PRTH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has a net margin of 11.43% compared to Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 19.57%. Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.63% beat Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s return on equity of 71.7%.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.20, signalling upside risk potential of 84.45%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $289.54 which suggests that it could grow by 11.86%. Given that Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, Inc., analysts believe Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing, Inc..

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.451, which suggesting that the stock is 45.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing, Inc. has a beta of 0.857, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.307%.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing, Inc. offers a yield of 2.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. pays -98.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing, Inc. pays out 60.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $241.4M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing, Inc. quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $27.6M is lower than Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s net income of $1B. Notably, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.40x while Automatic Data Processing, Inc.'s PE ratio is 25.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is 0.47x versus 5.05x for Automatic Data Processing, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk, Inc. has a net margin of 11.43% compared to Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 18.5%. Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.63% beat Autodesk, Inc.'s return on equity of 41.26%.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.20, signalling upside risk potential of 84.45%. On the other hand Autodesk, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $366.13 which suggests that it could grow by 21.76%. Given that Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Autodesk, Inc., analysts believe Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Autodesk, Inc..

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.451, which suggesting that the stock is 45.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk, Inc. has a beta of 1.471, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.111%.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. pays -98.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $241.4M, which are smaller than Autodesk, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $27.6M is lower than Autodesk, Inc.'s net income of $343M. Notably, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.40x while Autodesk, Inc.'s PE ratio is 58.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is 0.47x versus 9.44x for Autodesk, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Agilysys, Inc. has a net margin of 11.43% compared to Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 14.77%. Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.63% beat Agilysys, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.94%.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.20, signalling upside risk potential of 84.45%. On the other hand Agilysys, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $142.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.89%. Given that Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Agilysys, Inc., analysts believe Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Agilysys, Inc..

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.451, which suggesting that the stock is 45.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Agilysys, Inc. has a beta of 0.419, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.053%.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Agilysys, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. pays -98.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Agilysys, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $241.4M, which are larger than Agilysys, Inc. quarterly revenues of $79.3M. Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $27.6M is higher than Agilysys, Inc.'s net income of $11.7M. Notably, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.40x while Agilysys, Inc.'s PE ratio is 141.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is 0.47x versus 11.48x for Agilysys, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo, Inc. has a net margin of 11.43% compared to Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of -7.71%. Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 36.63% beat Inuvo, Inc.'s return on equity of -35.27%.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.20, signalling upside risk potential of 84.45%. On the other hand Inuvo, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.88 which suggests that it could grow by 316.67%. Given that Inuvo, Inc. has higher upside potential than Priority Technology Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Inuvo, Inc. is more attractive than Priority Technology Holdings, Inc..

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.451, which suggesting that the stock is 45.148% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo, Inc. has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.66%.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. pays -98.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $241.4M, which are larger than Inuvo, Inc. quarterly revenues of $22.6M. Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $27.6M is higher than Inuvo, Inc.'s net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 10.40x while Inuvo, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. is 0.47x versus 2.08x for Inuvo, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.