Is Celestica The Best AI Stock to Buy Now?
Technology and hardware business Celestica (NYSE:CLS) has seen massive upward…
Sell
47
NNDM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$2.00
Seasonality move
:
-24.46%
Day range:
$2.00 - $2.06
52-week range:
$1.31 - $2.34
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
5.26x
P/B ratio:
0.70x
Volume:
835.2K
Avg. volume:
3M
1-year change:
-13.42%
Market cap:
$420.7M
Revenue:
$58M
EPS (TTM):
-$1.24
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NNDM
Nano Dimension Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESYL
Easylink Solutions Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
$156.8M | $0.27 | 9.97% | 23.44% | $18.00 |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NNDM
Nano Dimension Ltd.
|
$2.00 | -- | $420.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 5.26x |
|
ESYL
Easylink Solutions Corp.
|
$0.0060 | -- | $33.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
$120.70 | -- | $1.9B | 26.42x | $0.52 | 2.03% | 0.65x |
|
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
|
$80.65 | -- | $1.9B | 25.62x | $0.31 | 1.79% | 2.49x |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
$19.40 | $18.00 | $952.5M | 23.89x | $0.15 | 3.99% | 1.58x |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
$1.19 | -- | $24.2M | 8.51x | $0.22 | 18.49% | 1.25x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NNDM
Nano Dimension Ltd.
|
5.36% | 2.382 | 10.02% | 10.81x |
|
ESYL
Easylink Solutions Corp.
|
-- | -5.892 | -- | -- |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
45.09% | 1.956 | 21.91% | 0.94x |
|
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
|
18.1% | 0.385 | 4.16% | 1.00x |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
25.78% | 0.766 | 10.75% | 1.37x |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
4.15% | -0.778 | 4.29% | 3.35x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NNDM
Nano Dimension Ltd.
|
$8.2M | -$30.6M | -9.46% | -9.72% | -113.13% | -$40.3M |
|
ESYL
Easylink Solutions Corp.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.
|
$136.3M | $54.8M | 8.65% | 12.6% | 7.83% | -- |
|
HLTEF
Hilan Ltd.
|
$47.7M | $23.2M | 17.7% | 22.26% | 10.89% | $34.4M |
|
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
|
$44.2M | $17.3M | 12.1% | 15.76% | 10.7% | $19.9M |
|
MNDO
MIND C.T.I. Ltd.
|
$2.6M | $644K | 12.49% | 12.95% | 13.35% | $1.3M |
Nano Dimension Ltd. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NNDM or ESYL?
Easylink Solutions Corp. has a net margin of -109.74% compared to Nano Dimension Ltd.'s net margin of --. Nano Dimension Ltd.'s return on equity of -9.72% beat Easylink Solutions Corp.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NNDMNano Dimension Ltd.30.29% -$0.25 $637M ESYLEasylink Solutions Corp.-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About NNDM or ESYL?
Nano Dimension Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 400%. On the other hand Easylink Solutions Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nano Dimension Ltd. has higher upside potential than Easylink Solutions Corp., analysts believe Nano Dimension Ltd. is more attractive than Easylink Solutions Corp..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NNDMNano Dimension Ltd.0 0 0 ESYLEasylink Solutions Corp.0 0 0 -
Is NNDM or ESYL More Risky?
Nano Dimension Ltd. has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 8.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Easylink Solutions Corp. has a beta of 1.143, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.311%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NNDM or ESYL?
Nano Dimension Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Easylink Solutions Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Dimension Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Easylink Solutions Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NNDM or ESYL?
Nano Dimension Ltd. quarterly revenues are $27M, which are larger than Easylink Solutions Corp. quarterly revenues of --. Nano Dimension Ltd.'s net income of -$29.6M is higher than Easylink Solutions Corp.'s net income of --. Notably, Nano Dimension Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Easylink Solutions Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Dimension Ltd. is 5.26x versus -- for Easylink Solutions Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NNDMNano Dimension Ltd.5.26x -- $27M -$29.6M ESYLEasylink Solutions Corp.-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns NNDM or FORTY?
Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a net margin of -109.74% compared to Nano Dimension Ltd.'s net margin of 4.98%. Nano Dimension Ltd.'s return on equity of -9.72% beat Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.6%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NNDMNano Dimension Ltd.30.29% -$0.25 $637M FORTYFormula Systems (1985) Ltd.19.48% $1.09 $2.2B -
What do Analysts Say About NNDM or FORTY?
Nano Dimension Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 400%. On the other hand Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nano Dimension Ltd. has higher upside potential than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd., analysts believe Nano Dimension Ltd. is more attractive than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NNDMNano Dimension Ltd.0 0 0 FORTYFormula Systems (1985) Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NNDM or FORTY More Risky?
Nano Dimension Ltd. has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 8.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. has a beta of 1.057, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.735%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NNDM or FORTY?
Nano Dimension Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. offers a yield of 2.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Nano Dimension Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. pays out 22.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NNDM or FORTY?
Nano Dimension Ltd. quarterly revenues are $27M, which are smaller than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd. quarterly revenues of $699.9M. Nano Dimension Ltd.'s net income of -$29.6M is lower than Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s net income of $34.9M. Notably, Nano Dimension Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.'s PE ratio is 26.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Dimension Ltd. is 5.26x versus 0.65x for Formula Systems (1985) Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NNDMNano Dimension Ltd.5.26x -- $27M -$29.6M FORTYFormula Systems (1985) Ltd.0.65x 26.42x $699.9M $34.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns NNDM or HLTEF?
