ABAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Purecycle Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -194.99% compared to American Battery Technology Co.'s net margin of -1167.49%. American Battery Technology Co.'s return on equity of -48.9% beat Purecycle Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of -138.1%.

American Battery Technology Co. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.6%. On the other hand Purecycle Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 119.23%. Given that Purecycle Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than American Battery Technology Co., analysts believe Purecycle Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than American Battery Technology Co..

American Battery Technology Co. has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.677% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Purecycle Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 2.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.527%.

American Battery Technology Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Purecycle Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Battery Technology Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Purecycle Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Battery Technology Co. quarterly revenues are $4.8M, which are larger than Purecycle Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.4M. American Battery Technology Co.'s net income of -$9.3M is higher than Purecycle Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -$28.4M. Notably, American Battery Technology Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Purecycle Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Battery Technology Co. is 41.38x versus 136.51x for Purecycle Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. has a net margin of -194.99% compared to American Battery Technology Co.'s net margin of -10.1%. American Battery Technology Co.'s return on equity of -48.9% beat Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.58%.

American Battery Technology Co. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.6%. On the other hand Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $20.00 which suggests that it could grow by 46.63%. Given that American Battery Technology Co. has higher upside potential than Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc., analysts believe American Battery Technology Co. is more attractive than Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc..

American Battery Technology Co. has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.677% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.393, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.667%.

American Battery Technology Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. American Battery Technology Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

American Battery Technology Co. quarterly revenues are $4.8M, which are smaller than Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $17.5M. American Battery Technology Co.'s net income of -$9.3M is lower than Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, American Battery Technology Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Battery Technology Co. is 41.38x versus 4.02x for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Republic Services, Inc. has a net margin of -194.99% compared to American Battery Technology Co.'s net margin of 13.18%. American Battery Technology Co.'s return on equity of -48.9% beat Republic Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 18.15%.

American Battery Technology Co. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.6%. On the other hand Republic Services, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $244.04 which suggests that it could grow by 6.57%. Given that American Battery Technology Co. has higher upside potential than Republic Services, Inc., analysts believe American Battery Technology Co. is more attractive than Republic Services, Inc..

American Battery Technology Co. has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.677% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Republic Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.542, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.819%.

American Battery Technology Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Republic Services, Inc. offers a yield of 1.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. American Battery Technology Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Services, Inc. pays out 35.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Republic Services, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

American Battery Technology Co. quarterly revenues are $4.8M, which are smaller than Republic Services, Inc. quarterly revenues of $4.1B. American Battery Technology Co.'s net income of -$9.3M is lower than Republic Services, Inc.'s net income of $545M. Notably, American Battery Technology Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Republic Services, Inc.'s PE ratio is 33.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Battery Technology Co. is 41.38x versus 4.31x for Republic Services, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp. has a net margin of -194.99% compared to American Battery Technology Co.'s net margin of 10.24%. American Battery Technology Co.'s return on equity of -48.9% beat Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.'s return on equity of 12.19%.

American Battery Technology Co. has a consensus price target of $6.00, signalling upside risk potential of 62.6%. On the other hand Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $55.33 which suggests that it could grow by 8.54%. Given that American Battery Technology Co. has higher upside potential than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp., analysts believe American Battery Technology Co. is more attractive than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp..

American Battery Technology Co. has a beta of 0.743, which suggesting that the stock is 25.677% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp. has a beta of 1.133, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.299%.

American Battery Technology Co. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp. offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. American Battery Technology Co. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp. pays out 32.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

American Battery Technology Co. quarterly revenues are $4.8M, which are smaller than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp. quarterly revenues of $407.2M. American Battery Technology Co.'s net income of -$9.3M is lower than Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.'s net income of $41.7M. Notably, American Battery Technology Co.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.'s PE ratio is 43.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for American Battery Technology Co. is 41.38x versus 5.13x for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.