INVE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Apogee Enterprises has a net margin of -92.21% compared to Identiv's net margin of 9.35%. Identiv's return on equity of 83.4% beat Apogee Enterprises's return on equity of 23.8%.

Identiv has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 93.69%. On the other hand Apogee Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $59.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.44%. Given that Identiv has higher upside potential than Apogee Enterprises, analysts believe Identiv is more attractive than Apogee Enterprises.

Identiv has a beta of 1.353, which suggesting that the stock is 35.332% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Apogee Enterprises has a beta of 0.994, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.593%.

Identiv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Apogee Enterprises offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Identiv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Apogee Enterprises pays out 21.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Apogee Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Identiv quarterly revenues are $6.5M, which are smaller than Apogee Enterprises quarterly revenues of $331.5M. Identiv's net income of $85.9M is higher than Apogee Enterprises's net income of $31M. Notably, Identiv's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.21x while Apogee Enterprises's PE ratio is 15.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Identiv is 0.72x versus 1.14x for Apogee Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Armstrong World Industries has a net margin of -92.21% compared to Identiv's net margin of 19.89%. Identiv's return on equity of 83.4% beat Armstrong World Industries's return on equity of 39.11%.

Identiv has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 93.69%. On the other hand Armstrong World Industries has an analysts' consensus of $119.68 which suggests that it could grow by 6.03%. Given that Identiv has higher upside potential than Armstrong World Industries, analysts believe Identiv is more attractive than Armstrong World Industries.

Identiv has a beta of 1.353, which suggesting that the stock is 35.332% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.156, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.629%.

Identiv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Armstrong World Industries offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Identiv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries pays out 20.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Identiv quarterly revenues are $6.5M, which are smaller than Armstrong World Industries quarterly revenues of $386.6M. Identiv's net income of $85.9M is higher than Armstrong World Industries's net income of $76.9M. Notably, Identiv's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.21x while Armstrong World Industries's PE ratio is 25.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Identiv is 0.72x versus 4.53x for Armstrong World Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southland Holdings has a net margin of -92.21% compared to Identiv's net margin of -31.58%. Identiv's return on equity of 83.4% beat Southland Holdings's return on equity of -45.97%.

Identiv has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 93.69%. On the other hand Southland Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 18.72%. Given that Identiv has higher upside potential than Southland Holdings, analysts believe Identiv is more attractive than Southland Holdings.

Identiv has a beta of 1.353, which suggesting that the stock is 35.332% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Identiv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Southland Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Identiv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Southland Holdings pays out -0.57% of its earnings as a dividend.

Identiv quarterly revenues are $6.5M, which are smaller than Southland Holdings quarterly revenues of $173.3M. Identiv's net income of $85.9M is higher than Southland Holdings's net income of -$54.7M. Notably, Identiv's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.21x while Southland Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Identiv is 0.72x versus 0.17x for Southland Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Interface has a net margin of -92.21% compared to Identiv's net margin of 8.26%. Identiv's return on equity of 83.4% beat Interface's return on equity of 19.3%.

Identiv has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 93.69%. On the other hand Interface has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 20.92%. Given that Identiv has higher upside potential than Interface, analysts believe Identiv is more attractive than Interface.

Identiv has a beta of 1.353, which suggesting that the stock is 35.332% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interface has a beta of 2.092, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.177%.

Identiv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Interface offers a yield of 0.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Identiv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Interface pays out 5.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Interface's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Identiv quarterly revenues are $6.5M, which are smaller than Interface quarterly revenues of $344.3M. Identiv's net income of $85.9M is higher than Interface's net income of $28.4M. Notably, Identiv's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.21x while Interface's PE ratio is 17.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Identiv is 0.72x versus 1.10x for Interface. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.