RPAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has a net margin of -8.51% compared to Repay Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 19.57%. Repay Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -17.75% beat Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s return on equity of 71.7%.

Repay Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.71, signalling upside risk potential of 107.93%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $289.54 which suggests that it could grow by 12.66%. Given that Repay Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, Inc., analysts believe Repay Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing, Inc..

Repay Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.678, which suggesting that the stock is 67.801% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has a beta of 0.857, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.307%.

Repay Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing, Inc. offers a yield of 2.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Repay Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing, Inc. pays out 60.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Repay Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $77.7M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Repay Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$6.6M is lower than Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s net income of $1B. Notably, Repay Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Repay Holdings Corp. is 1.05x versus 5.04x for Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk, Inc. has a net margin of -8.51% compared to Repay Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 18.5%. Repay Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -17.75% beat Autodesk, Inc.'s return on equity of 41.26%.

Repay Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.71, signalling upside risk potential of 107.93%. On the other hand Autodesk, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $366.13 which suggests that it could grow by 23.04%. Given that Repay Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Autodesk, Inc., analysts believe Repay Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Autodesk, Inc..

Repay Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.678, which suggesting that the stock is 67.801% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk, Inc. has a beta of 1.471, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.111%.

Repay Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Repay Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Repay Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $77.7M, which are smaller than Autodesk, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Repay Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$6.6M is lower than Autodesk, Inc.'s net income of $343M. Notably, Repay Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk, Inc.'s PE ratio is 57.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Repay Holdings Corp. is 1.05x versus 9.37x for Autodesk, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Agilysys, Inc. has a net margin of -8.51% compared to Repay Holdings Corp.'s net margin of 14.77%. Repay Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -17.75% beat Agilysys, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.94%.

Repay Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.71, signalling upside risk potential of 107.93%. On the other hand Agilysys, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $142.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.97%. Given that Repay Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than Agilysys, Inc., analysts believe Repay Holdings Corp. is more attractive than Agilysys, Inc..

Repay Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.678, which suggesting that the stock is 67.801% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agilysys, Inc. has a beta of 0.419, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.053%.

Repay Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agilysys, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Repay Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Repay Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $77.7M, which are smaller than Agilysys, Inc. quarterly revenues of $79.3M. Repay Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$6.6M is lower than Agilysys, Inc.'s net income of $11.7M. Notably, Repay Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Agilysys, Inc.'s PE ratio is 140.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Repay Holdings Corp. is 1.05x versus 11.38x for Agilysys, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo, Inc. has a net margin of -8.51% compared to Repay Holdings Corp.'s net margin of -7.71%. Repay Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -17.75% beat Inuvo, Inc.'s return on equity of -35.27%.

Repay Holdings Corp. has a consensus price target of $7.71, signalling upside risk potential of 107.93%. On the other hand Inuvo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.88 which suggests that it could grow by 310.38%. Given that Inuvo, Inc. has higher upside potential than Repay Holdings Corp., analysts believe Inuvo, Inc. is more attractive than Repay Holdings Corp..

Repay Holdings Corp. has a beta of 1.678, which suggesting that the stock is 67.801% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo, Inc. has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.66%.

Repay Holdings Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Repay Holdings Corp. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Repay Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues are $77.7M, which are larger than Inuvo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22.6M. Repay Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$6.6M is lower than Inuvo, Inc.'s net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Repay Holdings Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Repay Holdings Corp. is 1.05x versus 2.11x for Inuvo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.