GDYN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. has a net margin of 1.13% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 5.06%. Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.77% beat Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.'s return on equity of 14.39%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.44%. On the other hand Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $86.12 which suggests that it could grow by 1.11%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp., analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp..

Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. has a beta of 0.970, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.007%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. offers a yield of 1.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. pays out 26.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $104.2M, which are smaller than Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp. quarterly revenues of $5.4B. Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $1.2M is lower than Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.'s net income of $274M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.83x while Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.'s PE ratio is 19.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. is 1.95x versus 2.01x for Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exodus Movement, Inc. has a net margin of 1.13% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 56.16%. Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.77% beat Exodus Movement, Inc.'s return on equity of 43.02%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.44%. On the other hand Exodus Movement, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $37.67 which suggests that it could grow by 138.55%. Given that Exodus Movement, Inc. has higher upside potential than Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Exodus Movement, Inc. is more attractive than Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc..

Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exodus Movement, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Exodus Movement, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Exodus Movement, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $104.2M, which are larger than Exodus Movement, Inc. quarterly revenues of $30.3M. Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $1.2M is lower than Exodus Movement, Inc.'s net income of $17M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.83x while Exodus Movement, Inc.'s PE ratio is 4.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. is 1.95x versus 3.47x for Exodus Movement, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of 1.13% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 1.83%. Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.77% beat Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 31.84%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.44%. On the other hand Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $37.60 which suggests that it could grow by 38.59%. Given that Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc..

Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $104.2M, which are smaller than Kyndryl Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $1.2M is lower than Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $68M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.83x while Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. is 1.95x versus 0.43x for Kyndryl Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies, Inc. has a net margin of 1.13% compared to Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.'s net margin of 40.37%. Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.77% beat Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s return on equity of 19.7%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.44%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $184.65 which suggests that it could fall by -4.88%. Given that Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, Inc., analysts believe Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than Palantir Technologies, Inc..

Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.851, which suggesting that the stock is 14.928% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies, Inc. has a beta of 1.495, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.467%.

Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues are $104.2M, which are smaller than Palantir Technologies, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $1.2M is lower than Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s net income of $476.7M. Notably, Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 56.83x while Palantir Technologies, Inc.'s PE ratio is 454.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Grid Dynamics Holdings, Inc. is 1.95x versus 127.24x for Palantir Technologies, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.