SSSS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment Corp. has a net margin of 95.98% compared to SuRo Capital Corp.'s net margin of -616.21%. SuRo Capital Corp.'s return on equity of 37.37% beat Gladstone Investment Corp.'s return on equity of 18.81%.

SuRo Capital Corp. has a consensus price target of $11.15, signalling upside risk potential of 20.54%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $14.13 which suggests that it could grow by 3.25%. Given that SuRo Capital Corp. has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment Corp., analysts believe SuRo Capital Corp. is more attractive than Gladstone Investment Corp..

SuRo Capital Corp. has a beta of 1.416, which suggesting that the stock is 41.623% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment Corp. has a beta of 0.836, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.408%.

SuRo Capital Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.41%. Gladstone Investment Corp. offers a yield of 7.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. SuRo Capital Corp. pays 0.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment Corp. pays out 53.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SuRo Capital Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.7M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment Corp. quarterly revenues of -$4.7M. SuRo Capital Corp.'s net income of $7.4M is lower than Gladstone Investment Corp.'s net income of $28.7M. Notably, SuRo Capital Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.81x while Gladstone Investment Corp.'s PE ratio is 5.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuRo Capital Corp. is 6.38x versus 5.74x for Gladstone Investment Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has a net margin of 95.98% compared to SuRo Capital Corp.'s net margin of 52.21%. SuRo Capital Corp.'s return on equity of 37.37% beat Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s return on equity of 9.39%.

SuRo Capital Corp. has a consensus price target of $11.15, signalling upside risk potential of 20.54%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.77%. Given that SuRo Capital Corp. has higher upside potential than Golub Capital BDC, Inc., analysts believe SuRo Capital Corp. is more attractive than Golub Capital BDC, Inc..

SuRo Capital Corp. has a beta of 1.416, which suggesting that the stock is 41.623% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC, Inc. has a beta of 0.436, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.439%.

SuRo Capital Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.41%. Golub Capital BDC, Inc. offers a yield of 11.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. SuRo Capital Corp. pays 0.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC, Inc. pays out 113.7% of its earnings as a dividend. SuRo Capital Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s is not.

SuRo Capital Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.7M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC, Inc. quarterly revenues of $184.4M. SuRo Capital Corp.'s net income of $7.4M is lower than Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s net income of $96.3M. Notably, SuRo Capital Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.81x while Golub Capital BDC, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuRo Capital Corp. is 6.38x versus 4.45x for Golub Capital BDC, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 95.98% compared to SuRo Capital Corp.'s net margin of 43.19%. SuRo Capital Corp.'s return on equity of 37.37% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 7.18%.

SuRo Capital Corp. has a consensus price target of $11.15, signalling upside risk potential of 20.54%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $12.91 which suggests that it could grow by 12.92%. Given that SuRo Capital Corp. has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe SuRo Capital Corp. is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.

SuRo Capital Corp. has a beta of 1.416, which suggesting that the stock is 41.623% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.737, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.339%.

SuRo Capital Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.41%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 13.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. SuRo Capital Corp. pays 0.38% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 119.91% of its earnings as a dividend. SuRo Capital Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

SuRo Capital Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.7M, which are smaller than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $63.6M. SuRo Capital Corp.'s net income of $7.4M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $27.5M. Notably, SuRo Capital Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.81x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuRo Capital Corp. is 6.38x versus 4.50x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a net margin of 95.98% compared to SuRo Capital Corp.'s net margin of 29.17%. SuRo Capital Corp.'s return on equity of 37.37% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s return on equity of 2.31%.

SuRo Capital Corp. has a consensus price target of $11.15, signalling upside risk potential of 20.54%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $13.71 which suggests that it could grow by 7.94%. Given that SuRo Capital Corp. has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp., analysts believe SuRo Capital Corp. is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp..

SuRo Capital Corp. has a beta of 1.416, which suggesting that the stock is 41.623% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.325%.

SuRo Capital Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.41%. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. offers a yield of 12.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. SuRo Capital Corp. pays 0.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. pays out 444.05% of its earnings as a dividend. SuRo Capital Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s is not.

SuRo Capital Corp. quarterly revenues are $5.7M, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp. quarterly revenues of $84.3M. SuRo Capital Corp.'s net income of $7.4M is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s net income of $24.6M. Notably, SuRo Capital Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 3.81x while Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.'s PE ratio is 33.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SuRo Capital Corp. is 6.38x versus 3.65x for Oaktree Specialty Lending Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.