GDYN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of 2.9% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of -26.62%. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 2.47% beat Castellum's return on equity of -71.22%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 30.82%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of $3.00 which suggests that it could grow by 204.85%. Given that Castellum has higher upside potential than Grid Dynamics Holdings, analysts believe Castellum is more attractive than Grid Dynamics Holdings.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.127, which suggesting that the stock is 12.695% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -3.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 498.483%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -1.2% of its earnings as a dividend.

Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.4M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $2.9M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$2.7M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 116.25x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 3.14x versus 1.24x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diebold Nixdorf has a net margin of 2.9% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of -0.99%. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 2.47% beat Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of -1.01%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 30.82%. On the other hand Diebold Nixdorf has an analysts' consensus of $72.33 which suggests that it could grow by 56.4%. Given that Diebold Nixdorf has higher upside potential than Grid Dynamics Holdings, analysts believe Diebold Nixdorf is more attractive than Grid Dynamics Holdings.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.127, which suggesting that the stock is 12.695% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diebold Nixdorf offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diebold Nixdorf pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.4M, which are smaller than Diebold Nixdorf quarterly revenues of $841.1M. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $2.9M is higher than Diebold Nixdorf's net income of -$8.3M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 116.25x while Diebold Nixdorf's PE ratio is 356.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 3.14x versus 0.47x for Diebold Nixdorf. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EPAM Systems has a net margin of 2.9% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of 5.65%. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 2.47% beat EPAM Systems's return on equity of 11.63%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 30.82%. On the other hand EPAM Systems has an analysts' consensus of $217.64 which suggests that it could grow by 22.89%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than EPAM Systems, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than EPAM Systems.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.127, which suggesting that the stock is 12.695% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.706, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.57%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EPAM Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EPAM Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.4M, which are smaller than EPAM Systems quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $2.9M is lower than EPAM Systems's net income of $73.5M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 116.25x while EPAM Systems's PE ratio is 24.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 3.14x versus 2.10x for EPAM Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

International Business Machines has a net margin of 2.9% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings's net margin of 7.26%. Grid Dynamics Holdings's return on equity of 2.47% beat International Business Machines's return on equity of 21.67%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a consensus price target of $18.25, signalling upside risk potential of 30.82%. On the other hand International Business Machines has an analysts' consensus of $251.82 which suggests that it could grow by 1.05%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings has higher upside potential than International Business Machines, analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings is more attractive than International Business Machines.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a beta of 1.127, which suggesting that the stock is 12.695% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison International Business Machines has a beta of 0.645, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.494%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. International Business Machines offers a yield of 2.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.68 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. International Business Machines pays out 102.06% of its earnings as a dividend.

Grid Dynamics Holdings quarterly revenues are $100.4M, which are smaller than International Business Machines quarterly revenues of $14.5B. Grid Dynamics Holdings's net income of $2.9M is lower than International Business Machines's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 116.25x while International Business Machines's PE ratio is 42.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings is 3.14x versus 3.71x for International Business Machines. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.