SBAC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crown Castle has a net margin of 33.23% compared to SBA Communications's net margin of -43.73%. SBA Communications's return on equity of -- beat Crown Castle's return on equity of -149.84%.

SBA Communications has a consensus price target of $254.12, signalling upside risk potential of 6.02%. On the other hand Crown Castle has an analysts' consensus of $114.11 which suggests that it could grow by 8.68%. Given that Crown Castle has higher upside potential than SBA Communications, analysts believe Crown Castle is more attractive than SBA Communications.

SBA Communications has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 17.015% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Castle has a beta of 0.928, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.215%.

SBA Communications has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.69%. Crown Castle offers a yield of 5.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share. SBA Communications pays 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Castle pays out -69.92% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SBA Communications quarterly revenues are $664.2M, which are smaller than Crown Castle quarterly revenues of $1.1B. SBA Communications's net income of $220.7M is higher than Crown Castle's net income of -$464M. Notably, SBA Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.71x while Crown Castle's PE ratio is 33.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBA Communications is 9.63x versus 7.63x for Crown Castle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Healthpeak Properties has a net margin of 33.23% compared to SBA Communications's net margin of 6.09%. SBA Communications's return on equity of -- beat Healthpeak Properties's return on equity of 3.03%.

SBA Communications has a consensus price target of $254.12, signalling upside risk potential of 6.02%. On the other hand Healthpeak Properties has an analysts' consensus of $23.79 which suggests that it could grow by 36.2%. Given that Healthpeak Properties has higher upside potential than SBA Communications, analysts believe Healthpeak Properties is more attractive than SBA Communications.

SBA Communications has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 17.015% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.053, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.297%.

SBA Communications has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.69%. Healthpeak Properties offers a yield of 7.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. SBA Communications pays 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Healthpeak Properties pays out 326.88% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Healthpeak Properties's is not.

SBA Communications quarterly revenues are $664.2M, which are smaller than Healthpeak Properties quarterly revenues of $702.9M. SBA Communications's net income of $220.7M is higher than Healthpeak Properties's net income of $42.8M. Notably, SBA Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.71x while Healthpeak Properties's PE ratio is 43.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBA Communications is 9.63x versus 4.38x for Healthpeak Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Development has a net margin of 33.23% compared to SBA Communications's net margin of -2883.88%. SBA Communications's return on equity of -- beat Safe & Green Development's return on equity of --.

SBA Communications has a consensus price target of $254.12, signalling upside risk potential of 6.02%. On the other hand Safe & Green Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SBA Communications has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development, analysts believe SBA Communications is more attractive than Safe & Green Development.

SBA Communications has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 17.015% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Development has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SBA Communications has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.69%. Safe & Green Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SBA Communications pays 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SBA Communications quarterly revenues are $664.2M, which are larger than Safe & Green Development quarterly revenues of $81.2K. SBA Communications's net income of $220.7M is higher than Safe & Green Development's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, SBA Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.71x while Safe & Green Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBA Communications is 9.63x versus 3.55x for Safe & Green Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Weyerhaeuser has a net margin of 33.23% compared to SBA Communications's net margin of 4.71%. SBA Communications's return on equity of -- beat Weyerhaeuser's return on equity of 3.7%.

SBA Communications has a consensus price target of $254.12, signalling upside risk potential of 6.02%. On the other hand Weyerhaeuser has an analysts' consensus of $34.08 which suggests that it could grow by 29.72%. Given that Weyerhaeuser has higher upside potential than SBA Communications, analysts believe Weyerhaeuser is more attractive than SBA Communications.

SBA Communications has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 17.015% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Weyerhaeuser has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.284%.

SBA Communications has a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.69%. Weyerhaeuser offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. SBA Communications pays 56.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Weyerhaeuser pays out 172.73% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Weyerhaeuser's is not.

SBA Communications quarterly revenues are $664.2M, which are smaller than Weyerhaeuser quarterly revenues of $1.8B. SBA Communications's net income of $220.7M is higher than Weyerhaeuser's net income of $83M. Notably, SBA Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.71x while Weyerhaeuser's PE ratio is 52.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBA Communications is 9.63x versus 2.69x for Weyerhaeuser. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.