RCAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lumentum Holdings has a net margin of -868.86% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of -10.37%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51% beat Lumentum Holdings's return on equity of -46%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.33, signalling upside risk potential of 133.92%. On the other hand Lumentum Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $84.44 which suggests that it could grow by 28.6%. Given that Red Cat Holdings has higher upside potential than Lumentum Holdings, analysts believe Red Cat Holdings is more attractive than Lumentum Holdings.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.334% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lumentum Holdings has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.677%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lumentum Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lumentum Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than Lumentum Holdings quarterly revenues of $425.2M. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M is higher than Lumentum Holdings's net income of -$44.1M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lumentum Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 24.28x versus 3.06x for Lumentum Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rigetti Computing has a net margin of -868.86% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of -6726.52%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51% beat Rigetti Computing's return on equity of -168.4%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.33, signalling upside risk potential of 133.92%. On the other hand Rigetti Computing has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 43.55%. Given that Red Cat Holdings has higher upside potential than Rigetti Computing, analysts believe Red Cat Holdings is more attractive than Rigetti Computing.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.334% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rigetti Computing has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rigetti Computing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rigetti Computing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than Rigetti Computing quarterly revenues of $2.3M. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M is higher than Rigetti Computing's net income of -$153M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rigetti Computing's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 24.28x versus 176.49x for Rigetti Computing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stratasys has a net margin of -868.86% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of -27.9%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51% beat Stratasys's return on equity of -14.23%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.33, signalling upside risk potential of 133.92%. On the other hand Stratasys has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.79%. Given that Red Cat Holdings has higher upside potential than Stratasys, analysts believe Red Cat Holdings is more attractive than Stratasys.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.334% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stratasys has a beta of 1.499, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.871%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Stratasys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Stratasys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than Stratasys quarterly revenues of $150.4M. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M is higher than Stratasys's net income of -$41.9M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stratasys's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 24.28x versus 1.38x for Stratasys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AgEagle Aerial Systems has a net margin of -868.86% compared to Red Cat Holdings's net margin of -105.32%. Red Cat Holdings's return on equity of -96.51% beat AgEagle Aerial Systems's return on equity of -275.7%.

Red Cat Holdings has a consensus price target of $13.33, signalling upside risk potential of 133.92%. On the other hand AgEagle Aerial Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1954.12%. Given that AgEagle Aerial Systems has higher upside potential than Red Cat Holdings, analysts believe AgEagle Aerial Systems is more attractive than Red Cat Holdings.

Red Cat Holdings has a beta of 0.637, which suggesting that the stock is 36.334% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AgEagle Aerial Systems has a beta of 3.189, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 218.852%.

Red Cat Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AgEagle Aerial Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Cat Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AgEagle Aerial Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Red Cat Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.5M, which are smaller than AgEagle Aerial Systems quarterly revenues of $3.3M. Red Cat Holdings's net income of -$13.3M is lower than AgEagle Aerial Systems's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, Red Cat Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AgEagle Aerial Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Cat Holdings is 24.28x versus 0.18x for AgEagle Aerial Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.