MLKN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Document Security Systems has a net margin of 3.51% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of --. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 4.46% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

MillerKnoll has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.58%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MillerKnoll has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe MillerKnoll is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.225, which suggesting that the stock is 22.502% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MillerKnoll has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MillerKnoll pays 67.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MillerKnoll quarterly revenues are $970.4M, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. MillerKnoll's net income of $34.1M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, MillerKnoll's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.78x while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MillerKnoll is 0.38x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Myers Industries has a net margin of 3.51% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of 2.11%. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 4.46% beat Myers Industries's return on equity of 2.51%.

MillerKnoll has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.58%. On the other hand Myers Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 75.02%. Given that Myers Industries has higher upside potential than MillerKnoll, analysts believe Myers Industries is more attractive than MillerKnoll.

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.225, which suggesting that the stock is 22.502% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Myers Industries has a beta of 1.208, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.824%.

MillerKnoll has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. Myers Industries offers a yield of 4.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. MillerKnoll pays 67.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Myers Industries pays out 283.74% of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Myers Industries's is not.

MillerKnoll quarterly revenues are $970.4M, which are larger than Myers Industries quarterly revenues of $203.9M. MillerKnoll's net income of $34.1M is higher than Myers Industries's net income of $4.3M. Notably, MillerKnoll's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.78x while Myers Industries's PE ratio is 66.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MillerKnoll is 0.38x versus 0.56x for Myers Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

O-I Glass has a net margin of 3.51% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of -10.07%. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 4.46% beat O-I Glass's return on equity of -6.66%.

MillerKnoll has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.58%. On the other hand O-I Glass has an analysts' consensus of $15.60 which suggests that it could grow by 39.54%. Given that MillerKnoll has higher upside potential than O-I Glass, analysts believe MillerKnoll is more attractive than O-I Glass.

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.225, which suggesting that the stock is 22.502% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison O-I Glass has a beta of 1.203, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.339%.

MillerKnoll has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. O-I Glass offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MillerKnoll pays 67.56% of its earnings as a dividend. O-I Glass pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MillerKnoll quarterly revenues are $970.4M, which are smaller than O-I Glass quarterly revenues of $1.5B. MillerKnoll's net income of $34.1M is higher than O-I Glass's net income of -$154M. Notably, MillerKnoll's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.78x while O-I Glass's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MillerKnoll is 0.38x versus 0.27x for O-I Glass. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yunhong Green CTI has a net margin of 3.51% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of -46.97%. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 4.46% beat Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74%.

MillerKnoll has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 66.58%. On the other hand Yunhong Green CTI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 723.53%. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than MillerKnoll, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than MillerKnoll.

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.225, which suggesting that the stock is 22.502% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.66999999999999%.

MillerKnoll has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.97%. Yunhong Green CTI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MillerKnoll pays 67.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Yunhong Green CTI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MillerKnoll's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MillerKnoll quarterly revenues are $970.4M, which are larger than Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues of $2.5M. MillerKnoll's net income of $34.1M is higher than Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, MillerKnoll's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.78x while Yunhong Green CTI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MillerKnoll is 0.38x versus 1.01x for Yunhong Green CTI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.