Financhill
Buy
58

PSHG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$1.57
Seasonality move :
-14.1%
Day range:
$1.54 - $1.59
52-week range:
$1.31 - $2.58
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
1.42x
P/S ratio:
0.71x
P/B ratio:
0.07x
Volume:
16.4K
Avg. volume:
48.3K
1-year change:
-29.98%
Market cap:
$19.8M
Revenue:
$87.4M
EPS (TTM):
$1.12

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
PSHG
Performance Shipping
$22.3M -- -0.14% -- $5.75
CCEC
Capital Clean Energy Carriers
$105.8M $0.36 10.15% -32.9% $23.00
EDRY
EuroDry
$11.1M -$1.25 -23.25% -92.31% $20.67
ESEA
Euroseas
$53.9M $3.09 15.37% 7.55% $53.67
GLBS
Globus Maritime
$10.7M -- 38.73% -- $4.00
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers
$164.3M -$0.28 72.39% -38286.54% $19.70
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
PSHG
Performance Shipping
$1.59 $5.75 $19.8M 1.42x $0.00 0% 0.71x
CCEC
Capital Clean Energy Carriers
$20.53 $23.00 $1.2B 8.02x $0.15 2.92% 2.79x
EDRY
EuroDry
$8.76 $20.67 $24.8M -- $0.00 0% 0.39x
ESEA
Euroseas
$35.34 $53.67 $249.1M 2.19x $0.53 5.64% 1.16x
GLBS
Globus Maritime
$1.18 $4.00 $24.2M 58.75x $0.00 0% 0.69x
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers
$15.52 $19.70 $1.8B 5.85x $0.09 13.79% 1.33x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
PSHG
Performance Shipping
14.71% -0.596 205.24% 5.43x
CCEC
Capital Clean Energy Carriers
100% 0.154 240.53% 1.42x
EDRY
EuroDry
51.81% 0.549 264.58% 1.03x
ESEA
Euroseas
36.14% -0.329 99.06% 1.38x
GLBS
Globus Maritime
32.57% 1.878 353.87% 1.39x
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers
33.61% 0.581 71.44% 1.31x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
PSHG
Performance Shipping
$11.4M $8.9M 14.31% 17.18% 44.86% $12.1M
CCEC
Capital Clean Energy Carriers
$60.7M $56.4M 8.43% 15.62% 54.7% $63.2M
EDRY
EuroDry
$3.2M $1.3M -4.49% -8.42% -8.52% -$8.6M
ESEA
Euroseas
$30.6M $26.6M 22.72% 35.8% 52.34% $14.5M
GLBS
Globus Maritime
-$2.3M -$890K 0.18% 0.24% -1.23% -$34.6M
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers
$74.1M $55.5M 8.88% 14.09% 20.68% $68.9M

Performance Shipping vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns PSHG or CCEC?

    Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a net margin of 44.76% compared to Performance Shipping's net margin of 97.28%. Performance Shipping's return on equity of 17.18% beat Capital Clean Energy Carriers's return on equity of 15.62%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PSHG
    Performance Shipping
    52.41% $0.25 $322.7M
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers
    57.7% $1.74 $2.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About PSHG or CCEC?

    Performance Shipping has a consensus price target of $5.75, signalling upside risk potential of 261.77%. On the other hand Capital Clean Energy Carriers has an analysts' consensus of $23.00 which suggests that it could grow by 12.03%. Given that Performance Shipping has higher upside potential than Capital Clean Energy Carriers, analysts believe Performance Shipping is more attractive than Capital Clean Energy Carriers.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PSHG
    Performance Shipping
    1 0 0
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers
    2 2 0
  • Is PSHG or CCEC More Risky?

    Performance Shipping has a beta of -0.237, which suggesting that the stock is 123.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Capital Clean Energy Carriers has a beta of 0.301, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.931%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PSHG or CCEC?

    Performance Shipping has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Capital Clean Energy Carriers offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Performance Shipping pays 4.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Capital Clean Energy Carriers pays out 17.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PSHG or CCEC?

