PDD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alibaba Group Holding has a net margin of 24.81% compared to PDD Holdings's net margin of 17.54%. PDD Holdings's return on equity of 44.83% beat Alibaba Group Holding's return on equity of 11.03%.

PDD Holdings has a consensus price target of $151.34, signalling upside risk potential of 21.7%. On the other hand Alibaba Group Holding has an analysts' consensus of $162.64 which suggests that it could grow by 19.92%. Given that PDD Holdings has higher upside potential than Alibaba Group Holding, analysts believe PDD Holdings is more attractive than Alibaba Group Holding.

PDD Holdings has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alibaba Group Holding has a beta of 0.276, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.369%.

PDD Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alibaba Group Holding offers a yield of 1.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.66 per share. PDD Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding pays out 22.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Alibaba Group Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PDD Holdings quarterly revenues are $15.4B, which are smaller than Alibaba Group Holding quarterly revenues of $38.9B. PDD Holdings's net income of $3.8B is lower than Alibaba Group Holding's net income of $6.8B. Notably, PDD Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.74x while Alibaba Group Holding's PE ratio is 19.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PDD Holdings is 3.35x versus 2.42x for Alibaba Group Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Carbon Revolution PLC has a net margin of 24.81% compared to PDD Holdings's net margin of --. PDD Holdings's return on equity of 44.83% beat Carbon Revolution PLC's return on equity of --.

PDD Holdings has a consensus price target of $151.34, signalling upside risk potential of 21.7%. On the other hand Carbon Revolution PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1175.75%. Given that Carbon Revolution PLC has higher upside potential than PDD Holdings, analysts believe Carbon Revolution PLC is more attractive than PDD Holdings.

PDD Holdings has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carbon Revolution PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PDD Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Carbon Revolution PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PDD Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carbon Revolution PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PDD Holdings quarterly revenues are $15.4B, which are larger than Carbon Revolution PLC quarterly revenues of --. PDD Holdings's net income of $3.8B is higher than Carbon Revolution PLC's net income of --. Notably, PDD Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.74x while Carbon Revolution PLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PDD Holdings is 3.35x versus -- for Carbon Revolution PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

JD.com has a net margin of 24.81% compared to PDD Holdings's net margin of 2.84%. PDD Holdings's return on equity of 44.83% beat JD.com's return on equity of 13.91%.

PDD Holdings has a consensus price target of $151.34, signalling upside risk potential of 21.7%. On the other hand JD.com has an analysts' consensus of $55.10 which suggests that it could grow by 28.46%. Given that JD.com has higher upside potential than PDD Holdings, analysts believe JD.com is more attractive than PDD Holdings.

PDD Holdings has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison JD.com has a beta of 0.428, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.199%.

PDD Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. JD.com offers a yield of 1.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. PDD Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. JD.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PDD Holdings quarterly revenues are $15.4B, which are smaller than JD.com quarterly revenues of $48.2B. PDD Holdings's net income of $3.8B is higher than JD.com's net income of $1.4B. Notably, PDD Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.74x while JD.com's PE ratio is 11.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PDD Holdings is 3.35x versus 0.41x for JD.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Smurfit WestRock PLC has a net margin of 24.81% compared to PDD Holdings's net margin of 1.94%. PDD Holdings's return on equity of 44.83% beat Smurfit WestRock PLC's return on equity of 2.59%.

PDD Holdings has a consensus price target of $151.34, signalling upside risk potential of 21.7%. On the other hand Smurfit WestRock PLC has an analysts' consensus of $60.15 which suggests that it could grow by 32.49%. Given that Smurfit WestRock PLC has higher upside potential than PDD Holdings, analysts believe Smurfit WestRock PLC is more attractive than PDD Holdings.

PDD Holdings has a beta of 0.692, which suggesting that the stock is 30.78% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Smurfit WestRock PLC has a beta of 0.982, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.757%.

PDD Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Smurfit WestRock PLC offers a yield of 5.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. PDD Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Smurfit WestRock PLC pays out 203.76% of its earnings as a dividend.

PDD Holdings quarterly revenues are $15.4B, which are larger than Smurfit WestRock PLC quarterly revenues of $7.5B. PDD Holdings's net income of $3.8B is higher than Smurfit WestRock PLC's net income of $146M. Notably, PDD Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.74x while Smurfit WestRock PLC's PE ratio is 44.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PDD Holdings is 3.35x versus 0.84x for Smurfit WestRock PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.