CSTE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Apogee Enterprises has a net margin of -12.94% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of 0.72%. Caesarstone's return on equity of -17.3% beat Apogee Enterprises's return on equity of 17.24%.

Caesarstone has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 131.48%. On the other hand Apogee Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $55.00 which suggests that it could grow by 34.94%. Given that Caesarstone has higher upside potential than Apogee Enterprises, analysts believe Caesarstone is more attractive than Apogee Enterprises.

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.473% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Apogee Enterprises has a beta of 0.992, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.836%.

Caesarstone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Apogee Enterprises offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Caesarstone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Apogee Enterprises pays out 25.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Apogee Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caesarstone quarterly revenues are $99.6M, which are smaller than Apogee Enterprises quarterly revenues of $345.7M. Caesarstone's net income of -$12.9M is lower than Apogee Enterprises's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Caesarstone's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Apogee Enterprises's PE ratio is 10.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caesarstone is 0.18x versus 0.66x for Apogee Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Armstrong World Industries has a net margin of -12.94% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of 18.06%. Caesarstone's return on equity of -17.3% beat Armstrong World Industries's return on equity of 38.46%.

Caesarstone has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 131.48%. On the other hand Armstrong World Industries has an analysts' consensus of $160.75 which suggests that it could grow by 5.67%. Given that Caesarstone has higher upside potential than Armstrong World Industries, analysts believe Caesarstone is more attractive than Armstrong World Industries.

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.473% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.359, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.891%.

Caesarstone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Armstrong World Industries offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Caesarstone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries pays out 19.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caesarstone quarterly revenues are $99.6M, which are smaller than Armstrong World Industries quarterly revenues of $382.7M. Caesarstone's net income of -$12.9M is lower than Armstrong World Industries's net income of $69.1M. Notably, Caesarstone's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Armstrong World Industries's PE ratio is 24.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caesarstone is 0.18x versus 4.45x for Armstrong World Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Identiv has a net margin of -12.94% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -5.3%. Caesarstone's return on equity of -17.3% beat Identiv's return on equity of 71.9%.

Caesarstone has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 131.48%. On the other hand Identiv has an analysts' consensus of $5.83 which suggests that it could grow by 84.6%. Given that Caesarstone has higher upside potential than Identiv, analysts believe Caesarstone is more attractive than Identiv.

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.473% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Identiv has a beta of 1.507, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.719%.

Caesarstone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Identiv offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Caesarstone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Identiv pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Caesarstone quarterly revenues are $99.6M, which are larger than Identiv quarterly revenues of $6.7M. Caesarstone's net income of -$12.9M is lower than Identiv's net income of -$355K. Notably, Caesarstone's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Identiv's PE ratio is 1.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caesarstone is 0.18x versus 1.75x for Identiv. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southland Holdings has a net margin of -12.94% compared to Caesarstone's net margin of -1.56%. Caesarstone's return on equity of -17.3% beat Southland Holdings's return on equity of -49.21%.

Caesarstone has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 131.48%. On the other hand Southland Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 28.57%. Given that Caesarstone has higher upside potential than Southland Holdings, analysts believe Caesarstone is more attractive than Southland Holdings.

Caesarstone has a beta of 0.345, which suggesting that the stock is 65.473% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Caesarstone has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Southland Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Caesarstone pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Southland Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Caesarstone quarterly revenues are $99.6M, which are smaller than Southland Holdings quarterly revenues of $267.3M. Caesarstone's net income of -$12.9M is lower than Southland Holdings's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Caesarstone's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Southland Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caesarstone is 0.18x versus 0.17x for Southland Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.