PCYO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadiz has a net margin of 68.45% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of -210.7%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 10.75% beat Cadiz's return on equity of -84.84%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -37.38%. On the other hand Cadiz has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 411.95%. Given that Cadiz has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe Cadiz is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.475% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadiz has a beta of 1.539, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.906%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cadiz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadiz pays out -16.4% of its earnings as a dividend.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are larger than Cadiz quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Pure Cycle's net income of $3.9M is higher than Cadiz's net income of -$6.8M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.85x while Cadiz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 8.67x versus 20.99x for Cadiz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Middlesex Water has a net margin of 68.45% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of 18.69%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 10.75% beat Middlesex Water's return on equity of 10.17%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -37.38%. On the other hand Middlesex Water has an analysts' consensus of $62.33 which suggests that it could fall by -2.7%. Given that Pure Cycle has more downside risk than Middlesex Water, analysts believe Middlesex Water is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.475% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Middlesex Water has a beta of 0.798, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.165%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Middlesex Water offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Middlesex Water pays out 53.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Middlesex Water's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are smaller than Middlesex Water quarterly revenues of $47.1M. Pure Cycle's net income of $3.9M is lower than Middlesex Water's net income of $8.8M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.85x while Middlesex Water's PE ratio is 25.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 8.67x versus 5.99x for Middlesex Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SJW Group has a net margin of 68.45% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of 11.59%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 10.75% beat SJW Group's return on equity of 7.29%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -37.38%. On the other hand SJW Group has an analysts' consensus of $59.20 which suggests that it could grow by 8.27%. Given that SJW Group has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe SJW Group is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.475% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SJW Group has a beta of 0.559, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.072%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SJW Group offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SJW Group pays out 55.48% of its earnings as a dividend. SJW Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are smaller than SJW Group quarterly revenues of $197.8M. Pure Cycle's net income of $3.9M is lower than SJW Group's net income of $22.9M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.85x while SJW Group's PE ratio is 19.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 8.67x versus 2.39x for SJW Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The York Water has a net margin of 68.45% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of 27.26%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 10.75% beat The York Water's return on equity of 9%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -37.38%. On the other hand The York Water has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.11%. Given that The York Water has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe The York Water is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.105, which suggesting that the stock is 10.475% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The York Water has a beta of 0.652, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.812%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The York Water offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The York Water pays out 59.47% of its earnings as a dividend. The York Water's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $5.8M, which are smaller than The York Water quarterly revenues of $18.9M. Pure Cycle's net income of $3.9M is lower than The York Water's net income of $5.1M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.85x while The York Water's PE ratio is 24.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 8.67x versus 6.64x for The York Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.