MQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of -22.38% compared to Marqeta's net margin of -11.03%. Marqeta's return on equity of 1.17% beat Castellum's return on equity of -74.03%.

Marqeta has a consensus price target of $5.31, signalling upside risk potential of 37.48%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -31.14%. Given that Marqeta has higher upside potential than Castellum, analysts believe Marqeta is more attractive than Castellum.

Marqeta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -2.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 395.117%.

Marqeta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marqeta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -0.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

Marqeta quarterly revenues are $128M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.6M. Marqeta's net income of -$28.6M is lower than Castellum's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Marqeta's price-to-earnings ratio is 193.00x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marqeta is 4.08x versus 2.00x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a net margin of -22.38% compared to Marqeta's net margin of 3.13%. Marqeta's return on equity of 1.17% beat Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 0.16%.

Marqeta has a consensus price target of $5.31, signalling upside risk potential of 37.48%. On the other hand Clearwater Analytics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $33.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.45%. Given that Marqeta has higher upside potential than Clearwater Analytics Holdings, analysts believe Marqeta is more attractive than Clearwater Analytics Holdings.

Marqeta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Marqeta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marqeta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marqeta quarterly revenues are $128M, which are larger than Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues of $115.8M. Marqeta's net income of -$28.6M is lower than Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Marqeta's price-to-earnings ratio is 193.00x while Clearwater Analytics Holdings's PE ratio is 3,469.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marqeta is 4.08x versus 14.94x for Clearwater Analytics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jack Henry & Associates has a net margin of -22.38% compared to Marqeta's net margin of 19.83%. Marqeta's return on equity of 1.17% beat Jack Henry & Associates's return on equity of 22.36%.

Marqeta has a consensus price target of $5.31, signalling upside risk potential of 37.48%. On the other hand Jack Henry & Associates has an analysts' consensus of $192.93 which suggests that it could grow by 11.07%. Given that Marqeta has higher upside potential than Jack Henry & Associates, analysts believe Marqeta is more attractive than Jack Henry & Associates.

Marqeta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jack Henry & Associates has a beta of 0.611, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.923%.

Marqeta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jack Henry & Associates offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Marqeta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jack Henry & Associates pays out 40.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Jack Henry & Associates's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Marqeta quarterly revenues are $128M, which are smaller than Jack Henry & Associates quarterly revenues of $601M. Marqeta's net income of -$28.6M is lower than Jack Henry & Associates's net income of $119.2M. Notably, Marqeta's price-to-earnings ratio is 193.00x while Jack Henry & Associates's PE ratio is 31.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marqeta is 4.08x versus 5.65x for Jack Henry & Associates. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of -22.38% compared to Marqeta's net margin of 19.78%. Marqeta's return on equity of 1.17% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 12.27%.

Marqeta has a consensus price target of $5.31, signalling upside risk potential of 37.48%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $39.57 which suggests that it could fall by -45.06%. Given that Marqeta has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe Marqeta is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

Marqeta has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Marqeta has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Marqeta pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Marqeta quarterly revenues are $128M, which are smaller than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $725.5M. Marqeta's net income of -$28.6M is lower than Palantir Technologies's net income of $143.5M. Notably, Marqeta's price-to-earnings ratio is 193.00x while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 399.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Marqeta is 4.08x versus 72.62x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.