RUSHB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AutoNation has a net margin of 4.17% compared to Rush Enterprises's net margin of 2.82%. Rush Enterprises's return on equity of 15.54% beat AutoNation's return on equity of 32.05%.

Rush Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AutoNation has an analysts' consensus of $197.64 which suggests that it could grow by 16.7%. Given that AutoNation has higher upside potential than Rush Enterprises, analysts believe AutoNation is more attractive than Rush Enterprises.

Rush Enterprises has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.17% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AutoNation has a beta of 1.258, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.816%.

Rush Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.29%. AutoNation offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rush Enterprises pays 14.58% of its earnings as a dividend. AutoNation pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rush Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rush Enterprises quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than AutoNation quarterly revenues of $6.6B. Rush Enterprises's net income of $79.1M is lower than AutoNation's net income of $185.8M. Notably, Rush Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.36x while AutoNation's PE ratio is 9.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rush Enterprises is 0.56x versus 0.27x for AutoNation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lithia Motors has a net margin of 4.17% compared to Rush Enterprises's net margin of 2.27%. Rush Enterprises's return on equity of 15.54% beat Lithia Motors's return on equity of 12.55%.

Rush Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lithia Motors has an analysts' consensus of $397.40 which suggests that it could grow by 14.21%. Given that Lithia Motors has higher upside potential than Rush Enterprises, analysts believe Lithia Motors is more attractive than Rush Enterprises.

Rush Enterprises has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.17% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lithia Motors has a beta of 1.674, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.445%.

Rush Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.29%. Lithia Motors offers a yield of 0.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Rush Enterprises pays 14.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Lithia Motors pays out 5.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rush Enterprises quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Lithia Motors quarterly revenues of $9.2B. Rush Enterprises's net income of $79.1M is lower than Lithia Motors's net income of $209.1M. Notably, Rush Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.36x while Lithia Motors's PE ratio is 11.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rush Enterprises is 0.56x versus 0.27x for Lithia Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Penske Automotive Group has a net margin of 4.17% compared to Rush Enterprises's net margin of 2.98%. Rush Enterprises's return on equity of 15.54% beat Penske Automotive Group's return on equity of 17.91%.

Rush Enterprises has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Penske Automotive Group has an analysts' consensus of $171.25 which suggests that it could grow by 13.64%. Given that Penske Automotive Group has higher upside potential than Rush Enterprises, analysts believe Penske Automotive Group is more attractive than Rush Enterprises.

Rush Enterprises has a beta of 1.002, which suggesting that the stock is 0.17% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Penske Automotive Group has a beta of 1.199, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.858%.

Rush Enterprises has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.29%. Penske Automotive Group offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.19 per share. Rush Enterprises pays 14.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Penske Automotive Group pays out 17.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rush Enterprises quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Penske Automotive Group quarterly revenues of $7.6B. Rush Enterprises's net income of $79.1M is lower than Penske Automotive Group's net income of $226.1M. Notably, Rush Enterprises's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.36x while Penske Automotive Group's PE ratio is 11.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rush Enterprises is 0.56x versus 0.34x for Penske Automotive Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.