RPAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of -5.26% compared to Repay Holdings's net margin of 24.04%. Repay Holdings's return on equity of -1.26% beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 78.53%.

Repay Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 128.43%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $309.08 which suggests that it could grow by 0.44%. Given that Repay Holdings has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Repay Holdings is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Repay Holdings has a beta of 1.614, which suggesting that the stock is 61.403% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.48%.

Repay Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Repay Holdings pays -23.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Repay Holdings quarterly revenues are $78.3M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Repay Holdings's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Repay Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 31.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Repay Holdings is 1.18x versus 6.61x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk has a net margin of -5.26% compared to Repay Holdings's net margin of 18.49%. Repay Holdings's return on equity of -1.26% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

Repay Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 128.43%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $320.15 which suggests that it could grow by 11.36%. Given that Repay Holdings has higher upside potential than Autodesk, analysts believe Repay Holdings is more attractive than Autodesk.

Repay Holdings has a beta of 1.614, which suggesting that the stock is 61.403% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.828%.

Repay Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Repay Holdings pays -23.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Repay Holdings quarterly revenues are $78.3M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Repay Holdings's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, Repay Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk's PE ratio is 56.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Repay Holdings is 1.18x versus 10.18x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Agilysys has a net margin of -5.26% compared to Repay Holdings's net margin of 5.51%. Repay Holdings's return on equity of -1.26% beat Agilysys's return on equity of 8.99%.

Repay Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 128.43%. On the other hand Agilysys has an analysts' consensus of $122.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.67%. Given that Repay Holdings has higher upside potential than Agilysys, analysts believe Repay Holdings is more attractive than Agilysys.

Repay Holdings has a beta of 1.614, which suggesting that the stock is 61.403% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agilysys has a beta of 0.579, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.051%.

Repay Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agilysys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Repay Holdings pays -23.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys pays out 1.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Repay Holdings quarterly revenues are $78.3M, which are larger than Agilysys quarterly revenues of $69.6M. Repay Holdings's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Agilysys's net income of $3.8M. Notably, Repay Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Agilysys's PE ratio is 101.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Repay Holdings is 1.18x versus 8.65x for Agilysys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -5.26% compared to Repay Holdings's net margin of 0.54%. Repay Holdings's return on equity of -1.26% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29%.

Repay Holdings has a consensus price target of $9.00, signalling upside risk potential of 128.43%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.44 which suggests that it could grow by 252.33%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Repay Holdings, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Repay Holdings.

Repay Holdings has a beta of 1.614, which suggesting that the stock is 61.403% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.643%.

Repay Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Repay Holdings pays -23.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Repay Holdings quarterly revenues are $78.3M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.2M. Repay Holdings's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Inuvo's net income of $141.3K. Notably, Repay Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Repay Holdings is 1.18x versus 0.68x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.