    Performance Shipping quarterly revenues are $21.7M, which are smaller than Capital Clean Energy Carriers quarterly revenues of $105.1M. Performance Shipping's net income of $9.7M is lower than Capital Clean Energy Carriers's net income of $102.3M. Notably, Performance Shipping's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.42x while Capital Clean Energy Carriers's PE ratio is 8.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Shipping is 0.71x versus 2.79x for Capital Clean Energy Carriers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PSHG
    Performance Shipping
    0.71x 1.42x $21.7M $9.7M
    CCEC
    Capital Clean Energy Carriers
    2.79x 8.02x $105.1M $102.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns PSHG or EDRY?

    EuroDry has a net margin of 44.76% compared to Performance Shipping's net margin of -22.64%. Performance Shipping's return on equity of 17.18% beat EuroDry's return on equity of -8.42%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PSHG
    Performance Shipping
    52.41% $0.25 $322.7M
    EDRY
    EuroDry
    21.75% -$1.20 $215.7M
  • What do Analysts Say About PSHG or EDRY?

    Performance Shipping has a consensus price target of $5.75, signalling upside risk potential of 261.77%. On the other hand EuroDry has an analysts' consensus of $20.67 which suggests that it could grow by 135.88%. Given that Performance Shipping has higher upside potential than EuroDry, analysts believe Performance Shipping is more attractive than EuroDry.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PSHG
    Performance Shipping
    1 0 0
    EDRY
    EuroDry
    1 1 0
  • Is PSHG or EDRY More Risky?

    Performance Shipping has a beta of -0.237, which suggesting that the stock is 123.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EuroDry has a beta of 0.866, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.404%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PSHG or EDRY?

    Performance Shipping has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EuroDry offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Performance Shipping pays 4.19% of its earnings as a dividend. EuroDry pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Performance Shipping's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PSHG or EDRY?

    Performance Shipping quarterly revenues are $21.7M, which are larger than EuroDry quarterly revenues of $14.5M. Performance Shipping's net income of $9.7M is higher than EuroDry's net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Performance Shipping's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.42x while EuroDry's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Shipping is 0.71x versus 0.39x for EuroDry. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PSHG
    Performance Shipping
    0.71x 1.42x $21.7M $9.7M
    EDRY
    EuroDry
    0.39x -- $14.5M -$3.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns PSHG or ESEA?

    Euroseas has a net margin of 44.76% compared to Performance Shipping's net margin of 45.76%. Performance Shipping's return on equity of 17.18% beat Euroseas's return on equity of 35.8%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PSHG
    Performance Shipping
    52.41% $0.25 $322.7M
    ESEA
    Euroseas
    57.41% $3.49 $568.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About PSHG or ESEA?

    Performance Shipping has a consensus price target of $5.75, signalling upside risk potential of 261.77%. On the other hand Euroseas has an analysts' consensus of $53.67 which suggests that it could grow by 51.86%. Given that Performance Shipping has higher upside potential than Euroseas, analysts believe Performance Shipping is more attractive than Euroseas.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PSHG
    Performance Shipping
    1 0 0
    ESEA
    Euroseas
    2 0 0
  • Is PSHG or ESEA More Risky?

    Performance Shipping has a beta of -0.237, which suggesting that the stock is 123.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euroseas has a beta of 0.740, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.024%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PSHG or ESEA?

    Performance Shipping has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Euroseas offers a yield of 5.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Performance Shipping pays 4.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Euroseas pays out 14.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PSHG or ESEA?

    Performance Shipping quarterly revenues are $21.7M, which are smaller than Euroseas quarterly revenues of $53.3M. Performance Shipping's net income of $9.7M is lower than Euroseas's net income of $24.4M. Notably, Performance Shipping's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.42x while Euroseas's PE ratio is 2.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Shipping is 0.71x versus 1.16x for Euroseas. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PSHG
    Performance Shipping
    0.71x 1.42x $21.7M $9.7M
    ESEA
    Euroseas
    1.16x 2.19x $53.3M $24.4M
  • Which has Higher Returns PSHG or GLBS?

