CSTE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -17.71% compared to Caesarstone Ltd.'s net margin of 20.3%. Caesarstone Ltd.'s return on equity of -28.18% beat Armstrong World Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 38.23%.

Caesarstone Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 94.18%. On the other hand Armstrong World Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $211.10 which suggests that it could grow by 5.28%. Given that Caesarstone Ltd. has higher upside potential than Armstrong World Industries, Inc., analysts believe Caesarstone Ltd. is more attractive than Armstrong World Industries, Inc..

Caesarstone Ltd. has a beta of -0.096, which suggesting that the stock is 109.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Armstrong World Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.320, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.022%.

Caesarstone Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Caesarstone Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. pays out 19.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Caesarstone Ltd. quarterly revenues are $102.1M, which are smaller than Armstrong World Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $425.2M. Caesarstone Ltd.'s net income of -$18.1M is lower than Armstrong World Industries, Inc.'s net income of $86.3M. Notably, Caesarstone Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Armstrong World Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 28.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caesarstone Ltd. is 0.18x versus 5.48x for Armstrong World Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Identiv, Inc. has a net margin of -17.71% compared to Caesarstone Ltd.'s net margin of -68.9%. Caesarstone Ltd.'s return on equity of -28.18% beat Identiv, Inc.'s return on equity of -12.35%.

Caesarstone Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 94.18%. On the other hand Identiv, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $5.33 which suggests that it could grow by 48.98%. Given that Caesarstone Ltd. has higher upside potential than Identiv, Inc., analysts believe Caesarstone Ltd. is more attractive than Identiv, Inc..

Caesarstone Ltd. has a beta of -0.096, which suggesting that the stock is 109.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Identiv, Inc. has a beta of 1.427, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.674%.

Caesarstone Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Identiv, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Caesarstone Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Identiv, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Caesarstone Ltd. quarterly revenues are $102.1M, which are larger than Identiv, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5M. Caesarstone Ltd.'s net income of -$18.1M is lower than Identiv, Inc.'s net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Caesarstone Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Identiv, Inc.'s PE ratio is 1.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caesarstone Ltd. is 0.18x versus 3.86x for Identiv, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southland Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -17.71% compared to Caesarstone Ltd.'s net margin of -36.08%. Caesarstone Ltd.'s return on equity of -28.18% beat Southland Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -60.76%.

Caesarstone Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 94.18%. On the other hand Southland Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.33 which suggests that it could grow by 91.34%. Given that Caesarstone Ltd. has higher upside potential than Southland Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Caesarstone Ltd. is more attractive than Southland Holdings, Inc..

Caesarstone Ltd. has a beta of -0.096, which suggesting that the stock is 109.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southland Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Caesarstone Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Southland Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Caesarstone Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Southland Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Caesarstone Ltd. quarterly revenues are $102.1M, which are smaller than Southland Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $213.3M. Caesarstone Ltd.'s net income of -$18.1M is higher than Southland Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$77M. Notably, Caesarstone Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Southland Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caesarstone Ltd. is 0.18x versus 0.19x for Southland Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Safety Products, Inc. has a net margin of -17.71% compared to Caesarstone Ltd.'s net margin of -131.55%. Caesarstone Ltd.'s return on equity of -28.18% beat Universal Safety Products, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.48%.

Caesarstone Ltd. has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 94.18%. On the other hand Universal Safety Products, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Caesarstone Ltd. has higher upside potential than Universal Safety Products, Inc., analysts believe Caesarstone Ltd. is more attractive than Universal Safety Products, Inc..

Caesarstone Ltd. has a beta of -0.096, which suggesting that the stock is 109.633% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Safety Products, Inc. has a beta of -0.410, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 140.984%.

Caesarstone Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Universal Safety Products, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Caesarstone Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Safety Products, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Caesarstone Ltd. quarterly revenues are $102.1M, which are larger than Universal Safety Products, Inc. quarterly revenues of $760K. Caesarstone Ltd.'s net income of -$18.1M is lower than Universal Safety Products, Inc.'s net income of -$999.8K. Notably, Caesarstone Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Universal Safety Products, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Caesarstone Ltd. is 0.18x versus 0.71x for Universal Safety Products, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.