QUBT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

IonQ, Inc. has a net margin of -59806.56% compared to Quantum Computing, Inc.'s net margin of -2647.9%. Quantum Computing, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.49% beat IonQ, Inc.'s return on equity of -145.26%.

Quantum Computing, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.6667, signalling upside risk potential of 96.08%. On the other hand IonQ, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $72.35 which suggests that it could grow by 48.72%. Given that Quantum Computing, Inc. has higher upside potential than IonQ, Inc., analysts believe Quantum Computing, Inc. is more attractive than IonQ, Inc..

Quantum Computing, Inc. has a beta of 3.803, which suggesting that the stock is 280.341% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IonQ, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Quantum Computing, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IonQ, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum Computing, Inc. pays 0.31% of its earnings as a dividend. IonQ, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quantum Computing, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quantum Computing, Inc. quarterly revenues are $384K, which are smaller than IonQ, Inc. quarterly revenues of $39.9M. Quantum Computing, Inc.'s net income of $2.4M is higher than IonQ, Inc.'s net income of -$1.1B. Notably, Quantum Computing, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IonQ, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing, Inc. is 3,148.87x versus 151.16x for IonQ, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft Corp. has a net margin of -59806.56% compared to Quantum Computing, Inc.'s net margin of 35.72%. Quantum Computing, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.49% beat Microsoft Corp.'s return on equity of 32.4%.

Quantum Computing, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.6667, signalling upside risk potential of 96.08%. On the other hand Microsoft Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $625.41 which suggests that it could grow by 30.91%. Given that Quantum Computing, Inc. has higher upside potential than Microsoft Corp., analysts believe Quantum Computing, Inc. is more attractive than Microsoft Corp..

Quantum Computing, Inc. has a beta of 3.803, which suggesting that the stock is 280.341% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft Corp. has a beta of 1.072, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.205%.

Quantum Computing, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft Corp. offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Quantum Computing, Inc. pays 0.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft Corp. pays out 24.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quantum Computing, Inc. quarterly revenues are $384K, which are smaller than Microsoft Corp. quarterly revenues of $77.7B. Quantum Computing, Inc.'s net income of $2.4M is lower than Microsoft Corp.'s net income of $27.7B. Notably, Quantum Computing, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft Corp.'s PE ratio is 33.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing, Inc. is 3,148.87x versus 12.14x for Microsoft Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA Corp. has a net margin of -59806.56% compared to Quantum Computing, Inc.'s net margin of 55.98%. Quantum Computing, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.49% beat NVIDIA Corp.'s return on equity of 110.69%.

Quantum Computing, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.6667, signalling upside risk potential of 96.08%. On the other hand NVIDIA Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $250.66 which suggests that it could grow by 39.57%. Given that Quantum Computing, Inc. has higher upside potential than NVIDIA Corp., analysts believe Quantum Computing, Inc. is more attractive than NVIDIA Corp..

Quantum Computing, Inc. has a beta of 3.803, which suggesting that the stock is 280.341% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA Corp. has a beta of 2.285, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.544%.

Quantum Computing, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA Corp. offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Quantum Computing, Inc. pays 0.31% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA Corp. pays out 1.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quantum Computing, Inc. quarterly revenues are $384K, which are smaller than NVIDIA Corp. quarterly revenues of $57B. Quantum Computing, Inc.'s net income of $2.4M is lower than NVIDIA Corp.'s net income of $31.9B. Notably, Quantum Computing, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA Corp.'s PE ratio is 44.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing, Inc. is 3,148.87x versus 23.59x for NVIDIA Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rigetti Computing, Inc. has a net margin of -59806.56% compared to Quantum Computing, Inc.'s net margin of -10321.93%. Quantum Computing, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.49% beat Rigetti Computing, Inc.'s return on equity of -127.01%.

Quantum Computing, Inc. has a consensus price target of $23.6667, signalling upside risk potential of 96.08%. On the other hand Rigetti Computing, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $38.50 which suggests that it could grow by 47.85%. Given that Quantum Computing, Inc. has higher upside potential than Rigetti Computing, Inc., analysts believe Quantum Computing, Inc. is more attractive than Rigetti Computing, Inc..

Quantum Computing, Inc. has a beta of 3.803, which suggesting that the stock is 280.341% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rigetti Computing, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Quantum Computing, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rigetti Computing, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Quantum Computing, Inc. pays 0.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Rigetti Computing, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quantum Computing, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quantum Computing, Inc. quarterly revenues are $384K, which are smaller than Rigetti Computing, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Quantum Computing, Inc.'s net income of $2.4M is higher than Rigetti Computing, Inc.'s net income of -$201M. Notably, Quantum Computing, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rigetti Computing, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quantum Computing, Inc. is 3,148.87x versus 1,000.07x for Rigetti Computing, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.