Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Sell
33
ABAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$3.34
Seasonality move
:
-1.33%
Day range:
$3.21 - $3.39
52-week range:
$0.86 - $11.49
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
61.48x
P/B ratio:
4.52x
Volume:
4.8M
Avg. volume:
5.9M
1-year change:
35.77%
Market cap:
$434.1M
Revenue:
$4.3M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.51
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ABAT
American Battery Technology Co.
|
$2M | -- | 504.99% | -- | $6.00 |
|
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
|
$471.3M | $0.22 | 10.26% | 188.46% | $112.70 |
|
LNZA
LanzaTech Global, Inc.
|
$12.2M | -$6.47 | 1.41% | -53.28% | $14.00 |
|
PCT
Purecycle Technologies, Inc.
|
$6.4M | -$0.25 | 356.12% | -32.37% | $15.17 |
|
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
|
$17.7M | -$0.09 | 20.39% | -58.22% | $20.00 |
|
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.
|
$4.2B | $1.62 | 4.16% | -0.5% | $245.17 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ABAT
American Battery Technology Co.
|
$3.34 | $6.00 | $434.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 61.48x |
|
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
|
$97.94 | $112.70 | $6.2B | 408.42x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.46x |
|
LNZA
LanzaTech Global, Inc.
|
$13.76 | $14.00 | $31.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.76x |
|
PCT
Purecycle Technologies, Inc.
|
$8.59 | $15.17 | $1.5B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 268.87x |
|
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
|
$12.59 | $20.00 | $233.1M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.71x |
|
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.
|
$211.93 | $245.17 | $65.6B | 31.50x | $0.63 | 1.12% | 4.02x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ABAT
American Battery Technology Co.
|
0.29% | 1.568 | 0.05% | 6.04x |
|
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
|
44.04% | -0.553 | 20.47% | 1.32x |
|
LNZA
LanzaTech Global, Inc.
|
78.55% | 5.736 | 42.84% | 1.67x |
|
PCT
Purecycle Technologies, Inc.
|
91.47% | 5.112 | 30.87% | 2.02x |
|
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
|
6.93% | 2.219 | 2.21% | 1.55x |
|
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.
|
53.22% | -0.530 | 19.22% | 0.48x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ABAT
American Battery Technology Co.
|
-$3.8M | -$10.1M | -58.07% | -62.64% | -1080.78% | -$7.8M |
|
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
|
$91.3M | $34M | 0.55% | 0.98% | 7% | $27.6M |
|
LNZA
LanzaTech Global, Inc.
|
$1.3M | -$15.7M | -116.55% | -1719.87% | -168.74% | -$16M |
|
PCT
Purecycle Technologies, Inc.
|
-$27.9M | -$38.9M | -32.91% | -138.1% | -1602.18% | -$42.4M |
|
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
|
$2.5M | -$1.9M | -18.98% | -20.58% | -10.7% | -$5.8M |
|
RSG
Republic Services, Inc.
|
$1.3B | $839M | 8.48% | 18.1% | 19.92% | $737M |
American Battery Technology Co. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ABAT or CWST?
Casella Waste Systems, Inc. has a net margin of -1098.51% compared to American Battery Technology Co.'s net margin of 2.06%. American Battery Technology Co.'s return on equity of -62.64% beat Casella Waste Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.98%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ABATAmerican Battery Technology Co.-406.1% -$0.09 $96.3M CWSTCasella Waste Systems, Inc.18.8% $0.16 $2.8B -
What do Analysts Say About ABAT or CWST?
American Battery Technology Co. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 79.64%. On the other hand Casella Waste Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $112.70 which suggests that it could grow by 15.07%. Given that American Battery Technology Co. has higher upside potential than Casella Waste Systems, Inc., analysts believe American Battery Technology Co. is more attractive than Casella Waste Systems, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ABATAmerican Battery Technology Co.1 0 0 CWSTCasella Waste Systems, Inc.6 4 0 -
Is ABAT or CWST More Risky?
American Battery Technology Co. has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Casella Waste Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.801, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.921%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ABAT or CWST?
American Battery Technology Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Casella Waste Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Battery Technology Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Casella Waste Systems, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ABAT or CWST?
American Battery Technology Co. quarterly revenues are $937.6K, which are smaller than Casella Waste Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $485.4M. American Battery Technology Co.'s net income of -$10.3M is lower than Casella Waste Systems, Inc.'s net income of $10M. Notably, American Battery Technology Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Casella Waste Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 408.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Battery Technology Co. is 61.48x versus 3.46x for Casella Waste Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ABATAmerican Battery Technology Co.61.48x -- $937.6K -$10.3M CWSTCasella Waste Systems, Inc.3.46x 408.42x $485.4M $10M
-
Which has Higher Returns ABAT or LNZA?
LanzaTech Global, Inc. has a net margin of -1098.51% compared to American Battery Technology Co.'s net margin of 30.83%. American Battery Technology Co.'s return on equity of -62.64% beat LanzaTech Global, Inc.'s return on equity of -1719.87%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ABATAmerican Battery Technology Co.-406.1% -$0.09 $96.3M LNZALanzaTech Global, Inc.14.42% $0.99 $38.2M -
What do Analysts Say About ABAT or LNZA?
American Battery Technology Co. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 79.64%. On the other hand LanzaTech Global, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1.74%. Given that American Battery Technology Co. has higher upside potential than LanzaTech Global, Inc., analysts believe American Battery Technology Co. is more attractive than LanzaTech Global, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ABATAmerican Battery Technology Co.1 0 0 LNZALanzaTech Global, Inc.0 1 0 -
Is ABAT or LNZA More Risky?
