Is Amazon an AI Stock?
With the market starting to look skittish on pure-play AI…
Buy
70
CAOLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.16
Seasonality move
:
-5.58%
Day range:
$1.16 - $1.16
52-week range:
$0.55 - $1.16
Dividend yield:
2.39%
P/E ratio:
11.60x
P/S ratio:
0.06x
P/B ratio:
1.20x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
3
1-year change:
110.53%
Market cap:
$997.8M
Revenue:
$15.5B
EPS (TTM):
$0.10
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAOLF
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DLXY
Delixy Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JDSEF
Jadestone Energy Plc
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MTQCF
MTQ Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OMSE
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.
|
$60.1M | $0.27 | -- | -- | $10.00 |
|
REXHF
Rex International Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAOLF
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.
|
$1.16 | -- | $997.8M | 11.60x | $0.03 | 2.39% | 0.06x |
|
DLXY
Delixy Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
JDSEF
Jadestone Energy Plc
|
$0.29 | -- | $156.4M | 7.92x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.36x |
|
MTQCF
MTQ Corp. Ltd.
|
$0.2269 | -- | $50.4M | 151.50x | $0.00 | 3.39% | 1.27x |
|
OMSE
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.
|
$4.80 | $10.00 | $203.8M | 6.92x | $0.00 | 0% | 1.52x |
|
REXHF
Rex International Holding Ltd.
|
$0.10 | -- | $131.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.45x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAOLF
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -0.665 | -- | 1.55x |
|
DLXY
Delixy Holdings
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
JDSEF
Jadestone Energy Plc
|
95.42% | 0.245 | 147.16% | 0.82x |
|
MTQCF
MTQ Corp. Ltd.
|
16.91% | 321.427 | -- | 1.59x |
|
OMSE
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 3.64x |
|
REXHF
Rex International Holding Ltd.
|
83.28% | -0.104 | -- | 1.28x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
CAOLF
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 8.11% | 8.11% | -- | -- |
|
DLXY
Delixy Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
JDSEF
Jadestone Energy Plc
|
-- | -- | -29.97% | -112.45% | -- | -- |
|
MTQCF
MTQ Corp. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | 5.24% | 6.05% | -- | -- |
|
OMSE
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.
|
-- | -- | 35.3% | 35.3% | -- | -- |
|
REXHF
Rex International Holding Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -28.73% | -85.47% | -- | -- |
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOLF or DLXY?
Delixy Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.11% beat Delixy Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOLFChina Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.-- -- $989.9M DLXYDelixy Holdings-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About CAOLF or DLXY?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Delixy Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Delixy Holdings, analysts believe China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. is more attractive than Delixy Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOLFChina Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 DLXYDelixy Holdings0 0 0 -
Is CAOLF or DLXY More Risky?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has a beta of -0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 110.486% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delixy Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOLF or DLXY?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Delixy Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. pays 30.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Delixy Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOLF or DLXY?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Delixy Holdings quarterly revenues of --. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Delixy Holdings's net income of --. Notably, China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.60x while Delixy Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. is 0.06x versus -- for Delixy Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOLFChina Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.0.06x 11.60x -- -- DLXYDelixy Holdings-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOLF or JDSEF?
Jadestone Energy Plc has a net margin of -- compared to China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.11% beat Jadestone Energy Plc's return on equity of -112.45%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOLFChina Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.-- -- $989.9M JDSEFJadestone Energy Plc-- -- $208.5M -
What do Analysts Say About CAOLF or JDSEF?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jadestone Energy Plc has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Jadestone Energy Plc, analysts believe China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. is more attractive than Jadestone Energy Plc.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOLFChina Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 JDSEFJadestone Energy Plc0 0 0 -
Is CAOLF or JDSEF More Risky?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has a beta of -0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 110.486% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jadestone Energy Plc has a beta of 0.157, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.343%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOLF or JDSEF?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Jadestone Energy Plc offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. pays 30.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Jadestone Energy Plc pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOLF or JDSEF?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Jadestone Energy Plc quarterly revenues of --. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Jadestone Energy Plc's net income of --. Notably, China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.60x while Jadestone Energy Plc's PE ratio is 7.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. is 0.06x versus 0.36x for Jadestone Energy Plc. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOLFChina Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.0.06x 11.60x -- -- JDSEFJadestone Energy Plc0.36x 7.92x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOLF or MTQCF?
