RRBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bar Harbor Bankshares has a net margin of 32.83% compared to Red River Bancshares's net margin of 29.5%. Red River Bancshares's return on equity of 11.01% beat Bar Harbor Bankshares's return on equity of 9.79%.

Red River Bancshares has a consensus price target of $69.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.71%. On the other hand Bar Harbor Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $36.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.01%. Given that Red River Bancshares has higher upside potential than Bar Harbor Bankshares, analysts believe Red River Bancshares is more attractive than Bar Harbor Bankshares.

Red River Bancshares has a beta of 0.647, which suggesting that the stock is 35.335% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bar Harbor Bankshares has a beta of 0.710, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.005%.

Red River Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Bar Harbor Bankshares offers a yield of 4.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Red River Bancshares pays 7.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Bar Harbor Bankshares pays out 40.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red River Bancshares quarterly revenues are $28.3M, which are smaller than Bar Harbor Bankshares quarterly revenues of $37.3M. Red River Bancshares's net income of $9.3M is lower than Bar Harbor Bankshares's net income of $11M. Notably, Red River Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.33x while Bar Harbor Bankshares's PE ratio is 10.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red River Bancshares is 3.26x versus 3.04x for Bar Harbor Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 32.83% compared to Red River Bancshares's net margin of 20.42%. Red River Bancshares's return on equity of 11.01% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 6.65%.

Red River Bancshares has a consensus price target of $69.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.71%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $50.05 which suggests that it could grow by 29.16%. Given that Red River Bancshares has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe Red River Bancshares is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

Red River Bancshares has a beta of 0.647, which suggesting that the stock is 35.335% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.973, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.735%.

Red River Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Red River Bancshares pays 7.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red River Bancshares quarterly revenues are $28.3M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18.3M. Red River Bancshares's net income of $9.3M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $3.7M. Notably, Red River Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.33x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 18.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red River Bancshares is 3.26x versus 3.10x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 32.83% compared to Red River Bancshares's net margin of 28.72%. Red River Bancshares's return on equity of 11.01% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.67%.

Red River Bancshares has a consensus price target of $69.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.71%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $173.67 which suggests that it could grow by 13.85%. Given that Red River Bancshares has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Red River Bancshares is more attractive than Park National.

Red River Bancshares has a beta of 0.647, which suggesting that the stock is 35.335% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.722, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.832%.

Red River Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Park National offers a yield of 2.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Red River Bancshares pays 7.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red River Bancshares quarterly revenues are $28.3M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $134.5M. Red River Bancshares's net income of $9.3M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.6M. Notably, Red River Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.33x while Park National's PE ratio is 16.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red River Bancshares is 3.26x versus 4.76x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 32.83% compared to Red River Bancshares's net margin of 25.81%. Red River Bancshares's return on equity of 11.01% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.27%.

Red River Bancshares has a consensus price target of $69.00, signalling upside risk potential of 34.71%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $76.50 which suggests that it could grow by 20.99%. Given that Red River Bancshares has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial, analysts believe Red River Bancshares is more attractive than Tompkins Financial.

Red River Bancshares has a beta of 0.647, which suggesting that the stock is 35.335% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.729, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.136%.

Red River Bancshares has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Red River Bancshares pays 7.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red River Bancshares quarterly revenues are $28.3M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $76.2M. Red River Bancshares's net income of $9.3M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Red River Bancshares's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.33x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red River Bancshares is 3.26x versus 3.06x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.