GDYN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of 4.9% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of -11.03%. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 0.63% beat Castellum's return on equity of -74.03%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $19.75, signalling downside risk potential of -2.69%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -4.17%. Given that Castellum has more downside risk than Grid Dynamics Holdings, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than Castellum.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.95000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -2.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 395.117%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -0.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $87.4M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.6M. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $4.3M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 719.33x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 5.05x versus 1.43x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement has a net margin of 4.9% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of 4.19%. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 0.63% beat Exodus Movement's return on equity of 23.63%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $19.75, signalling downside risk potential of -2.69%. On the other hand Exodus Movement has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than Exodus Movement, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than Exodus Movement.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.95000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $87.4M, which are larger than Exodus Movement quarterly revenues of $20.1M. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $4.3M is higher than Exodus Movement's net income of $843K. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 719.33x while Exodus Movement's PE ratio is 28.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 5.05x versus 13.60x for Exodus Movement. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marti Technologies has a net margin of 4.9% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of --. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 0.63% beat Marti Technologies's return on equity of --.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $19.75, signalling downside risk potential of -2.69%. On the other hand Marti Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -12.79%. Given that Marti Technologies has more downside risk than Grid Dynamics Holdings, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than Marti Technologies.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.95000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marti Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marti Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marti Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $87.4M, which are larger than Marti Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $4.3M is higher than Marti Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 719.33x while Marti Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 5.05x versus 10.23x for Marti Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VeriSign has a net margin of 4.9% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of 51.54%. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 0.63% beat VeriSign's return on equity of --.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $19.75, signalling downside risk potential of -2.69%. On the other hand VeriSign has an analysts' consensus of $219.78 which suggests that it could grow by 5.05%. Given that VeriSign has higher upside potential than Grid Dynamics Holdings, analysts believe VeriSign is more attractive than Grid Dynamics Holdings.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.95000000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VeriSign has a beta of 0.887, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.3%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. VeriSign offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VeriSign pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $87.4M, which are smaller than VeriSign quarterly revenues of $390.6M. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $4.3M is lower than VeriSign's net income of $201.3M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 719.33x while VeriSign's PE ratio is 24.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 5.05x versus 13.54x for VeriSign. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.