SMID Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CRH Plc has a net margin of 13.41% compared to Smith-Midland Corp.'s net margin of 13.72%. Smith-Midland Corp.'s return on equity of 25.76% beat CRH Plc's return on equity of 14.84%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CRH Plc has an analysts' consensus of $134.84 which suggests that it could grow by 11.39%. Given that CRH Plc has higher upside potential than Smith-Midland Corp., analysts believe CRH Plc is more attractive than Smith-Midland Corp..

Smith-Midland Corp. has a beta of 1.809, which suggesting that the stock is 80.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CRH Plc has a beta of 1.356, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.599%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CRH Plc offers a yield of 1.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Smith-Midland Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CRH Plc pays out 28.31% of its earnings as a dividend. CRH Plc's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith-Midland Corp. quarterly revenues are $21.5M, which are smaller than CRH Plc quarterly revenues of $11.1B. Smith-Midland Corp.'s net income of $2.9M is lower than CRH Plc's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Smith-Midland Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.06x while CRH Plc's PE ratio is 24.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith-Midland Corp. is 2.13x versus 2.23x for CRH Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Eagle Materials, Inc. has a net margin of 13.41% compared to Smith-Midland Corp.'s net margin of 21.5%. Smith-Midland Corp.'s return on equity of 25.76% beat Eagle Materials, Inc.'s return on equity of 30.14%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Eagle Materials, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $243.90 which suggests that it could grow by 9.92%. Given that Eagle Materials, Inc. has higher upside potential than Smith-Midland Corp., analysts believe Eagle Materials, Inc. is more attractive than Smith-Midland Corp..

Smith-Midland Corp. has a beta of 1.809, which suggesting that the stock is 80.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eagle Materials, Inc. has a beta of 1.368, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.803%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Eagle Materials, Inc. offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Smith-Midland Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eagle Materials, Inc. pays out 7.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Eagle Materials, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith-Midland Corp. quarterly revenues are $21.5M, which are smaller than Eagle Materials, Inc. quarterly revenues of $638.9M. Smith-Midland Corp.'s net income of $2.9M is lower than Eagle Materials, Inc.'s net income of $137.4M. Notably, Smith-Midland Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.06x while Eagle Materials, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith-Midland Corp. is 2.13x versus 3.18x for Eagle Materials, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Monarch Cement Co. has a net margin of 13.41% compared to Smith-Midland Corp.'s net margin of 27.61%. Smith-Midland Corp.'s return on equity of 25.76% beat The Monarch Cement Co.'s return on equity of 15.13%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The Monarch Cement Co. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Smith-Midland Corp. has higher upside potential than The Monarch Cement Co., analysts believe Smith-Midland Corp. is more attractive than The Monarch Cement Co..

Smith-Midland Corp. has a beta of 1.809, which suggesting that the stock is 80.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Monarch Cement Co. has a beta of 0.444, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.579%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Monarch Cement Co. offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Smith-Midland Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Monarch Cement Co. pays out 16.26% of its earnings as a dividend. The Monarch Cement Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Smith-Midland Corp. quarterly revenues are $21.5M, which are smaller than The Monarch Cement Co. quarterly revenues of $67.8M. Smith-Midland Corp.'s net income of $2.9M is lower than The Monarch Cement Co.'s net income of $18.7M. Notably, Smith-Midland Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.06x while The Monarch Cement Co.'s PE ratio is 13.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith-Midland Corp. is 2.13x versus 3.19x for The Monarch Cement Co.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Westwater Resources, Inc. has a net margin of 13.41% compared to Smith-Midland Corp.'s net margin of --. Smith-Midland Corp.'s return on equity of 25.76% beat Westwater Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of -14.27%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Westwater Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $1.75 which suggests that it could grow by 96.34%. Given that Westwater Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Smith-Midland Corp., analysts believe Westwater Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Smith-Midland Corp..

Smith-Midland Corp. has a beta of 1.809, which suggesting that the stock is 80.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Westwater Resources, Inc. has a beta of 1.388, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.849%.

Smith-Midland Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Westwater Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Smith-Midland Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Westwater Resources, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Smith-Midland Corp. quarterly revenues are $21.5M, which are larger than Westwater Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Smith-Midland Corp.'s net income of $2.9M is higher than Westwater Resources, Inc.'s net income of -$9.8M. Notably, Smith-Midland Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 16.06x while Westwater Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Smith-Midland Corp. is 2.13x versus 8.73x for Westwater Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.