SMID Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum Co. has a net margin of 13.41% compared to Smith-Midland Corp.'s net margin of 1.68%. Smith-Midland Corp.'s return on equity of 25.76% beat Century Aluminum Co.'s return on equity of 10.05%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Century Aluminum Co. has an analysts' consensus of $59.00 which suggests that it could grow by 10.4%. Given that Century Aluminum Co. has higher upside potential than Smith-Midland Corp., analysts believe Century Aluminum Co. is more attractive than Smith-Midland Corp..

Smith-Midland Corp. has a beta of 1.831, which suggesting that the stock is 83.084% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum Co. has a beta of 2.237, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.674%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum Co. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith-Midland Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum Co. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Smith-Midland Corp. quarterly revenues are $21.5M, which are smaller than Century Aluminum Co. quarterly revenues of $632.2M. Smith-Midland Corp.'s net income of $2.9M is lower than Century Aluminum Co.'s net income of $10.6M. Notably, Smith-Midland Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while Century Aluminum Co.'s PE ratio is 66.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith-Midland Corp. is 2.02x versus 2.07x for Century Aluminum Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a net margin of 13.41% compared to Smith-Midland Corp.'s net margin of 4.68%. Smith-Midland Corp.'s return on equity of 25.76% beat Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s return on equity of 12.44%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $112.50 which suggests that it could fall by -22.26%. Given that Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has higher upside potential than Smith-Midland Corp., analysts believe Kaiser Aluminum Corp. is more attractive than Smith-Midland Corp..

Smith-Midland Corp. has a beta of 1.831, which suggesting that the stock is 83.084% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.06%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Smith-Midland Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. pays out 107.4% of its earnings as a dividend.

Smith-Midland Corp. quarterly revenues are $21.5M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum Corp. quarterly revenues of $843.5M. Smith-Midland Corp.'s net income of $2.9M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s net income of $39.5M. Notably, Smith-Midland Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s PE ratio is 26.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith-Midland Corp. is 2.02x versus 0.74x for Kaiser Aluminum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of 13.41% compared to Smith-Midland Corp.'s net margin of --. Smith-Midland Corp.'s return on equity of 25.76% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -43.51%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $3.25 which suggests that it could grow by 34.86%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than Smith-Midland Corp., analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Smith-Midland Corp..

Smith-Midland Corp. has a beta of 1.831, which suggesting that the stock is 83.084% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.307, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.705%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith-Midland Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Smith-Midland Corp. quarterly revenues are $21.5M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Smith-Midland Corp.'s net income of $2.9M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.4M. Notably, Smith-Midland Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith-Midland Corp. is 2.02x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of 13.41% compared to Smith-Midland Corp.'s net margin of --. Smith-Midland Corp.'s return on equity of 25.76% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 98.15%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Smith-Midland Corp., analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than Smith-Midland Corp..

Smith-Midland Corp. has a beta of 1.831, which suggesting that the stock is 83.084% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.452, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.823%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith-Midland Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Smith-Midland Corp. quarterly revenues are $21.5M, which are larger than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Smith-Midland Corp.'s net income of $2.9M is higher than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Smith-Midland Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.24x while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith-Midland Corp. is 2.02x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.