MVIS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Banzai International, Inc. has a net margin of -5899.17% compared to MicroVision, Inc.'s net margin of -206.98%. MicroVision, Inc.'s return on equity of -131.66% beat Banzai International, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

MicroVision, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 171.24%. On the other hand Banzai International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1011.11%. Given that Banzai International, Inc. has higher upside potential than MicroVision, Inc., analysts believe Banzai International, Inc. is more attractive than MicroVision, Inc..

MicroVision, Inc. has a beta of 1.287, which suggesting that the stock is 28.65% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Banzai International, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Banzai International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MicroVision, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Banzai International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MicroVision, Inc. quarterly revenues are $241K, which are smaller than Banzai International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.8M. MicroVision, Inc.'s net income of -$14.2M is lower than Banzai International, Inc.'s net income of -$5.9M. Notably, MicroVision, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Banzai International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroVision, Inc. is 87.93x versus 0.88x for Banzai International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AEye, Inc. has a net margin of -5899.17% compared to MicroVision, Inc.'s net margin of -18660%. MicroVision, Inc.'s return on equity of -131.66% beat AEye, Inc.'s return on equity of -129.85%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 171.24%. On the other hand AEye, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 176.5%. Given that AEye, Inc. has higher upside potential than MicroVision, Inc., analysts believe AEye, Inc. is more attractive than MicroVision, Inc..

MicroVision, Inc. has a beta of 1.287, which suggesting that the stock is 28.65% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AEye, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AEye, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MicroVision, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AEye, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MicroVision, Inc. quarterly revenues are $241K, which are larger than AEye, Inc. quarterly revenues of $50K. MicroVision, Inc.'s net income of -$14.2M is lower than AEye, Inc.'s net income of -$9.3M. Notably, MicroVision, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AEye, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroVision, Inc. is 87.93x versus 229.46x for AEye, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pagaya Technologies Ltd. has a net margin of -5899.17% compared to MicroVision, Inc.'s net margin of 6.85%. MicroVision, Inc.'s return on equity of -131.66% beat Pagaya Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of -44.22%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 171.24%. On the other hand Pagaya Technologies Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $40.50 which suggests that it could grow by 55.59%. Given that MicroVision, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pagaya Technologies Ltd., analysts believe MicroVision, Inc. is more attractive than Pagaya Technologies Ltd..

MicroVision, Inc. has a beta of 1.287, which suggesting that the stock is 28.65% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pagaya Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pagaya Technologies Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MicroVision, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pagaya Technologies Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MicroVision, Inc. quarterly revenues are $241K, which are smaller than Pagaya Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues of $339.9M. MicroVision, Inc.'s net income of -$14.2M is lower than Pagaya Technologies Ltd.'s net income of $23.3M. Notably, MicroVision, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pagaya Technologies Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroVision, Inc. is 87.93x versus 1.72x for Pagaya Technologies Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spruce Power Holding Corp. has a net margin of -5899.17% compared to MicroVision, Inc.'s net margin of -2.2%. MicroVision, Inc.'s return on equity of -131.66% beat Spruce Power Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -17.77%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 171.24%. On the other hand Spruce Power Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 848.62%. Given that Spruce Power Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than MicroVision, Inc., analysts believe Spruce Power Holding Corp. is more attractive than MicroVision, Inc..

MicroVision, Inc. has a beta of 1.287, which suggesting that the stock is 28.65% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spruce Power Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.261, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.146%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spruce Power Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MicroVision, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spruce Power Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MicroVision, Inc. quarterly revenues are $241K, which are smaller than Spruce Power Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $30.7M. MicroVision, Inc.'s net income of -$14.2M is lower than Spruce Power Holding Corp.'s net income of -$677K. Notably, MicroVision, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spruce Power Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroVision, Inc. is 87.93x versus 0.85x for Spruce Power Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.