    Globus Maritime has a net margin of 44.76% compared to Performance Shipping's net margin of -23%. Performance Shipping's return on equity of 17.18% beat Globus Maritime's return on equity of 0.24%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PSHG
    Performance Shipping
    52.41% $0.25 $322.7M
    GLBS
    Globus Maritime
    -26.53% -$0.10 $261.6M
  • What do Analysts Say About PSHG or GLBS?

    Performance Shipping has a consensus price target of $5.75, signalling upside risk potential of 261.77%. On the other hand Globus Maritime has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 240.43%. Given that Performance Shipping has higher upside potential than Globus Maritime, analysts believe Performance Shipping is more attractive than Globus Maritime.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PSHG
    Performance Shipping
    1 0 0
    GLBS
    Globus Maritime
    0 0 0
  • Is PSHG or GLBS More Risky?

    Performance Shipping has a beta of -0.237, which suggesting that the stock is 123.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globus Maritime has a beta of 0.511, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.887%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PSHG or GLBS?

    Performance Shipping has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Globus Maritime offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Performance Shipping pays 4.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Globus Maritime pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Performance Shipping's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PSHG or GLBS?

    Performance Shipping quarterly revenues are $21.7M, which are larger than Globus Maritime quarterly revenues of $8.7M. Performance Shipping's net income of $9.7M is higher than Globus Maritime's net income of -$2M. Notably, Performance Shipping's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.42x while Globus Maritime's PE ratio is 58.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Shipping is 0.71x versus 0.69x for Globus Maritime. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PSHG
    Performance Shipping
    0.71x 1.42x $21.7M $9.7M
    GLBS
    Globus Maritime
    0.69x 58.75x $8.7M -$2M
  • Which has Higher Returns PSHG or SBLK?

    Star Bulk Carriers has a net margin of 44.76% compared to Performance Shipping's net margin of 13.74%. Performance Shipping's return on equity of 17.18% beat Star Bulk Carriers's return on equity of 14.09%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    PSHG
    Performance Shipping
    52.41% $0.25 $322.7M
    SBLK
    Star Bulk Carriers
    23.99% $0.36 $3.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About PSHG or SBLK?

    Performance Shipping has a consensus price target of $5.75, signalling upside risk potential of 261.77%. On the other hand Star Bulk Carriers has an analysts' consensus of $19.70 which suggests that it could grow by 26.93%. Given that Performance Shipping has higher upside potential than Star Bulk Carriers, analysts believe Performance Shipping is more attractive than Star Bulk Carriers.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    PSHG
    Performance Shipping
    1 0 0
    SBLK
    Star Bulk Carriers
    3 1 0
  • Is PSHG or SBLK More Risky?

    Performance Shipping has a beta of -0.237, which suggesting that the stock is 123.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Star Bulk Carriers has a beta of 0.906, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.393%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock PSHG or SBLK?

    Performance Shipping has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Star Bulk Carriers offers a yield of 13.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Performance Shipping pays 4.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Star Bulk Carriers pays out 90.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios PSHG or SBLK?

    Performance Shipping quarterly revenues are $21.7M, which are smaller than Star Bulk Carriers quarterly revenues of $308.9M. Performance Shipping's net income of $9.7M is lower than Star Bulk Carriers's net income of $42.4M. Notably, Performance Shipping's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.42x while Star Bulk Carriers's PE ratio is 5.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Shipping is 0.71x versus 1.33x for Star Bulk Carriers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    PSHG
    Performance Shipping
    0.71x 1.42x $21.7M $9.7M
    SBLK
    Star Bulk Carriers
    1.33x 5.85x $308.9M $42.4M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Spotify a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
Is Spotify a Millionaire-Maker Stock?

Spotify (NYSE:SPOT) may seem like an expensive proposition trading closer…

What Is a Millionaire-Maker Stock?
What Is a Millionaire-Maker Stock?

From time to time, investors will run across the term…

5 Investors to Follow Other Than Warren Buffett
5 Investors to Follow Other Than Warren Buffett

There is no doubt that Warren Buffett is one of…

Stock Ideas

Buy
68
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
60
RGC alert for May 10

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 79.25% over the past day.

Buy
97
NGVC alert for May 10

Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage [NGVC] is up 30.26% over the past day.

Sell
38
ONTO alert for May 10

Onto Innovation [ONTO] is down 30.17% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock