ATEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ePlus has a net margin of 18.94% compared to A10 Networks's net margin of 6.08%. A10 Networks's return on equity of 23.68% beat ePlus's return on equity of 12.01%.

A10 Networks has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.99%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 21.19%. Given that ePlus has higher upside potential than A10 Networks, analysts believe ePlus is more attractive than A10 Networks.

A10 Networks has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.811% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.876%.

A10 Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A10 Networks pays 44.58% of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A10 Networks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A10 Networks quarterly revenues are $66.7M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $515.2M. A10 Networks's net income of $12.6M is lower than ePlus's net income of $31.3M. Notably, A10 Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.64x while ePlus's PE ratio is 18.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A10 Networks is 5.40x versus 0.93x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of 18.94% compared to A10 Networks's net margin of 9.02%. A10 Networks's return on equity of 23.68% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 5.77%.

A10 Networks has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.99%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14%. Given that Red Violet has higher upside potential than A10 Networks, analysts believe Red Violet is more attractive than A10 Networks.

A10 Networks has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.811% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.029%.

A10 Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A10 Networks pays 44.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A10 Networks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A10 Networks quarterly revenues are $66.7M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $19.1M. A10 Networks's net income of $12.6M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $1.7M. Notably, A10 Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.64x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 104.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A10 Networks is 5.40x versus 7.54x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenable Holdings has a net margin of 18.94% compared to A10 Networks's net margin of -4.06%. A10 Networks's return on equity of 23.68% beat Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -16.46%.

A10 Networks has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.99%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $48.51 which suggests that it could grow by 18.18%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than A10 Networks, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than A10 Networks.

A10 Networks has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.811% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.827, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.284%.

A10 Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. Tenable Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A10 Networks pays 44.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A10 Networks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A10 Networks quarterly revenues are $66.7M, which are smaller than Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues of $227.1M. A10 Networks's net income of $12.6M is higher than Tenable Holdings's net income of -$9.2M. Notably, A10 Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.64x while Tenable Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A10 Networks is 5.40x versus 5.52x for Tenable Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 18.94% compared to A10 Networks's net margin of -2.6%. A10 Networks's return on equity of 23.68% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -69.75%.

A10 Networks has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.99%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -28.79%. Given that A10 Networks has higher upside potential than Upland Software, analysts believe A10 Networks is more attractive than Upland Software.

A10 Networks has a beta of 1.158, which suggesting that the stock is 15.811% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.379%.

A10 Networks has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.3%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. A10 Networks pays 44.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. A10 Networks's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

A10 Networks quarterly revenues are $66.7M, which are larger than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $66.7M. A10 Networks's net income of $12.6M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, A10 Networks's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.64x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for A10 Networks is 5.40x versus 0.44x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.