MSEX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadiz, Inc. has a net margin of 25.81% compared to Middlesex Water Co.'s net margin of -170.45%. Middlesex Water Co.'s return on equity of 9.42% beat Cadiz, Inc.'s return on equity of -101.92%.

Middlesex Water Co. has a consensus price target of $59.67, signalling upside risk potential of 16.67%. On the other hand Cadiz, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.50 which suggests that it could grow by 120.85%. Given that Cadiz, Inc. has higher upside potential than Middlesex Water Co., analysts believe Cadiz, Inc. is more attractive than Middlesex Water Co..

Middlesex Water Co. has a beta of 0.876, which suggesting that the stock is 12.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadiz, Inc. has a beta of 2.020, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.025%.

Middlesex Water Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Cadiz, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Middlesex Water Co. pays 53.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Cadiz, Inc. pays out 16.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Middlesex Water Co. quarterly revenues are $54.1M, which are larger than Cadiz, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Middlesex Water Co.'s net income of $14M is higher than Cadiz, Inc.'s net income of -$7.1M. Notably, Middlesex Water Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.47x while Cadiz, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Middlesex Water Co. is 4.73x versus 27.78x for Cadiz, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

California Water Service Group has a net margin of 25.81% compared to Middlesex Water Co.'s net margin of 19.64%. Middlesex Water Co.'s return on equity of 9.42% beat California Water Service Group's return on equity of 8.22%.

Middlesex Water Co. has a consensus price target of $59.67, signalling upside risk potential of 16.67%. On the other hand California Water Service Group has an analysts' consensus of $55.25 which suggests that it could grow by 19.07%. Given that California Water Service Group has higher upside potential than Middlesex Water Co., analysts believe California Water Service Group is more attractive than Middlesex Water Co..

Middlesex Water Co. has a beta of 0.876, which suggesting that the stock is 12.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California Water Service Group has a beta of 0.650, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.993%.

Middlesex Water Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. California Water Service Group offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Middlesex Water Co. pays 53.35% of its earnings as a dividend. California Water Service Group pays out 34.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Middlesex Water Co. quarterly revenues are $54.1M, which are smaller than California Water Service Group quarterly revenues of $311.2M. Middlesex Water Co.'s net income of $14M is lower than California Water Service Group's net income of $61.1M. Notably, Middlesex Water Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.47x while California Water Service Group's PE ratio is 19.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Middlesex Water Co. is 4.73x versus 2.65x for California Water Service Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Water Resources, Inc. has a net margin of 25.81% compared to Middlesex Water Co.'s net margin of 11.06%. Middlesex Water Co.'s return on equity of 9.42% beat Global Water Resources, Inc.'s return on equity of 6.42%.

Middlesex Water Co. has a consensus price target of $59.67, signalling upside risk potential of 16.67%. On the other hand Global Water Resources, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.53 which suggests that it could grow by 43.24%. Given that Global Water Resources, Inc. has higher upside potential than Middlesex Water Co., analysts believe Global Water Resources, Inc. is more attractive than Middlesex Water Co..

Middlesex Water Co. has a beta of 0.876, which suggesting that the stock is 12.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Water Resources, Inc. has a beta of 0.986, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.386%.

Middlesex Water Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Global Water Resources, Inc. offers a yield of 3.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Middlesex Water Co. pays 53.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Water Resources, Inc. pays out 126.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Middlesex Water Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Global Water Resources, Inc.'s is not.

Middlesex Water Co. quarterly revenues are $54.1M, which are larger than Global Water Resources, Inc. quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Middlesex Water Co.'s net income of $14M is higher than Global Water Resources, Inc.'s net income of $1.7M. Notably, Middlesex Water Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.47x while Global Water Resources, Inc.'s PE ratio is 53.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Middlesex Water Co. is 4.73x versus 4.09x for Global Water Resources, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pure Cycle Corp. has a net margin of 25.81% compared to Middlesex Water Co.'s net margin of 54.54%. Middlesex Water Co.'s return on equity of 9.42% beat Pure Cycle Corp.'s return on equity of 9.68%.

Middlesex Water Co. has a consensus price target of $59.67, signalling upside risk potential of 16.67%. On the other hand Pure Cycle Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -44.11%. Given that Middlesex Water Co. has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle Corp., analysts believe Middlesex Water Co. is more attractive than Pure Cycle Corp..

Middlesex Water Co. has a beta of 0.876, which suggesting that the stock is 12.389% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pure Cycle Corp. has a beta of 1.377, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.726%.

Middlesex Water Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Pure Cycle Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Middlesex Water Co. pays 53.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Pure Cycle Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Middlesex Water Co.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Middlesex Water Co. quarterly revenues are $54.1M, which are larger than Pure Cycle Corp. quarterly revenues of $11.2M. Middlesex Water Co.'s net income of $14M is higher than Pure Cycle Corp.'s net income of $6.1M. Notably, Middlesex Water Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 21.47x while Pure Cycle Corp.'s PE ratio is 21.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Middlesex Water Co. is 4.73x versus 10.85x for Pure Cycle Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.