PANW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ePlus, Inc. has a net margin of 13.5% compared to Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s net margin of 6.27%. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.51% beat ePlus, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.57%.

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a consensus price target of $224.53, signalling upside risk potential of 15.96%. On the other hand ePlus, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $92.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.87%. Given that Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has higher upside potential than ePlus, Inc., analysts believe Palo Alto Networks, Inc. is more attractive than ePlus, Inc..

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a beta of 0.788, which suggesting that the stock is 21.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus, Inc. has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.259%.

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus, Inc. offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than ePlus, Inc. quarterly revenues of $608.8M. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s net income of $334M is higher than ePlus, Inc.'s net income of $38.2M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 122.81x while ePlus, Inc.'s PE ratio is 19.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. is 14.36x versus 1.04x for ePlus, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet, Inc. has a net margin of 13.5% compared to Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s net margin of 18.25%. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.51% beat Red Violet, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.97%.

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a consensus price target of $224.53, signalling upside risk potential of 15.96%. On the other hand Red Violet, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $67.50 which suggests that it could grow by 23.47%. Given that Red Violet, Inc. has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, Inc., analysts believe Red Violet, Inc. is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks, Inc..

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a beta of 0.788, which suggesting that the stock is 21.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet, Inc. has a beta of 1.672, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.245%.

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Red Violet, Inc. quarterly revenues of $23.1M. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s net income of $334M is higher than Red Violet, Inc.'s net income of $4.2M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 122.81x while Red Violet, Inc.'s PE ratio is 72.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. is 14.36x versus 9.31x for Red Violet, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenable Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 13.5% compared to Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s net margin of 0.9%. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.51% beat Tenable Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.9%.

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a consensus price target of $224.53, signalling upside risk potential of 15.96%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $37.89 which suggests that it could grow by 41.35%. Given that Tenable Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, Inc., analysts believe Tenable Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks, Inc..

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a beta of 0.788, which suggesting that the stock is 21.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.727, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.336%.

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tenable Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Tenable Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $252.4M. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s net income of $334M is higher than Tenable Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $2.3M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 122.81x while Tenable Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. is 14.36x versus 3.35x for Tenable Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software, Inc. has a net margin of 13.5% compared to Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s net margin of -2.22%. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.51% beat Upland Software, Inc.'s return on equity of -41.93%.

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a consensus price target of $224.53, signalling upside risk potential of 15.96%. On the other hand Upland Software, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.33 which suggests that it could grow by 143.45%. Given that Upland Software, Inc. has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, Inc., analysts believe Upland Software, Inc. is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks, Inc..

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a beta of 0.788, which suggesting that the stock is 21.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software, Inc. has a beta of 1.190, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.969%.

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Upland Software, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.5M. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s net income of $334M is higher than Upland Software, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 122.81x while Upland Software, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. is 14.36x versus 0.21x for Upland Software, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.