Is Bloom Energy The Best Stock to Buy Now?
Shares of energy startup Bloom Energy (NYSE:BE) have advanced by…
Sell
44
PANW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$186.80
Seasonality move
:
6.68%
Day range:
$186.14 - $188.27
52-week range:
$144.15 - $223.61
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
118.53x
P/S ratio:
13.86x
P/B ratio:
15.03x
Volume:
19.1M
Avg. volume:
6.6M
1-year change:
-1.31%
Market cap:
$130.3B
Revenue:
$9.2B
EPS (TTM):
$1.58
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
|
$2.6B | $0.94 | 14.39% | 148.78% | $225.42 |
|
ATEN
A10 Networks, Inc.
|
$70.8M | $0.21 | 5.23% | -2.62% | $23.17 |
|
NOW
ServiceNow, Inc.
|
$3.7B | $0.95 | 19.31% | 141.03% | $227.08 |
|
PLUS
ePlus, Inc.
|
$516.4M | $1.02 | 5.4% | 1.48% | $92.00 |
|
TENB
Tenable Holdings, Inc.
|
$256.9M | $0.40 | 6.81% | 2644.7% | $37.68 |
|
UPLD
Upland Software, Inc.
|
$50.7M | $0.16 | -26.06% | -- | $4.33 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
|
$186.88 | $225.42 | $130.3B | 118.53x | $0.00 | 0% | 13.86x |
|
ATEN
A10 Networks, Inc.
|
$17.96 | $23.17 | $1.3B | 26.32x | $0.06 | 1.34% | 4.68x |
|
NOW
ServiceNow, Inc.
|
$155.31 | $227.08 | $161.3B | 45.52x | $0.00 | 0% | 7.70x |
|
PLUS
ePlus, Inc.
|
$89.53 | $92.00 | $2.4B | 20.15x | $0.25 | 0.56% | 1.06x |
|
TENB
Tenable Holdings, Inc.
|
$24.79 | $37.68 | $3B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.10x |
|
UPLD
Upland Software, Inc.
|
$1.46 | $4.33 | $42.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.18x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
|
3.84% | 1.141 | 0.23% | 0.75x |
|
ATEN
A10 Networks, Inc.
|
52.6% | 1.489 | 17.59% | 3.36x |
|
NOW
ServiceNow, Inc.
|
17.53% | 0.898 | 1.25% | 0.89x |
|
PLUS
ePlus, Inc.
|
-- | 1.445 | -- | 1.72x |
|
TENB
Tenable Holdings, Inc.
|
54.81% | 1.453 | 11.93% | 0.81x |
|
UPLD
Upland Software, Inc.
|
114.9% | -0.055 | 532.14% | 0.56x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
|
$1.8B | $296M | 14.17% | 15.51% | 11.96% | $1.7B |
|
ATEN
A10 Networks, Inc.
|
$59.9M | $13M | 14.31% | 23.96% | 17.4% | $18.1M |
|
NOW
ServiceNow, Inc.
|
$2.6B | $572M | 13.74% | 16.88% | 16.79% | $569M |
|
PLUS
ePlus, Inc.
|
$155.3M | $48.8M | 11.27% | 11.57% | 8.02% | -$35.8M |
|
TENB
Tenable Holdings, Inc.
|
$195.7M | $7.2M | -4.22% | -8.9% | 2.87% | $51.6M |
|
UPLD
Upland Software, Inc.
|
$32.5M | $6.1M | -11.9% | -41.93% | 12.13% | $6.7M |
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns PANW or ATEN?
A10 Networks, Inc. has a net margin of 13.5% compared to Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s net margin of 16.32%. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.51% beat A10 Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of 23.96%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc.74.21% $0.47 $9B ATENA10 Networks, Inc.80.14% $0.17 $435M -
What do Analysts Say About PANW or ATEN?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a consensus price target of $225.42, signalling upside risk potential of 20.62%. On the other hand A10 Networks, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.17 which suggests that it could grow by 28.99%. Given that A10 Networks, Inc. has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, Inc., analysts believe A10 Networks, Inc. is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc.30 10 3 ATENA10 Networks, Inc.4 2 0 -
Is PANW or ATEN More Risky?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a beta of 0.788, which suggesting that the stock is 21.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison A10 Networks, Inc. has a beta of 1.271, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.113%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PANW or ATEN?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. A10 Networks, Inc. offers a yield of 1.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. A10 Networks, Inc. pays out 36.04% of its earnings as a dividend. A10 Networks, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PANW or ATEN?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than A10 Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues of $74.7M. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s net income of $334M is higher than A10 Networks, Inc.'s net income of $12.2M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 118.53x while A10 Networks, Inc.'s PE ratio is 26.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. is 13.86x versus 4.68x for A10 Networks, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc.13.86x 118.53x $2.5B $334M ATENA10 Networks, Inc.4.68x 26.32x $74.7M $12.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns PANW or NOW?
