x -- -- KUBRKuber Resources Corp.21.40x 88.95x $775.2K $9.7K
-
Which has Higher Returns GLXG or PMAX?
Powell Max Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 83.07% beat Powell Max Ltd.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GLXGGalaxy Payroll Group Ltd.-- -- $829.2K PMAXPowell Max Ltd.-- -- -$1.3M -
What do Analysts Say About GLXG or PMAX?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Powell Max Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Powell Max Ltd., analysts believe Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. is more attractive than Powell Max Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GLXGGalaxy Payroll Group Ltd.0 0 0 PMAXPowell Max Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GLXG or PMAX More Risky?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Powell Max Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLXG or PMAX?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Powell Max Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. pays 171.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Powell Max Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GLXG or PMAX?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Powell Max Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Powell Max Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while Powell Max Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. is 16.81x versus 0.89x for Powell Max Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GLXGGalaxy Payroll Group Ltd.16.81x 21.71x -- -- PMAXPowell Max Ltd.0.89x 11.27x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GLXG or SFHG?
Samfine Creation Holdings Group has a net margin of -- compared to Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 83.07% beat Samfine Creation Holdings Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GLXGGalaxy Payroll Group Ltd.-- -- $829.2K SFHGSamfine Creation Holdings Group-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GLXG or SFHG?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Samfine Creation Holdings Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than Samfine Creation Holdings Group, analysts believe Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. is more attractive than Samfine Creation Holdings Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GLXGGalaxy Payroll Group Ltd.0 0 0 SFHGSamfine Creation Holdings Group0 0 0 -
Is GLXG or SFHG More Risky?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Samfine Creation Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLXG or SFHG?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Samfine Creation Holdings Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. pays 171.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Samfine Creation Holdings Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GLXG or SFHG?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Samfine Creation Holdings Group quarterly revenues of --. Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Samfine Creation Holdings Group's net income of --. Notably, Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while Samfine Creation Holdings Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. is 16.81x versus -- for Samfine Creation Holdings Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GLXGGalaxy Payroll Group Ltd.16.81x 21.71x -- -- SFHGSamfine Creation Holdings Group-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GLXG or SUGP?
SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 83.07% beat SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s return on equity of 14.85%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GLXGGalaxy Payroll Group Ltd.-- -- $829.2K SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.-- -- $11.9M -
What do Analysts Say About GLXG or SUGP?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SU Group Holdings Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than SU Group Holdings Ltd., analysts believe Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. is more attractive than SU Group Holdings Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GLXGGalaxy Payroll Group Ltd.0 0 0 SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GLXG or SUGP More Risky?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SU Group Holdings Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLXG or SUGP?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SU Group Holdings Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. pays 171.85% of its earnings as a dividend. SU Group Holdings Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GLXG or SUGP?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SU Group Holdings Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while SU Group Holdings Ltd.'s PE ratio is 5.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. is 16.81x versus 0.23x for SU Group Holdings Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GLXGGalaxy Payroll Group Ltd.16.81x 21.71x -- -- SUGPSU Group Holdings Ltd.0.23x 5.25x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GLXG or USPCY?
China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s net margin of --. Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s return on equity of 83.07% beat China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.'s return on equity of -103.07%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GLXGGalaxy Payroll Group Ltd.-- -- $829.2K USPCYChina Strategic Technology Group Ltd.-- -- $89.3M -
What do Analysts Say About GLXG or USPCY?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has higher upside potential than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd., analysts believe Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. is more attractive than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GLXGGalaxy Payroll Group Ltd.0 0 0 USPCYChina Strategic Technology Group Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is GLXG or USPCY More Risky?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GLXG or USPCY?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. pays 171.85% of its earnings as a dividend. China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GLXG or USPCY?
Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.71x while China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Galaxy Payroll Group Ltd. is 16.81x versus 0.90x for China Strategic Technology Group Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GLXGGalaxy Payroll Group Ltd.16.81x 21.71x -- -- USPCYChina Strategic Technology Group Ltd.0.90x -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Sell
47
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
34
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 28x
Alerts
Sell
46
ZD alert for Mar 4
Ziff Davis, Inc. [ZD] is up 3.64% over the past day.
Buy
54
KORU alert for Mar 4
Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X Shares [KORU] is up 5.43% over the past day.
Sell
40
PSIX alert for Mar 4
Power Solutions International, Inc. [PSIX] is down 1.4% over the past day.
