Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Buy
55
OMSE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$4.70
Seasonality move
:
--
Day range:
$4.70 - $4.89
52-week range:
$3.27 - $9.86
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
6.92x
P/S ratio:
1.52x
P/B ratio:
2.41x
Volume:
17.9K
Avg. volume:
67.2K
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$203.8M
Revenue:
$203.6M
EPS (TTM):
$1.06
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OMSE
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.
|
$60.1M | $0.27 | -- | -- | $10.00 |
|
CAOLF
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DLXY
Delixy Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JDSEF
Jadestone Energy Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MTQCF
MTQ Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
REXHF
Rex International Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OMSE
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.
|
$4.80 | $10.00 | $203.8M | 6.92x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.52x |
|
CAOLF
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.
|
$1.16 | -- | $997.8M | 11.60x | $0.03 | 2.39% | 0.06x |
|
DLXY
Delixy Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
JDSEF
Jadestone Energy Plc
|
$0.29 | -- | $156.4M | 7.92x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.36x |
|
MTQCF
MTQ Corp. Ltd.
|
$0.2269 | -- | $50.4M | 151.50x | $0.00 | 3.39% | 1.27x |
|
REXHF
Rex International Holding Ltd.
|
$0.10 | -- | $131.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.45x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OMSE
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 3.64x |
|
CAOLF
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -0.665 | -- | 1.55x |
|
DLXY
Delixy Holdings
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
JDSEF
Jadestone Energy Plc
|
95.42% | 0.245 | 147.16% | 0.82x |
|
MTQCF
MTQ Corp. Ltd.
|
16.91% | 321.427 | -- | 1.59x |
|
REXHF
Rex International Holding Ltd.
|
83.28% | -0.104 | -- | 1.28x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OMSE
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.
|
-- | -- | 35.3% | 35.3% | -- | -- |
|
CAOLF
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 8.11% | 8.11% | -- | -- |
|
DLXY
Delixy Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JDSEF
Jadestone Energy Plc
|
-- | -- | -29.97% | -112.45% | -- | -- |
|
MTQCF
MTQ Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 5.24% | 6.05% | -- | -- |
|
REXHF
Rex International Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -28.73% | -85.47% | -- | -- |
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns OMSE or CAOLF?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of --. OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 35.3% beat China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.11%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital OMSEOMS Energy Technologies, Inc.-- -- $134.6M CAOLFChina Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.-- -- $989.9M -
What do Analysts Say About OMSE or CAOLF?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 108.33%. On the other hand China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd., analysts believe OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings OMSEOMS Energy Technologies, Inc.2 0 0 CAOLFChina Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is OMSE or CAOLF More Risky?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has a beta of -0.105, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.486%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OMSE or CAOLF?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. pays out 30.57% of its earnings as a dividend. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OMSE or CAOLF?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.92x while China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 11.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. is 1.52x versus 0.06x for China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income OMSEOMS Energy Technologies, Inc.1.52x 6.92x -- -- CAOLFChina Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.0.06x 11.60x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns OMSE or DLXY?
Delixy Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of --. OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 35.3% beat Delixy Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital OMSEOMS Energy Technologies, Inc.-- -- $134.6M DLXYDelixy Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About OMSE or DLXY?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 108.33%. On the other hand Delixy Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Delixy Holdings, analysts believe OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Delixy Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings OMSEOMS Energy Technologies, Inc.2 0 0 DLXYDelixy Holdings0 0 0 -
Is OMSE or DLXY More Risky?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delixy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OMSE or DLXY?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Delixy Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Delixy Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OMSE or DLXY?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Delixy Holdings quarterly revenues of --. OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Delixy Holdings's net income of --. Notably, OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.92x while Delixy Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. is 1.52x versus -- for Delixy Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income OMSEOMS Energy Technologies, Inc.1.52x 6.92x -- -- DLXYDelixy Holdings-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns OMSE or JDSEF?
Jadestone Energy Plc has a net margin of -- compared to OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of --. OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 35.3% beat Jadestone Energy Plc's return on equity of -112.45%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital OMSEOMS Energy Technologies, Inc.-- -- $134.6M JDSEFJadestone Energy Plc-- -- $208.5M -
What do Analysts Say About OMSE or JDSEF?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 108.33%. On the other hand Jadestone Energy Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Jadestone Energy Plc, analysts believe OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Jadestone Energy Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings OMSEOMS Energy Technologies, Inc.2 0 0 JDSEFJadestone Energy Plc0 0 0 -
Is OMSE or JDSEF More Risky?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jadestone Energy Plc has a beta of 0.157, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.343%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OMSE or JDSEF?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jadestone Energy Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jadestone Energy Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OMSE or JDSEF?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Jadestone Energy Plc quarterly revenues of --. OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Jadestone Energy Plc's net income of --. Notably, OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.92x while Jadestone Energy Plc's PE ratio is 7.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. is 1.52x versus 0.36x for Jadestone Energy Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income OMSEOMS Energy Technologies, Inc.1.52x 6.92x -- -- JDSEFJadestone Energy Plc0.36x 7.92x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns OMSE or MTQCF?
MTQ Corp. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of --. OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 35.3% beat MTQ Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital OMSEOMS Energy Technologies, Inc.-- -- $134.6M MTQCFMTQ Corp. Ltd.-- -- $72.8M -
What do Analysts Say About OMSE or MTQCF?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 108.33%. On the other hand MTQ Corp. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than MTQ Corp. Ltd., analysts believe OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than MTQ Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings OMSEOMS Energy Technologies, Inc.2 0 0 MTQCFMTQ Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is OMSE or MTQCF More Risky?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MTQ Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OMSE or MTQCF?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MTQ Corp. Ltd. offers a yield of 3.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MTQ Corp. Ltd. pays out 46.42% of its earnings as a dividend. MTQ Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OMSE or MTQCF?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MTQ Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than MTQ Corp. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.92x while MTQ Corp. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 151.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. is 1.52x versus 1.27x for MTQ Corp. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income OMSEOMS Energy Technologies, Inc.1.52x 6.92x -- -- MTQCFMTQ Corp. Ltd.1.27x 151.50x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns OMSE or REXHF?
Rex International Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s net margin of --. OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 35.3% beat Rex International Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -85.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital OMSEOMS Energy Technologies, Inc.-- -- $134.6M REXHFRex International Holding Ltd.-- -- $200.1M -
What do Analysts Say About OMSE or REXHF?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has a consensus price target of $10.00, signalling upside risk potential of 108.33%. On the other hand Rex International Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rex International Holding Ltd., analysts believe OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than Rex International Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings OMSEOMS Energy Technologies, Inc.2 0 0 REXHFRex International Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is OMSE or REXHF More Risky?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rex International Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.054, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.585%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock OMSE or REXHF?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rex International Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rex International Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios OMSE or REXHF?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rex International Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s net income of -- is lower than Rex International Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 6.92x while Rex International Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. is 1.52x versus 0.45x for Rex International Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income OMSEOMS Energy Technologies, Inc.1.52x 6.92x -- -- REXHFRex International Holding Ltd.0.45x -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
69
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
47
PSTG alert for Dec 4
Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.
Sell
41
SMX alert for Dec 4
SMX (Security Matters) Plc [SMX] is up 154.74% over the past day.
Sell
43
HY alert for Dec 5
Hyster-Yale, Inc. [HY] is up 1.92% over the past day.