American Battery Technology Co. has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LanzaTech Global, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ABAT or LNZA?
American Battery Technology Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LanzaTech Global, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Battery Technology Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LanzaTech Global, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ABAT or LNZA?
American Battery Technology Co. quarterly revenues are $937.6K, which are smaller than LanzaTech Global, Inc. quarterly revenues of $9.3M. American Battery Technology Co.'s net income of -$10.3M is lower than LanzaTech Global, Inc.'s net income of $2.9M. Notably, American Battery Technology Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LanzaTech Global, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Battery Technology Co. is 61.48x versus 0.76x for LanzaTech Global, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ABATAmerican Battery Technology Co.61.48x -- $937.6K -$10.3M LNZALanzaTech Global, Inc.0.76x -- $9.3M $2.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns ABAT or PCT?
Purecycle Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -1098.51% compared to American Battery Technology Co.'s net margin of -1167.49%. American Battery Technology Co.'s return on equity of -62.64% beat Purecycle Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -138.1%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ABATAmerican Battery Technology Co.-406.1% -$0.09 $96.3M PCTPurecycle Technologies, Inc.-1150% -$0.31 $799.7M -
What do Analysts Say About ABAT or PCT?
American Battery Technology Co. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 79.64%. On the other hand Purecycle Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $15.17 which suggests that it could grow by 76.56%. Given that American Battery Technology Co. has higher upside potential than Purecycle Technologies, Inc., analysts believe American Battery Technology Co. is more attractive than Purecycle Technologies, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ABATAmerican Battery Technology Co.1 0 0 PCTPurecycle Technologies, Inc.3 3 0 -
Is ABAT or PCT More Risky?
American Battery Technology Co. has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purecycle Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 2.028, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.778%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ABAT or PCT?
American Battery Technology Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Purecycle Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Battery Technology Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purecycle Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ABAT or PCT?
American Battery Technology Co. quarterly revenues are $937.6K, which are smaller than Purecycle Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4M. American Battery Technology Co.'s net income of -$10.3M is higher than Purecycle Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$28.4M. Notably, American Battery Technology Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purecycle Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Battery Technology Co. is 61.48x versus 268.87x for Purecycle Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ABATAmerican Battery Technology Co.61.48x -- $937.6K -$10.3M PCTPurecycle Technologies, Inc.268.87x -- $2.4M -$28.4M
-
Which has Higher Returns ABAT or PESI?
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. has a net margin of -1098.51% compared to American Battery Technology Co.'s net margin of -10.1%. American Battery Technology Co.'s return on equity of -62.64% beat Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.58%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ABATAmerican Battery Technology Co.-406.1% -$0.09 $96.3M PESIPerma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.14.58% -$0.10 $59.5M -
What do Analysts Say About ABAT or PESI?
American Battery Technology Co. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 79.64%. On the other hand Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 58.86%. Given that American Battery Technology Co. has higher upside potential than Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc., analysts believe American Battery Technology Co. is more attractive than Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ABATAmerican Battery Technology Co.1 0 0 PESIPerma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is ABAT or PESI More Risky?
American Battery Technology Co. has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.385, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.516%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ABAT or PESI?
American Battery Technology Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Battery Technology Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ABAT or PESI?
American Battery Technology Co. quarterly revenues are $937.6K, which are smaller than Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $17.5M. American Battery Technology Co.'s net income of -$10.3M is lower than Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, American Battery Technology Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Battery Technology Co. is 61.48x versus 3.71x for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ABATAmerican Battery Technology Co.61.48x -- $937.6K -$10.3M PESIPerma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.3.71x -- $17.5M -$1.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns ABAT or RSG?
Republic Services, Inc. has a net margin of -1098.51% compared to American Battery Technology Co.'s net margin of 13.06%. American Battery Technology Co.'s return on equity of -62.64% beat Republic Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.1%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ABATAmerican Battery Technology Co.-406.1% -$0.09 $96.3M RSGRepublic Services, Inc.29.94% $1.76 $25.4B -
What do Analysts Say About ABAT or RSG?
American Battery Technology Co. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 79.64%. On the other hand Republic Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $245.17 which suggests that it could grow by 15.69%. Given that American Battery Technology Co. has higher upside potential than Republic Services, Inc., analysts believe American Battery Technology Co. is more attractive than Republic Services, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ABATAmerican Battery Technology Co.1 0 0 RSGRepublic Services, Inc.13 9 0 -
Is ABAT or RSG More Risky?
American Battery Technology Co. has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.466% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Republic Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.555, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.531%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ABAT or RSG?
American Battery Technology Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Republic Services, Inc. offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. American Battery Technology Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Services, Inc. pays out 34.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ABAT or RSG?
American Battery Technology Co. quarterly revenues are $937.6K, which are smaller than Republic Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.2B. American Battery Technology Co.'s net income of -$10.3M is lower than Republic Services, Inc.'s net income of $550M. Notably, American Battery Technology Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Republic Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 31.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Battery Technology Co. is 61.48x versus 4.02x for Republic Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ABATAmerican Battery Technology Co.61.48x -- $937.6K -$10.3M RSGRepublic Services, Inc.4.02x 31.50x $4.2B $550M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is CoreWeave Stock Down So Much?
AI cloud computing business CoreWeave (NASDAQ:CRWV) has been through a…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Buy MercadoLibre Stock?
In Q3, billionaire Stan Druckenmiller bought about 4,620 shares of…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
61
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Alerts
Sell
30
CORT alert for Jan 1
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc. [CORT] is down 50.44% over the past day.
Buy
75
AXSM alert for Jan 1
Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. [AXSM] is up 22.82% over the past day.
Buy
81
ZIJMY alert for Jan 1
Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd. [ZIJMY] is up 1.86% over the past day.
