ABAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gold Resource has a net margin of -5790.54% compared to American Battery Technology's net margin of -79.08%. American Battery Technology's return on equity of -- beat Gold Resource's return on equity of -54.81%.

American Battery Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 246.15%. On the other hand Gold Resource has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 588.39%. Given that Gold Resource has higher upside potential than American Battery Technology, analysts believe Gold Resource is more attractive than American Battery Technology.

American Battery Technology has a beta of 1.834, which suggesting that the stock is 83.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Resource has a beta of 1.605, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.465%.

American Battery Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Resource offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Battery Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Resource pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Battery Technology quarterly revenues are $202K, which are smaller than Gold Resource quarterly revenues of $13.3M. American Battery Technology's net income of -$11.7M is lower than Gold Resource's net income of -$10.5M. Notably, American Battery Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Resource's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Battery Technology is -- versus 0.27x for Gold Resource. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ivanhoe Electric has a net margin of -5790.54% compared to American Battery Technology's net margin of -6443.52%. American Battery Technology's return on equity of -- beat Ivanhoe Electric's return on equity of -57.41%.

American Battery Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 246.15%. On the other hand Ivanhoe Electric has an analysts' consensus of $16.80 which suggests that it could grow by 117.95%. Given that American Battery Technology has higher upside potential than Ivanhoe Electric, analysts believe American Battery Technology is more attractive than Ivanhoe Electric.

American Battery Technology has a beta of 1.834, which suggesting that the stock is 83.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ivanhoe Electric has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

American Battery Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ivanhoe Electric offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Battery Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ivanhoe Electric pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Battery Technology quarterly revenues are $202K, which are smaller than Ivanhoe Electric quarterly revenues of $671K. American Battery Technology's net income of -$11.7M is higher than Ivanhoe Electric's net income of -$43.2M. Notably, American Battery Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ivanhoe Electric's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Battery Technology is -- versus 288.81x for Ivanhoe Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rare Element Resources has a net margin of -5790.54% compared to American Battery Technology's net margin of --. American Battery Technology's return on equity of -- beat Rare Element Resources's return on equity of --.

American Battery Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 246.15%. On the other hand Rare Element Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 739.97%. Given that Rare Element Resources has higher upside potential than American Battery Technology, analysts believe Rare Element Resources is more attractive than American Battery Technology.

American Battery Technology has a beta of 1.834, which suggesting that the stock is 83.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rare Element Resources has a beta of 1.554, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.41%.

American Battery Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rare Element Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Battery Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rare Element Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Battery Technology quarterly revenues are $202K, which are larger than Rare Element Resources quarterly revenues of --. American Battery Technology's net income of -$11.7M is higher than Rare Element Resources's net income of --. Notably, American Battery Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rare Element Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Battery Technology is -- versus -- for Rare Element Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vista Gold has a net margin of -5790.54% compared to American Battery Technology's net margin of --. American Battery Technology's return on equity of -- beat Vista Gold's return on equity of --.

American Battery Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 246.15%. On the other hand Vista Gold has an analysts' consensus of $1.88 which suggests that it could grow by 390.98%. Given that Vista Gold has higher upside potential than American Battery Technology, analysts believe Vista Gold is more attractive than American Battery Technology.

American Battery Technology has a beta of 1.834, which suggesting that the stock is 83.437% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vista Gold has a beta of 1.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.304%.

American Battery Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vista Gold offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Battery Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vista Gold pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Battery Technology quarterly revenues are $202K, which are larger than Vista Gold quarterly revenues of --. American Battery Technology's net income of -$11.7M is lower than Vista Gold's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, American Battery Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vista Gold's PE ratio is 6.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Battery Technology is -- versus 159.82x for Vista Gold. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.