ServiceNow, Inc. has a net margin of 13.5% compared to Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s net margin of 14.73%. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.51% beat ServiceNow, Inc.'s return on equity of 16.88%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc.74.21% $0.47 $9B NOWServiceNow, Inc.77.28% $0.48 $13.7B -
What do Analysts Say About PANW or NOW?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a consensus price target of $225.42, signalling upside risk potential of 20.62%. On the other hand ServiceNow, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $227.08 which suggests that it could grow by 46.21%. Given that ServiceNow, Inc. has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, Inc., analysts believe ServiceNow, Inc. is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc.30 10 3 NOWServiceNow, Inc.33 4 1 -
Is PANW or NOW More Risky?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a beta of 0.788, which suggesting that the stock is 21.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ServiceNow, Inc. has a beta of 0.971, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.868%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PANW or NOW?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ServiceNow, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ServiceNow, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PANW or NOW?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are smaller than ServiceNow, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s net income of $334M is lower than ServiceNow, Inc.'s net income of $502M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 118.53x while ServiceNow, Inc.'s PE ratio is 45.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. is 13.86x versus 7.70x for ServiceNow, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc.13.86x 118.53x $2.5B $334M NOWServiceNow, Inc.7.70x 45.52x $3.4B $502M
-
Which has Higher Returns PANW or PLUS?
ePlus, Inc. has a net margin of 13.5% compared to Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s net margin of 6.27%. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.51% beat ePlus, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.57%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc.74.21% $0.47 $9B PLUSePlus, Inc.25.51% $1.32 $1B -
What do Analysts Say About PANW or PLUS?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a consensus price target of $225.42, signalling upside risk potential of 20.62%. On the other hand ePlus, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $92.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.76%. Given that Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has higher upside potential than ePlus, Inc., analysts believe Palo Alto Networks, Inc. is more attractive than ePlus, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc.30 10 3 PLUSePlus, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is PANW or PLUS More Risky?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a beta of 0.788, which suggesting that the stock is 21.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus, Inc. has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.259%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PANW or PLUS?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus, Inc. offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PANW or PLUS?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than ePlus, Inc. quarterly revenues of $608.8M. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s net income of $334M is higher than ePlus, Inc.'s net income of $38.2M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 118.53x while ePlus, Inc.'s PE ratio is 20.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. is 13.86x versus 1.06x for ePlus, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc.13.86x 118.53x $2.5B $334M PLUSePlus, Inc.1.06x 20.15x $608.8M $38.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns PANW or TENB?
Tenable Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 13.5% compared to Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s net margin of 0.9%. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.51% beat Tenable Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.9%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc.74.21% $0.47 $9B TENBTenable Holdings, Inc.77.52% $0.02 $762.1M -
What do Analysts Say About PANW or TENB?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a consensus price target of $225.42, signalling upside risk potential of 20.62%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $37.68 which suggests that it could grow by 52.01%. Given that Tenable Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, Inc., analysts believe Tenable Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc.30 10 3 TENBTenable Holdings, Inc.9 10 0 -
Is PANW or TENB More Risky?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a beta of 0.788, which suggesting that the stock is 21.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.727, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.336%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PANW or TENB?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tenable Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PANW or TENB?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Tenable Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $252.4M. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s net income of $334M is higher than Tenable Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $2.3M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 118.53x while Tenable Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. is 13.86x versus 3.10x for Tenable Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc.13.86x 118.53x $2.5B $334M TENBTenable Holdings, Inc.3.10x -- $252.4M $2.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns PANW or UPLD?
Upland Software, Inc. has a net margin of 13.5% compared to Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s net margin of -2.22%. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s return on equity of 15.51% beat Upland Software, Inc.'s return on equity of -41.93%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc.74.21% $0.47 $9B UPLDUpland Software, Inc.64.31% -$0.09 $317.1M -
What do Analysts Say About PANW or UPLD?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a consensus price target of $225.42, signalling upside risk potential of 20.62%. On the other hand Upland Software, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.33 which suggests that it could grow by 196.8%. Given that Upland Software, Inc. has higher upside potential than Palo Alto Networks, Inc., analysts believe Upland Software, Inc. is more attractive than Palo Alto Networks, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc.30 10 3 UPLDUpland Software, Inc.2 0 0 -
Is PANW or UPLD More Risky?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a beta of 0.788, which suggesting that the stock is 21.184% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software, Inc. has a beta of 1.190, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.969%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock PANW or UPLD?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios PANW or UPLD?
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Upland Software, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50.5M. Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s net income of $334M is higher than Upland Software, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 118.53x while Upland Software, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. is 13.86x versus 0.18x for Upland Software, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc.13.86x 118.53x $2.5B $334M UPLDUpland Software, Inc.0.18x -- $50.5M -$1.1M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Berkshire Hathaway Stock Undervalued?
Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A,BRK.B) has undershot the market this year, returning…
Is Oracle Stock Undervalued?
Shares of Oracle (NYSE:ORCL) rocketed higher earlier this year when…
Stock Ideas
Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 62x
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
57
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Sell
1
LW alert for Dec 20
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. [LW] is down 25.96% over the past day.
Buy
54
BMRN alert for Dec 20
BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. [BMRN] is up 17.79% over the past day.
Buy
82
RKLB alert for Dec 20
Rocket Lab Corp. [RKLB] is up 17.72% over the past day.
