MKTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of 7.22% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of 26.13%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 16% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity of 13.75%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $236.17, signalling upside risk potential of 2.2%. On the other hand Morgan Stanley has an analysts' consensus of $124.13 which suggests that it could grow by 1.99%. Given that MarketAxess Holdings has higher upside potential than Morgan Stanley, analysts believe MarketAxess Holdings is more attractive than Morgan Stanley.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 0.892, which suggesting that the stock is 10.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.300, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.001%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.29%. Morgan Stanley offers a yield of 3.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.93 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Morgan Stanley pays out 45.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $208.6M, which are smaller than Morgan Stanley quarterly revenues of $16.5B. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $15.1M is lower than Morgan Stanley's net income of $4.3B. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.19x while Morgan Stanley's PE ratio is 14.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.65x versus 3.26x for Morgan Stanley. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riot Platforms has a net margin of 7.22% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of -183.64%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 16% beat Riot Platforms's return on equity of -14.35%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $236.17, signalling upside risk potential of 2.2%. On the other hand Riot Platforms has an analysts' consensus of $15.40 which suggests that it could grow by 81.6%. Given that Riot Platforms has higher upside potential than MarketAxess Holdings, analysts believe Riot Platforms is more attractive than MarketAxess Holdings.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 0.892, which suggesting that the stock is 10.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riot Platforms has a beta of 4.747, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 374.659%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.29%. Riot Platforms offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Riot Platforms pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $208.6M, which are larger than Riot Platforms quarterly revenues of $161.4M. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $15.1M is higher than Riot Platforms's net income of -$296.4M. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.19x while Riot Platforms's PE ratio is 24.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.65x versus 5.66x for Riot Platforms. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 7.22% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of 34.1%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 16% beat Charles Schwab's return on equity of 13.33%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $236.17, signalling upside risk potential of 2.2%. On the other hand Charles Schwab has an analysts' consensus of $89.10 which suggests that it could grow by 5.48%. Given that Charles Schwab has higher upside potential than MarketAxess Holdings, analysts believe Charles Schwab is more attractive than MarketAxess Holdings.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 0.892, which suggesting that the stock is 10.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.903, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.659%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.29%. Charles Schwab offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 38.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $208.6M, which are smaller than Charles Schwab quarterly revenues of $5.6B. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $15.1M is lower than Charles Schwab's net income of $1.9B. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.19x while Charles Schwab's PE ratio is 25.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.65x versus 7.56x for Charles Schwab. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Virtu Financial has a net margin of 7.22% compared to MarketAxess Holdings's net margin of 11.9%. MarketAxess Holdings's return on equity of 16% beat Virtu Financial's return on equity of 21.87%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a consensus price target of $236.17, signalling upside risk potential of 2.2%. On the other hand Virtu Financial has an analysts' consensus of $41.67 which suggests that it could fall by -3.44%. Given that MarketAxess Holdings has higher upside potential than Virtu Financial, analysts believe MarketAxess Holdings is more attractive than Virtu Financial.

MarketAxess Holdings has a beta of 0.892, which suggesting that the stock is 10.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Virtu Financial has a beta of 0.685, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.463%.

MarketAxess Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.29%. Virtu Financial offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. MarketAxess Holdings pays 41.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Virtu Financial pays out 108.32% of its earnings as a dividend. MarketAxess Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Virtu Financial's is not.

MarketAxess Holdings quarterly revenues are $208.6M, which are smaller than Virtu Financial quarterly revenues of $837.9M. MarketAxess Holdings's net income of $15.1M is lower than Virtu Financial's net income of $99.7M. Notably, MarketAxess Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.19x while Virtu Financial's PE ratio is 12.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MarketAxess Holdings is 10.65x versus 1.22x for Virtu Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.