MTQ Corp. Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.11% beat MTQ Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 6.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOLFChina Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.-- -- $989.9M MTQCFMTQ Corp. Ltd.-- -- $72.8M -
What do Analysts Say About CAOLF or MTQCF?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MTQ Corp. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has higher upside potential than MTQ Corp. Ltd., analysts believe China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. is more attractive than MTQ Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOLFChina Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 MTQCFMTQ Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CAOLF or MTQCF More Risky?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has a beta of -0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 110.486% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MTQ Corp. Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOLF or MTQCF?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. MTQ Corp. Ltd. offers a yield of 3.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. pays 30.57% of its earnings as a dividend. MTQ Corp. Ltd. pays out 46.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOLF or MTQCF?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MTQ Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than MTQ Corp. Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.60x while MTQ Corp. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 151.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. is 0.06x versus 1.27x for MTQ Corp. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOLFChina Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.0.06x 11.60x -- -- MTQCFMTQ Corp. Ltd.1.27x 151.50x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOLF or OMSE?
OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of -- compared to China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.11% beat OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 35.3%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOLFChina Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.-- -- $989.9M OMSEOMS Energy Technologies, Inc.-- -- $134.6M -
What do Analysts Say About CAOLF or OMSE?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 108.33%. Given that OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has higher upside potential than China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd., analysts believe OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. is more attractive than China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOLFChina Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 OMSEOMS Energy Technologies, Inc.2 0 0 -
Is CAOLF or OMSE More Risky?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has a beta of -0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 110.486% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOLF or OMSE?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. pays 30.57% of its earnings as a dividend. OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOLF or OMSE?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than OMS Energy Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.60x while OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 6.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. is 0.06x versus 1.52x for OMS Energy Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOLFChina Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.0.06x 11.60x -- -- OMSEOMS Energy Technologies, Inc.1.52x 6.92x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns CAOLF or REXHF?
Rex International Holding Ltd. has a net margin of -- compared to China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s net margin of --. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s return on equity of 8.11% beat Rex International Holding Ltd.'s return on equity of -85.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital CAOLFChina Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.-- -- $989.9M REXHFRex International Holding Ltd.-- -- $200.1M -
What do Analysts Say About CAOLF or REXHF?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rex International Holding Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has higher upside potential than Rex International Holding Ltd., analysts believe China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. is more attractive than Rex International Holding Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings CAOLFChina Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.0 0 0 REXHFRex International Holding Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is CAOLF or REXHF More Risky?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has a beta of -0.105, which suggesting that the stock is 110.486% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rex International Holding Ltd. has a beta of 0.054, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.585%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock CAOLF or REXHF?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Rex International Holding Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. pays 30.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Rex International Holding Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios CAOLF or REXHF?
China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Rex International Holding Ltd. quarterly revenues of --. China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s net income of -- is lower than Rex International Holding Ltd.'s net income of --. Notably, China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 11.60x while Rex International Holding Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for China Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd. is 0.06x versus 0.45x for Rex International Holding Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income CAOLFChina Aviation Oil (Singapore) Corp. Ltd.0.06x 11.60x -- -- REXHFRex International Holding Ltd.0.45x -- -- --
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Google Vs NVIDIA Stock: Which Is Best?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVIDIA) are two of the market’s…
How High Could NVIDIA Stock Go?
NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) has been one of the best stocks to…
Stock Ideas
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.4T
P/E Ratio: 61x
Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.1T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
67
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Alerts
Sell
47
PSTG alert for Dec 5
Pure Storage, Inc. [PSTG] is up 5.05% over the past day.
Sell
38
HOV alert for Dec 5
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. [HOV] is down 22.58% over the past day.
Buy
69
ASTS alert for Dec 5
AST Spacemobile, Inc. [ASTS] is up 18.25% over the past day.