Hilan Ltd. has a net margin of -109.74% compared to Nano Dimension Ltd.'s net margin of 7.82%. Nano Dimension Ltd.'s return on equity of -9.72% beat Hilan Ltd.'s return on equity of 22.26%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NNDMNano Dimension Ltd.30.29% -$0.25 $637M HLTEFHilan Ltd.22.38% $0.71 $453.7M -
What do Analysts Say About NNDM or HLTEF?
Nano Dimension Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 400%. On the other hand Hilan Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nano Dimension Ltd. has higher upside potential than Hilan Ltd., analysts believe Nano Dimension Ltd. is more attractive than Hilan Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NNDMNano Dimension Ltd.0 0 0 HLTEFHilan Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NNDM or HLTEF More Risky?
Nano Dimension Ltd. has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 8.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hilan Ltd. has a beta of -0.011, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.074%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NNDM or HLTEF?
Nano Dimension Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hilan Ltd. offers a yield of 1.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Nano Dimension Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hilan Ltd. pays out 27.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Hilan Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NNDM or HLTEF?
Nano Dimension Ltd. quarterly revenues are $27M, which are smaller than Hilan Ltd. quarterly revenues of $213.1M. Nano Dimension Ltd.'s net income of -$29.6M is lower than Hilan Ltd.'s net income of $16.7M. Notably, Nano Dimension Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hilan Ltd.'s PE ratio is 25.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Dimension Ltd. is 5.26x versus 2.49x for Hilan Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NNDMNano Dimension Ltd.5.26x -- $27M -$29.6M HLTEFHilan Ltd.2.49x 25.62x $213.1M $16.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns NNDM or MGIC?
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has a net margin of -109.74% compared to Nano Dimension Ltd.'s net margin of 7.39%. Nano Dimension Ltd.'s return on equity of -9.72% beat Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s return on equity of 15.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NNDMNano Dimension Ltd.30.29% -$0.25 $637M MGICMagic Software Enterprises Ltd.27.35% $0.20 $396.7M -
What do Analysts Say About NNDM or MGIC?
Nano Dimension Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 400%. On the other hand Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could fall by -7.22%. Given that Nano Dimension Ltd. has higher upside potential than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd., analysts believe Nano Dimension Ltd. is more attractive than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NNDMNano Dimension Ltd.0 0 0 MGICMagic Software Enterprises Ltd.0 1 0 -
Is NNDM or MGIC More Risky?
Nano Dimension Ltd. has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 8.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. has a beta of 0.725, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.526%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NNDM or MGIC?
Nano Dimension Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. offers a yield of 3.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Nano Dimension Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. pays out 58.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NNDM or MGIC?
Nano Dimension Ltd. quarterly revenues are $27M, which are smaller than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. quarterly revenues of $161.7M. Nano Dimension Ltd.'s net income of -$29.6M is lower than Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s net income of $12M. Notably, Nano Dimension Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.'s PE ratio is 23.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Dimension Ltd. is 5.26x versus 1.58x for Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NNDMNano Dimension Ltd.5.26x -- $27M -$29.6M MGICMagic Software Enterprises Ltd.1.58x 23.89x $161.7M $12M
-
Which has Higher Returns NNDM or MNDO?
MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has a net margin of -109.74% compared to Nano Dimension Ltd.'s net margin of 14.12%. Nano Dimension Ltd.'s return on equity of -9.72% beat MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s return on equity of 12.95%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NNDMNano Dimension Ltd.30.29% -$0.25 $637M MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd.52.93% $0.03 $23.1M -
What do Analysts Say About NNDM or MNDO?
Nano Dimension Ltd. has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 400%. On the other hand MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nano Dimension Ltd. has higher upside potential than MIND C.T.I. Ltd., analysts believe Nano Dimension Ltd. is more attractive than MIND C.T.I. Ltd..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NNDMNano Dimension Ltd.0 0 0 MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd.0 0 0 -
Is NNDM or MNDO More Risky?
Nano Dimension Ltd. has a beta of 0.910, which suggesting that the stock is 8.975% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MIND C.T.I. Ltd. has a beta of 0.585, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.497%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NNDM or MNDO?
Nano Dimension Ltd. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MIND C.T.I. Ltd. offers a yield of 18.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Nano Dimension Ltd. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MIND C.T.I. Ltd. pays out 106.67% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NNDM or MNDO?
Nano Dimension Ltd. quarterly revenues are $27M, which are larger than MIND C.T.I. Ltd. quarterly revenues of $4.8M. Nano Dimension Ltd.'s net income of -$29.6M is lower than MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s net income of $681K. Notably, Nano Dimension Ltd.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MIND C.T.I. Ltd.'s PE ratio is 8.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Dimension Ltd. is 5.26x versus 1.25x for MIND C.T.I. Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NNDMNano Dimension Ltd.5.26x -- $27M -$29.6M MNDOMIND C.T.I. Ltd.1.25x 8.51x $4.8M $681K
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will AI Disrupt SaaS Software Stocks?
Since January 28th, software stocks in the United States have…
Why Is Meta Stock Going Higher?
Over the last five days, shares of Instagram and Facebook…
Stock Ideas
Buy
55
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.6T
P/E Ratio: 65x
Sell
50
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 35x
Sell
40
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 29x
Alerts
Buy
77
RNG alert for Feb 23
RingCentral, Inc. [RNG] is down 12.48% over the past day.
Sell
9
FROG alert for Feb 23
JFrog Ltd. [FROG] is down 7.95% over the past day.
Buy
72
SNSE alert for Feb 23
Sensei Biotherapeutics, Inc. [SNSE] is down 2.63% over the past day.
