MLKN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hooker Furnishings Corp. has a net margin of 2.64% compared to MillerKnoll, Inc.'s net margin of -17.77%. MillerKnoll, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.6% beat Hooker Furnishings Corp.'s return on equity of -10.94%.

MillerKnoll, Inc. has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 59.36%. On the other hand Hooker Furnishings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.04%. Given that MillerKnoll, Inc. has higher upside potential than Hooker Furnishings Corp., analysts believe MillerKnoll, Inc. is more attractive than Hooker Furnishings Corp..

MillerKnoll, Inc. has a beta of 1.323, which suggesting that the stock is 32.277% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hooker Furnishings Corp. has a beta of 1.392, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.231%.

MillerKnoll, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Hooker Furnishings Corp. offers a yield of 6.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. MillerKnoll, Inc. pays 155.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Hooker Furnishings Corp. pays out 77.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Hooker Furnishings Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MillerKnoll, Inc.'s is not.

MillerKnoll, Inc. quarterly revenues are $955.2M, which are larger than Hooker Furnishings Corp. quarterly revenues of $70.7M. MillerKnoll, Inc.'s net income of $25.2M is higher than Hooker Furnishings Corp.'s net income of -$12.6M. Notably, MillerKnoll, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.95x while Hooker Furnishings Corp.'s PE ratio is 121.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MillerKnoll, Inc. is 0.37x versus 0.41x for Hooker Furnishings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a net margin of 2.64% compared to MillerKnoll, Inc.'s net margin of -1757.18%. MillerKnoll, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.6% beat Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s return on equity of -25.4%.

MillerKnoll, Inc. has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 59.36%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 143.9%. Given that Hyliion Holdings Corp. has higher upside potential than MillerKnoll, Inc., analysts believe Hyliion Holdings Corp. is more attractive than MillerKnoll, Inc..

MillerKnoll, Inc. has a beta of 1.323, which suggesting that the stock is 32.277% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings Corp. has a beta of 2.553, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 155.306%.

MillerKnoll, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Hyliion Holdings Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MillerKnoll, Inc. pays 155.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MillerKnoll, Inc. quarterly revenues are $955.2M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings Corp. quarterly revenues of $759K. MillerKnoll, Inc.'s net income of $25.2M is higher than Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s net income of -$13.3M. Notably, MillerKnoll, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.95x while Hyliion Holdings Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MillerKnoll, Inc. is 0.37x versus 83.87x for Hyliion Holdings Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

La-Z-Boy, Inc. has a net margin of 2.64% compared to MillerKnoll, Inc.'s net margin of 5.55%. MillerKnoll, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.6% beat La-Z-Boy, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.87%.

MillerKnoll, Inc. has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 59.36%. On the other hand La-Z-Boy, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $42.50 which suggests that it could grow by 16.73%. Given that MillerKnoll, Inc. has higher upside potential than La-Z-Boy, Inc., analysts believe MillerKnoll, Inc. is more attractive than La-Z-Boy, Inc..

MillerKnoll, Inc. has a beta of 1.323, which suggesting that the stock is 32.277% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison La-Z-Boy, Inc. has a beta of 1.271, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.062%.

MillerKnoll, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. La-Z-Boy, Inc. offers a yield of 2.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. MillerKnoll, Inc. pays 155.72% of its earnings as a dividend. La-Z-Boy, Inc. pays out 35.73% of its earnings as a dividend. La-Z-Boy, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MillerKnoll, Inc.'s is not.

MillerKnoll, Inc. quarterly revenues are $955.2M, which are larger than La-Z-Boy, Inc. quarterly revenues of $522.5M. MillerKnoll, Inc.'s net income of $25.2M is lower than La-Z-Boy, Inc.'s net income of $29M. Notably, MillerKnoll, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.95x while La-Z-Boy, Inc.'s PE ratio is 16.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MillerKnoll, Inc. is 0.37x versus 0.72x for La-Z-Boy, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Winnebago Industries, Inc. has a net margin of 2.64% compared to MillerKnoll, Inc.'s net margin of 0.78%. MillerKnoll, Inc.'s return on equity of -1.6% beat Winnebago Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 2.97%.

MillerKnoll, Inc. has a consensus price target of $32.00, signalling upside risk potential of 59.36%. On the other hand Winnebago Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $49.33 which suggests that it could grow by 5.75%. Given that MillerKnoll, Inc. has higher upside potential than Winnebago Industries, Inc., analysts believe MillerKnoll, Inc. is more attractive than Winnebago Industries, Inc..

MillerKnoll, Inc. has a beta of 1.323, which suggesting that the stock is 32.277% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winnebago Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.388%.

MillerKnoll, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.74%. Winnebago Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. MillerKnoll, Inc. pays 155.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Winnebago Industries, Inc. pays out 149.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MillerKnoll, Inc. quarterly revenues are $955.2M, which are larger than Winnebago Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $702.7M. MillerKnoll, Inc.'s net income of $25.2M is higher than Winnebago Industries, Inc.'s net income of $5.5M. Notably, MillerKnoll, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 41.95x while Winnebago Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MillerKnoll, Inc. is 0.37x versus 0.46x for Winnebago Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.