MYFW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 9.47% compared to First Western Financial's net margin of 16.32%. First Western Financial's return on equity of 1.02% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

First Western Financial has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.48%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $50.05 which suggests that it could grow by 16.97%. Given that First Western Financial has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe First Western Financial is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

First Western Financial has a beta of 0.684, which suggesting that the stock is 31.571% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.33%.

First Western Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. First Western Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Western Financial quarterly revenues are $22.5M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. First Western Financial's net income of $2.1M is lower than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, First Western Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.13x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 12.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Western Financial is 2.05x versus 2.83x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings has a net margin of 9.47% compared to First Western Financial's net margin of 32.77%. First Western Financial's return on equity of 1.02% beat OptimumBank Holdings's return on equity of 14.69%.

First Western Financial has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.48%. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.76%. Given that First Western Financial has higher upside potential than OptimumBank Holdings, analysts believe First Western Financial is more attractive than OptimumBank Holdings.

First Western Financial has a beta of 0.684, which suggesting that the stock is 31.571% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings has a beta of 0.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.

First Western Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. OptimumBank Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. First Western Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

First Western Financial quarterly revenues are $22.5M, which are larger than OptimumBank Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.1M. First Western Financial's net income of $2.1M is lower than OptimumBank Holdings's net income of $3.3M. Notably, First Western Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.13x while OptimumBank Holdings's PE ratio is 3.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Western Financial is 2.05x versus 1.13x for OptimumBank Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 9.47% compared to First Western Financial's net margin of 27.77%. First Western Financial's return on equity of 1.02% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

First Western Financial has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.48%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $181.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.96%. Given that First Western Financial has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe First Western Financial is more attractive than Park National.

First Western Financial has a beta of 0.684, which suggesting that the stock is 31.571% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

First Western Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park National offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. First Western Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First Western Financial quarterly revenues are $22.5M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. First Western Financial's net income of $2.1M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, First Western Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.13x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Western Financial is 2.05x versus 5.63x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 9.47% compared to First Western Financial's net margin of 24.66%. First Western Financial's return on equity of 1.02% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 9.88%.

First Western Financial has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.48%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $83.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.77%. Given that First Western Financial has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial, analysts believe First Western Financial is more attractive than Tompkins Financial.

First Western Financial has a beta of 0.684, which suggesting that the stock is 31.571% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.735, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.471%.

First Western Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. First Western Financial pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 363.09% of its earnings as a dividend.

First Western Financial quarterly revenues are $22.5M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $75.6M. First Western Financial's net income of $2.1M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $18.6M. Notably, First Western Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.13x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 14.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First Western Financial is 2.05x versus 3.31x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.