MKZR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has a net margin of -67.87% compared to MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.'s net margin of 4.06%. MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.35% beat Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s return on equity of 26.79%.

MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -44.16%. Given that Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has higher upside potential than MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc., analysts believe Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. is more attractive than MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc..

MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. has a beta of -0.015, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.466%.

MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 62.5%. Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. pays -50.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.5M, which are smaller than Comstock Holding Cos., Inc. quarterly revenues of $13.3M. MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.'s net income of -$3M is lower than Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s net income of $541K. Notably, MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. is 1.33x versus 2.31x for Comstock Holding Cos., Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

eXp World Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -67.87% compared to MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.'s net margin of 0.27%. MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.35% beat eXp World Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -8.35%.

MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand eXp World Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 30.39%. Given that eXp World Holdings, Inc. has higher upside potential than MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc., analysts believe eXp World Holdings, Inc. is more attractive than MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc..

MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eXp World Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 1.978, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.833%.

MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 62.5%. eXp World Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 2.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. pays -50.33% of its earnings as a dividend. eXp World Holdings, Inc. pays out 179.29% of its earnings as a dividend.

MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.5M, which are smaller than eXp World Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.3B. MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.'s net income of -$3M is lower than eXp World Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $3.5M. Notably, MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while eXp World Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. is 1.33x versus 0.33x for eXp World Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FRP Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -67.87% compared to MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.'s net margin of 5.24%. MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.35% beat FRP Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 0.97%.

MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FRP Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, Inc., analysts believe MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. is more attractive than FRP Holdings, Inc..

MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FRP Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 0.562, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.827%.

MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 62.5%. FRP Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. pays -50.33% of its earnings as a dividend. FRP Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.5M, which are smaller than FRP Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.8M. MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.'s net income of -$3M is lower than FRP Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $565K. Notably, MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FRP Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 94.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. is 1.33x versus 10.29x for FRP Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Development Corp. has a net margin of -67.87% compared to MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.'s net margin of -123.74%. MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.'s return on equity of -20.35% beat Safe & Green Development Corp.'s return on equity of -826.7%.

MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Safe & Green Development Corp. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development Corp., analysts believe MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. is more attractive than Safe & Green Development Corp..

MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Development Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 62.5%. Safe & Green Development Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. pays -50.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Development Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. quarterly revenues are $4.5M, which are larger than Safe & Green Development Corp. quarterly revenues of $3.5M. MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.'s net income of -$3M is higher than Safe & Green Development Corp.'s net income of -$4.4M. Notably, MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Safe & Green Development Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. is 1.33x versus 0.13x for Safe & Green Development Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.