PCT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

LanzaTech Global has a net margin of -- compared to PureCycle Technologies's net margin of -577.6%. PureCycle Technologies's return on equity of -- beat LanzaTech Global's return on equity of -155.58%.

PureCycle Technologies has a consensus price target of $12.50, signalling upside risk potential of 98.41%. On the other hand LanzaTech Global has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1078.55%. Given that LanzaTech Global has higher upside potential than PureCycle Technologies, analysts believe LanzaTech Global is more attractive than PureCycle Technologies.

PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LanzaTech Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PureCycle Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LanzaTech Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PureCycle Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LanzaTech Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PureCycle Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LanzaTech Global quarterly revenues of $9.9M. PureCycle Technologies's net income of -$64.7M is lower than LanzaTech Global's net income of -$57.4M. Notably, PureCycle Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LanzaTech Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PureCycle Technologies is -- versus 0.68x for LanzaTech Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a net margin of -- compared to PureCycle Technologies's net margin of -23.73%. PureCycle Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Perma-Fix Environmental Services's return on equity of -43.18%.

PureCycle Technologies has a consensus price target of $12.50, signalling upside risk potential of 98.41%. On the other hand Perma-Fix Environmental Services has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 116.22%. Given that Perma-Fix Environmental Services has higher upside potential than PureCycle Technologies, analysts believe Perma-Fix Environmental Services is more attractive than PureCycle Technologies.

PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perma-Fix Environmental Services has a beta of 0.280, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.007%.

PureCycle Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PureCycle Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perma-Fix Environmental Services pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

PureCycle Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Perma-Fix Environmental Services quarterly revenues of $14.7M. PureCycle Technologies's net income of -$64.7M is lower than Perma-Fix Environmental Services's net income of -$3.5M. Notably, PureCycle Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perma-Fix Environmental Services's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PureCycle Technologies is -- versus 2.12x for Perma-Fix Environmental Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Republic Services has a net margin of -- compared to PureCycle Technologies's net margin of 12.66%. PureCycle Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Republic Services's return on equity of 18.57%.

PureCycle Technologies has a consensus price target of $12.50, signalling upside risk potential of 98.41%. On the other hand Republic Services has an analysts' consensus of $245.76 which suggests that it could grow by 1.82%. Given that PureCycle Technologies has higher upside potential than Republic Services, analysts believe PureCycle Technologies is more attractive than Republic Services.

PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Republic Services has a beta of 0.617, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.348%.

PureCycle Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Republic Services offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. PureCycle Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Services pays out 33.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Services's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PureCycle Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Republic Services quarterly revenues of $4B. PureCycle Technologies's net income of -$64.7M is lower than Republic Services's net income of $512M. Notably, PureCycle Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Republic Services's PE ratio is 37.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PureCycle Technologies is -- versus 4.74x for Republic Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a net margin of -- compared to PureCycle Technologies's net margin of 11.21%. PureCycle Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's return on equity of 10.69%.

PureCycle Technologies has a consensus price target of $12.50, signalling upside risk potential of 98.41%. On the other hand Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $35.43 which suggests that it could grow by 7.2%. Given that PureCycle Technologies has higher upside potential than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions, analysts believe PureCycle Technologies is more attractive than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions.

PureCycle Technologies has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zurn Elkay Water Solutions has a beta of 1.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.055%.

PureCycle Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. PureCycle Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions pays out 35.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PureCycle Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions quarterly revenues of $388.8M. PureCycle Technologies's net income of -$64.7M is lower than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's net income of $43.6M. Notably, PureCycle Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zurn Elkay Water Solutions's PE ratio is 32.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PureCycle Technologies is -- versus 3.58x for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.