MVIS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CoreWeave has a net margin of -5899.17% compared to MicroVision, Inc.'s net margin of --. MicroVision, Inc.'s return on equity of -131.66% beat CoreWeave's return on equity of --.

MicroVision, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 170.86%. On the other hand CoreWeave has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MicroVision, Inc. has higher upside potential than CoreWeave, analysts believe MicroVision, Inc. is more attractive than CoreWeave.

MicroVision, Inc. has a beta of 1.569, which suggesting that the stock is 56.886% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CoreWeave has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CoreWeave offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MicroVision, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CoreWeave pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MicroVision, Inc. quarterly revenues are $241K, which are larger than CoreWeave quarterly revenues of --. MicroVision, Inc.'s net income of -$14.2M is higher than CoreWeave's net income of --. Notably, MicroVision, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CoreWeave's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroVision, Inc. is 88.06x versus -- for CoreWeave. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cisco Systems, Inc. has a net margin of -5899.17% compared to MicroVision, Inc.'s net margin of 19.22%. MicroVision, Inc.'s return on equity of -131.66% beat Cisco Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of 23%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 170.86%. On the other hand Cisco Systems, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $84.81 which suggests that it could grow by 9.07%. Given that MicroVision, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cisco Systems, Inc., analysts believe MicroVision, Inc. is more attractive than Cisco Systems, Inc..

MicroVision, Inc. has a beta of 1.569, which suggesting that the stock is 56.886% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cisco Systems, Inc. has a beta of 0.872, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.781%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cisco Systems, Inc. offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. MicroVision, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cisco Systems, Inc. pays out 63.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Cisco Systems, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MicroVision, Inc. quarterly revenues are $241K, which are smaller than Cisco Systems, Inc. quarterly revenues of $14.9B. MicroVision, Inc.'s net income of -$14.2M is lower than Cisco Systems, Inc.'s net income of $2.9B. Notably, MicroVision, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cisco Systems, Inc.'s PE ratio is 29.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroVision, Inc. is 88.06x versus 5.39x for Cisco Systems, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pagaya Technologies Ltd. has a net margin of -5899.17% compared to MicroVision, Inc.'s net margin of 6.85%. MicroVision, Inc.'s return on equity of -131.66% beat Pagaya Technologies Ltd.'s return on equity of -44.22%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 170.86%. On the other hand Pagaya Technologies Ltd. has an analysts' consensus of $40.80 which suggests that it could grow by 63.99%. Given that MicroVision, Inc. has higher upside potential than Pagaya Technologies Ltd., analysts believe MicroVision, Inc. is more attractive than Pagaya Technologies Ltd..

MicroVision, Inc. has a beta of 1.569, which suggesting that the stock is 56.886% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pagaya Technologies Ltd. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pagaya Technologies Ltd. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MicroVision, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pagaya Technologies Ltd. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MicroVision, Inc. quarterly revenues are $241K, which are smaller than Pagaya Technologies Ltd. quarterly revenues of $339.9M. MicroVision, Inc.'s net income of -$14.2M is lower than Pagaya Technologies Ltd.'s net income of $23.3M. Notably, MicroVision, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pagaya Technologies Ltd.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroVision, Inc. is 88.06x versus 1.65x for Pagaya Technologies Ltd.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spruce Power Holding Corp. has a net margin of -5899.17% compared to MicroVision, Inc.'s net margin of -2.2%. MicroVision, Inc.'s return on equity of -131.66% beat Spruce Power Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -17.77%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 170.86%. On the other hand Spruce Power Holding Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 843.03%. Given that Spruce Power Holding Corp. has higher upside potential than MicroVision, Inc., analysts believe Spruce Power Holding Corp. is more attractive than MicroVision, Inc..

MicroVision, Inc. has a beta of 1.569, which suggesting that the stock is 56.886% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spruce Power Holding Corp. has a beta of 1.427, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.676%.

MicroVision, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spruce Power Holding Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MicroVision, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spruce Power Holding Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MicroVision, Inc. quarterly revenues are $241K, which are smaller than Spruce Power Holding Corp. quarterly revenues of $30.7M. MicroVision, Inc.'s net income of -$14.2M is lower than Spruce Power Holding Corp.'s net income of -$677K. Notably, MicroVision, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spruce Power Holding Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MicroVision, Inc. is 88.06x versus 0.85x for Spruce Power Holding Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.