SMID Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Friedman Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 13.41% compared to Smith-Midland Corp.'s net margin of 1.45%. Smith-Midland Corp.'s return on equity of 25.76% beat Friedman Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.53%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Friedman Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smith-Midland Corp. has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, Inc., analysts believe Smith-Midland Corp. is more attractive than Friedman Industries, Inc..

Smith-Midland Corp. has a beta of 1.800, which suggesting that the stock is 79.962% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.515%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Smith-Midland Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries, Inc. pays out 18.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith-Midland Corp. quarterly revenues are $21.5M, which are smaller than Friedman Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $152.4M. Smith-Midland Corp.'s net income of $2.9M is higher than Friedman Industries, Inc.'s net income of $2.2M. Notably, Smith-Midland Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.96x while Friedman Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 12.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith-Midland Corp. is 2.12x versus 0.27x for Friedman Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a net margin of 13.41% compared to Smith-Midland Corp.'s net margin of 4.68%. Smith-Midland Corp.'s return on equity of 25.76% beat Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s return on equity of 12.44%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $106.50 which suggests that it could fall by -13.46%. Given that Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has higher upside potential than Smith-Midland Corp., analysts believe Kaiser Aluminum Corp. is more attractive than Smith-Midland Corp..

Smith-Midland Corp. has a beta of 1.800, which suggesting that the stock is 79.962% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum Corp. has a beta of 1.440, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.951%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. offers a yield of 2.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Smith-Midland Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. pays out 107.4% of its earnings as a dividend.

Smith-Midland Corp. quarterly revenues are $21.5M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum Corp. quarterly revenues of $843.5M. Smith-Midland Corp.'s net income of $2.9M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s net income of $39.5M. Notably, Smith-Midland Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.96x while Kaiser Aluminum Corp.'s PE ratio is 22.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith-Midland Corp. is 2.12x versus 0.63x for Kaiser Aluminum Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a net margin of 13.41% compared to Smith-Midland Corp.'s net margin of --. Smith-Midland Corp.'s return on equity of 25.76% beat Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s return on equity of -34.36%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 39.34%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has higher upside potential than Smith-Midland Corp., analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. is more attractive than Smith-Midland Corp..

Smith-Midland Corp. has a beta of 1.800, which suggesting that the stock is 79.962% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.562%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith-Midland Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Smith-Midland Corp. quarterly revenues are $21.5M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Smith-Midland Corp.'s net income of $2.9M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s net income of -$4.3M. Notably, Smith-Midland Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.96x while Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith-Midland Corp. is 2.12x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources Corp. has a net margin of 13.41% compared to Smith-Midland Corp.'s net margin of --. Smith-Midland Corp.'s return on equity of 25.76% beat Solitario Resources Corp.'s return on equity of -20.59%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Solitario Resources Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 110.03%. Given that Solitario Resources Corp. has higher upside potential than Smith-Midland Corp., analysts believe Solitario Resources Corp. is more attractive than Smith-Midland Corp..

Smith-Midland Corp. has a beta of 1.800, which suggesting that the stock is 79.962% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources Corp. has a beta of 0.399, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.124%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith-Midland Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Smith-Midland Corp. quarterly revenues are $21.5M, which are larger than Solitario Resources Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Smith-Midland Corp.'s net income of $2.9M is higher than Solitario Resources Corp.'s net income of -$1.9M. Notably, Smith-Midland Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 15.96x while Solitario Resources Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith-Midland Corp. is 2.12x versus -- for Solitario Resources Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.