RDIB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cineverse Corp. has a net margin of -8.25% compared to Reading International, Inc.'s net margin of -44.87%. Reading International, Inc.'s return on equity of -729.14% beat Cineverse Corp.'s return on equity of -2.95%.

Reading International, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cineverse Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 230.4%. Given that Cineverse Corp. has higher upside potential than Reading International, Inc., analysts believe Cineverse Corp. is more attractive than Reading International, Inc..

Reading International, Inc. has a beta of 0.013, which suggesting that the stock is 98.655% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cineverse Corp. has a beta of 1.481, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.127%.

Reading International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cineverse Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Reading International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cineverse Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Reading International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $52.2M, which are larger than Cineverse Corp. quarterly revenues of $12.4M. Reading International, Inc.'s net income of -$4.3M is higher than Cineverse Corp.'s net income of -$5.5M. Notably, Reading International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cineverse Corp.'s PE ratio is 17.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reading International, Inc. is 1.18x versus 0.51x for Cineverse Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netflix, Inc. has a net margin of -8.25% compared to Reading International, Inc.'s net margin of 21.88%. Reading International, Inc.'s return on equity of -729.14% beat Netflix, Inc.'s return on equity of 42.61%.

Reading International, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Netflix, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $127.46 which suggests that it could grow by 35.92%. Given that Netflix, Inc. has higher upside potential than Reading International, Inc., analysts believe Netflix, Inc. is more attractive than Reading International, Inc..

Reading International, Inc. has a beta of 0.013, which suggesting that the stock is 98.655% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix, Inc. has a beta of 1.707, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.706%.

Reading International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Netflix, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Reading International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Reading International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $52.2M, which are smaller than Netflix, Inc. quarterly revenues of $11.6B. Reading International, Inc.'s net income of -$4.3M is lower than Netflix, Inc.'s net income of $2.5B. Notably, Reading International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Netflix, Inc.'s PE ratio is 39.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reading International, Inc. is 1.18x versus 9.43x for Netflix, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Skydance Corp. has a net margin of -8.25% compared to Reading International, Inc.'s net margin of 2.9%. Reading International, Inc.'s return on equity of -729.14% beat Paramount Skydance Corp.'s return on equity of 1.2%.

Reading International, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Paramount Skydance Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $14.93 which suggests that it could grow by 6.71%. Given that Paramount Skydance Corp. has higher upside potential than Reading International, Inc., analysts believe Paramount Skydance Corp. is more attractive than Reading International, Inc..

Reading International, Inc. has a beta of 0.013, which suggesting that the stock is 98.655% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Skydance Corp. has a beta of 1.164, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.424%.

Reading International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Skydance Corp. offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Reading International, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Skydance Corp. pays out 2.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Skydance Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reading International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $52.2M, which are smaller than Paramount Skydance Corp. quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Reading International, Inc.'s net income of -$4.3M is lower than Paramount Skydance Corp.'s net income of $194M. Notably, Reading International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Skydance Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reading International, Inc. is 1.18x versus 0.38x for Paramount Skydance Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.