PECO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a net margin of 14.79% compared to Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s net margin of -15.58%. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 3.48% beat Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.13%.

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $39.33, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.92 which suggests that it could grow by 20.98%. Given that Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc., analysts believe Healthpeak Properties, Inc. is more attractive than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc..

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthpeak Properties, Inc. has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.464%.

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Healthpeak Properties, Inc. offers a yield of 6.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. pays 233.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Healthpeak Properties, Inc. pays out 334.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $184.1M, which are smaller than Healthpeak Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues of $705.9M. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s net income of $27.2M is higher than Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s net income of -$110M. Notably, Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 57.15x while Healthpeak Properties, Inc.'s PE ratio is 79.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. is 6.74x versus 4.30x for Healthpeak Properties, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. has a net margin of 14.79% compared to Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s net margin of 62.44%. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 3.48% beat Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.8%.

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $39.33, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $53.63 which suggests that it could grow by 22.67%. Given that Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc., analysts believe Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. is more attractive than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc..

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.82%.

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. offers a yield of 7.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. pays 233.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. pays out 106.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $184.1M, which are smaller than Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues of $397.6M. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s net income of $27.2M is lower than Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s net income of $248.3M. Notably, Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 57.15x while Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. is 6.74x versus 7.71x for Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Opendoor Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 14.79% compared to Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s net margin of -9.84%. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 3.48% beat Opendoor Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -44.02%.

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $39.33, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand Opendoor Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $2.99 which suggests that it could fall by -56.98%. Given that Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has higher upside potential than Opendoor Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. is more attractive than Opendoor Technologies, Inc..

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Opendoor Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 3.581, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 258.121%.

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. Opendoor Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. pays 233.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Opendoor Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $184.1M, which are smaller than Opendoor Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $915M. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s net income of $27.2M is higher than Opendoor Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$90M. Notably, Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 57.15x while Opendoor Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. is 6.74x versus 1.07x for Opendoor Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VICI Properties, Inc. has a net margin of 14.79% compared to Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s net margin of 76.79%. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s return on equity of 3.48% beat VICI Properties, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.4%.

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a consensus price target of $39.33, signalling upside risk potential of 12.8%. On the other hand VICI Properties, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $35.73 which suggests that it could grow by 26.25%. Given that VICI Properties, Inc. has higher upside potential than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc., analysts believe VICI Properties, Inc. is more attractive than Phillips Edison & Co., Inc..

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VICI Properties, Inc. has a beta of 0.701, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.886%.

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.58%. VICI Properties, Inc. offers a yield of 6.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. pays 233.61% of its earnings as a dividend. VICI Properties, Inc. pays out 66.29% of its earnings as a dividend. VICI Properties, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s is not.

Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. quarterly revenues are $184.1M, which are smaller than VICI Properties, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1B. Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s net income of $27.2M is lower than VICI Properties, Inc.'s net income of $773.6M. Notably, Phillips Edison & Co., Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 57.15x while VICI Properties, Inc.'s PE ratio is 10.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Phillips Edison & Co., Inc. is 6.74x versus 7.55x for VICI Properties, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.