NKLA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Art's-Way Manufacturing has a net margin of -793.38% compared to Nikola's net margin of -0.45%. Nikola's return on equity of -112.88% beat Art's-Way Manufacturing's return on equity of -7.27%.

Nikola has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 916.39%. On the other hand Art's-Way Manufacturing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 280.44%. Given that Nikola has higher upside potential than Art's-Way Manufacturing, analysts believe Nikola is more attractive than Art's-Way Manufacturing.

Nikola has a beta of 1.994, which suggesting that the stock is 99.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Art's-Way Manufacturing has a beta of 0.346, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.443%.

Nikola has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Art's-Way Manufacturing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nikola pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Art's-Way Manufacturing pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nikola quarterly revenues are $25.2M, which are larger than Art's-Way Manufacturing quarterly revenues of $5.9M. Nikola's net income of -$199.8M is lower than Art's-Way Manufacturing's net income of -$26.2K. Notably, Nikola's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Art's-Way Manufacturing's PE ratio is 34.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nikola is 0.72x versus 0.37x for Art's-Way Manufacturing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CEA Industries has a net margin of -793.38% compared to Nikola's net margin of -189.45%. Nikola's return on equity of -112.88% beat CEA Industries's return on equity of -26.82%.

Nikola has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 916.39%. On the other hand CEA Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nikola has higher upside potential than CEA Industries, analysts believe Nikola is more attractive than CEA Industries.

Nikola has a beta of 1.994, which suggesting that the stock is 99.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CEA Industries has a beta of 0.942, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.771%.

Nikola has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CEA Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nikola pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CEA Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nikola quarterly revenues are $25.2M, which are larger than CEA Industries quarterly revenues of $390.8K. Nikola's net income of -$199.8M is lower than CEA Industries's net income of -$740.4K. Notably, Nikola's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CEA Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nikola is 0.72x versus 2.16x for CEA Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a net margin of -793.38% compared to Nikola's net margin of -29.87%. Nikola's return on equity of -112.88% beat Hydrofarm Holdings Group's return on equity of -23.5%.

Nikola has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 916.39%. On the other hand Hydrofarm Holdings Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.36%. Given that Nikola has higher upside potential than Hydrofarm Holdings Group, analysts believe Nikola is more attractive than Hydrofarm Holdings Group.

Nikola has a beta of 1.994, which suggesting that the stock is 99.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrofarm Holdings Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nikola has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hydrofarm Holdings Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nikola pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrofarm Holdings Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nikola quarterly revenues are $25.2M, which are smaller than Hydrofarm Holdings Group quarterly revenues of $44M. Nikola's net income of -$199.8M is lower than Hydrofarm Holdings Group's net income of -$13.1M. Notably, Nikola's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hydrofarm Holdings Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nikola is 0.72x versus 0.15x for Hydrofarm Holdings Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Urban-gro has a net margin of -793.38% compared to Nikola's net margin of -13.78%. Nikola's return on equity of -112.88% beat Urban-gro's return on equity of -65.43%.

Nikola has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 916.39%. On the other hand Urban-gro has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nikola has higher upside potential than Urban-gro, analysts believe Nikola is more attractive than Urban-gro.

Nikola has a beta of 1.994, which suggesting that the stock is 99.369% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Urban-gro has a beta of 1.793, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.33%.

Nikola has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Urban-gro offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nikola pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Urban-gro pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nikola quarterly revenues are $25.2M, which are larger than Urban-gro quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Nikola's net income of -$199.8M is lower than Urban-gro's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Nikola's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Urban-gro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nikola is 0.72x versus 0.16x for Urban-gro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.