RVSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Elbit Systems has a net margin of -- compared to Rail Vision's net margin of 4.61%. Rail Vision's return on equity of -- beat Elbit Systems's return on equity of 8.76%.

Rail Vision has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1302.81%. On the other hand Elbit Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.44%. Given that Rail Vision has higher upside potential than Elbit Systems, analysts believe Rail Vision is more attractive than Elbit Systems.

Rail Vision has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Elbit Systems has a beta of 0.526, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.441%.

Rail Vision has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Elbit Systems offers a yield of 0.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Rail Vision pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems pays out 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rail Vision quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Elbit Systems quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Rail Vision's net income of -- is lower than Elbit Systems's net income of $79.1M. Notably, Rail Vision's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Elbit Systems's PE ratio is 44.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rail Vision is -- versus 1.76x for Elbit Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kornit Digital has a net margin of -- compared to Rail Vision's net margin of -1.79%. Rail Vision's return on equity of -- beat Kornit Digital's return on equity of -5.27%.

Rail Vision has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1302.81%. On the other hand Kornit Digital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -1.9%. Given that Rail Vision has higher upside potential than Kornit Digital, analysts believe Rail Vision is more attractive than Kornit Digital.

Rail Vision has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kornit Digital has a beta of 2.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.446%.

Rail Vision has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kornit Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rail Vision pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kornit Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rail Vision quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kornit Digital quarterly revenues of $50.7M. Rail Vision's net income of -- is lower than Kornit Digital's net income of -$908K. Notably, Rail Vision's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kornit Digital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rail Vision is -- versus 7.80x for Kornit Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SuperCom has a net margin of -- compared to Rail Vision's net margin of --. Rail Vision's return on equity of -- beat SuperCom's return on equity of --.

Rail Vision has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1302.81%. On the other hand SuperCom has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 255.03%. Given that Rail Vision has higher upside potential than SuperCom, analysts believe Rail Vision is more attractive than SuperCom.

Rail Vision has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SuperCom has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.195%.

Rail Vision has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SuperCom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rail Vision pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SuperCom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rail Vision quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SuperCom quarterly revenues of --. Rail Vision's net income of -- is lower than SuperCom's net income of --. Notably, Rail Vision's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SuperCom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rail Vision is -- versus 0.11x for SuperCom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TAT Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Rail Vision's net margin of 7.08%. Rail Vision's return on equity of -- beat TAT Technologies's return on equity of 8.53%.

Rail Vision has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 1302.81%. On the other hand TAT Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.43%. Given that Rail Vision has higher upside potential than TAT Technologies, analysts believe Rail Vision is more attractive than TAT Technologies.

Rail Vision has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.936, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.403%.

Rail Vision has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TAT Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rail Vision pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TAT Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rail Vision quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TAT Technologies quarterly revenues of $40.5M. Rail Vision's net income of -- is lower than TAT Technologies's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Rail Vision's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TAT Technologies's PE ratio is 35.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rail Vision is -- versus 1.86x for TAT Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.