MVIS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Banzai International, Inc. has a net margin of -5899.17% compared to MicroVision, Inc.'s net margin of -206.98%. MicroVision, Inc.'s return on equity of -131.66% beat Banzai International, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

MicroVision, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 258.01%. On the other hand Banzai International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 985.27%. Given that Banzai International, Inc. has higher upside potential than MicroVision, Inc., analysts believe Banzai International, Inc. is more attractive than MicroVision, Inc..

MicroVision, Inc. has a beta of 1.357, which suggesting that the stock is 35.716% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Banzai International, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Banzai International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MicroVision, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Banzai International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MicroVision, Inc. quarterly revenues are $241K, which are smaller than Banzai International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $2.8M. MicroVision, Inc.'s net income of -$14.2M is lower than Banzai International, Inc.'s net income of -$5.9M. Notably, MicroVision, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Banzai International, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroVision, Inc. is 66.62x versus 0.91x for Banzai International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ouster, Inc. has a net margin of -5899.17% compared to MicroVision, Inc.'s net margin of -54.99%. MicroVision, Inc.'s return on equity of -131.66% beat Ouster, Inc.'s return on equity of -44.54%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 258.01%. On the other hand Ouster, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $39.50 which suggests that it could grow by 117.39%. Given that MicroVision, Inc. has higher upside potential than Ouster, Inc., analysts believe MicroVision, Inc. is more attractive than Ouster, Inc..

MicroVision, Inc. has a beta of 1.357, which suggesting that the stock is 35.716% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ouster, Inc. has a beta of 2.915, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 191.49%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ouster, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MicroVision, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ouster, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MicroVision, Inc. quarterly revenues are $241K, which are smaller than Ouster, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39.5M. MicroVision, Inc.'s net income of -$14.2M is higher than Ouster, Inc.'s net income of -$21.7M. Notably, MicroVision, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ouster, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroVision, Inc. is 66.62x versus 7.11x for Ouster, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quantum Computing, Inc. has a net margin of -5899.17% compared to MicroVision, Inc.'s net margin of -59806.56%. MicroVision, Inc.'s return on equity of -131.66% beat Quantum Computing, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.49%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 258.01%. On the other hand Quantum Computing, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $18.0000 which suggests that it could grow by 119.78%. Given that MicroVision, Inc. has higher upside potential than Quantum Computing, Inc., analysts believe MicroVision, Inc. is more attractive than Quantum Computing, Inc..

MicroVision, Inc. has a beta of 1.357, which suggesting that the stock is 35.716% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quantum Computing, Inc. has a beta of 3.441, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 244.1%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quantum Computing, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MicroVision, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quantum Computing, Inc. pays out 0.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Quantum Computing, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MicroVision, Inc. quarterly revenues are $241K, which are smaller than Quantum Computing, Inc. quarterly revenues of $384K. MicroVision, Inc.'s net income of -$14.2M is lower than Quantum Computing, Inc.'s net income of $2.4M. Notably, MicroVision, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quantum Computing, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroVision, Inc. is 66.62x versus 2,136.64x for Quantum Computing, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spruce Power Holding Corp. has a net margin of -5899.17% compared to MicroVision, Inc.'s net margin of -2.2%. MicroVision, Inc.'s return on equity of -131.66% beat Spruce Power Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -17.77%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 258.01%. On the other hand Spruce Power Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1097.01%. Given that Spruce Power Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than MicroVision, Inc., analysts believe Spruce Power Holding Corp. is more attractive than MicroVision, Inc..

MicroVision, Inc. has a beta of 1.357, which suggesting that the stock is 35.716% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spruce Power Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.616%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spruce Power Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MicroVision, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spruce Power Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MicroVision, Inc. quarterly revenues are $241K, which are smaller than Spruce Power Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $30.7M. MicroVision, Inc.'s net income of -$14.2M is lower than Spruce Power Holding Corp.'s net income of -$677K. Notably, MicroVision, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spruce Power Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroVision, Inc. is 66.62x versus 0.67x for Spruce Power Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.