RCAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has a net margin of -166.04% compared to Red Cat Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 2.5%. Red Cat Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -75.19% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s return on equity of 1.25%.

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 87.03%. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $100.56 which suggests that it could grow by 31.45%. Given that Red Cat Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc., analysts believe Red Cat Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc..

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.631, which suggesting that the stock is 63.109% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. has a beta of 1.144, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.421%.

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $9.6M, which are smaller than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. quarterly revenues of $347.6M. Red Cat Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$16M is lower than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s net income of $8.7M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.'s PE ratio is 623.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. is 44.10x versus 9.54x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mercury Systems, Inc. has a net margin of -166.04% compared to Red Cat Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -5.56%. Red Cat Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -75.19% beat Mercury Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -2.25%.

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 87.03%. On the other hand Mercury Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $86.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.85%. Given that Red Cat Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, Inc., analysts believe Red Cat Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Mercury Systems, Inc..

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.631, which suggesting that the stock is 63.109% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mercury Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.837, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.346%.

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mercury Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercury Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $9.6M, which are smaller than Mercury Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $225.2M. Red Cat Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$16M is lower than Mercury Systems, Inc.'s net income of -$12.5M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mercury Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. is 44.10x versus 4.47x for Mercury Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park Aerospace Corp. has a net margin of -166.04% compared to Red Cat Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 14.68%. Red Cat Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -75.19% beat Park Aerospace Corp.'s return on equity of 6.82%.

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $15.00, signalling upside risk potential of 87.03%. On the other hand Park Aerospace Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32.92%. Given that Red Cat Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Park Aerospace Corp., analysts believe Red Cat Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Park Aerospace Corp..

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.631, which suggesting that the stock is 63.109% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park Aerospace Corp. has a beta of 0.328, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.228%.

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park Aerospace Corp. offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Red Cat Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park Aerospace Corp. pays out 171.64% of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $9.6M, which are smaller than Park Aerospace Corp. quarterly revenues of $16.4M. Red Cat Holdings, Inc.'s net income of -$16M is lower than Park Aerospace Corp.'s net income of $2.4M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park Aerospace Corp.'s PE ratio is 53.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. is 44.10x versus 6.20x for Park Aerospace Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.