MERC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a net margin of -68.68% compared to Mercer International, Inc.'s net margin of --. Mercer International, Inc.'s return on equity of -142.97% beat Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s return on equity of --.

Mercer International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.81, signalling upside risk potential of 28.55%. On the other hand Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mercer International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Biomass Secure Power, Inc., analysts believe Mercer International, Inc. is more attractive than Biomass Secure Power, Inc..

Mercer International, Inc. has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.873% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Biomass Secure Power, Inc. has a beta of -5.730, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 673.003%.

Mercer International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.97%. Biomass Secure Power, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mercer International, Inc. pays 23.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Biomass Secure Power, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercer International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercer International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $449.5M, which are larger than Biomass Secure Power, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Mercer International, Inc.'s net income of -$308.7M is higher than Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s net income of --. Notably, Mercer International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Biomass Secure Power, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercer International, Inc. is 0.05x versus -- for Biomass Secure Power, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a net margin of -68.68% compared to Mercer International, Inc.'s net margin of --. Mercer International, Inc.'s return on equity of -142.97% beat Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of 9491.01%.

Mercer International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.81, signalling upside risk potential of 28.55%. On the other hand Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mercer International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc., analysts believe Mercer International, Inc. is more attractive than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc..

Mercer International, Inc. has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.873% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. has a beta of 8.776, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 777.55%.

Mercer International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.97%. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mercer International, Inc. pays 23.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercer International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercer International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $449.5M, which are larger than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc. quarterly revenues of $20.3K. Mercer International, Inc.'s net income of -$308.7M is lower than Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s net income of $21.2M. Notably, Mercer International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.'s PE ratio is 0.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercer International, Inc. is 0.05x versus 454.72x for Chykingyoung Investment Development Holdings, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a net margin of -68.68% compared to Mercer International, Inc.'s net margin of 3.66%. Mercer International, Inc.'s return on equity of -142.97% beat Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.96%.

Mercer International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.81, signalling upside risk potential of 28.55%. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.0000 which suggests that it could grow by 106.77%. Given that Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mercer International, Inc., analysts believe Flexible Solutions International, Inc. is more attractive than Mercer International, Inc..

Mercer International, Inc. has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.873% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a beta of 1.594, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.414%.

Mercer International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.97%. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. offers a yield of 3.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Mercer International, Inc. pays 23.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercer International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercer International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $449.5M, which are larger than Flexible Solutions International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.6M. Mercer International, Inc.'s net income of -$308.7M is lower than Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s net income of $386.7K. Notably, Mercer International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 36.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercer International, Inc. is 0.05x versus 1.74x for Flexible Solutions International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Loop Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -68.68% compared to Mercer International, Inc.'s net margin of -3423.26%. Mercer International, Inc.'s return on equity of -142.97% beat Loop Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -1369.4%.

Mercer International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $1.81, signalling upside risk potential of 28.55%. On the other hand Loop Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.55 which suggests that it could grow by 205.37%. Given that Loop Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mercer International, Inc., analysts believe Loop Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Mercer International, Inc..

Mercer International, Inc. has a beta of 0.771, which suggesting that the stock is 22.873% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loop Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.596, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.568%.

Mercer International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.97%. Loop Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mercer International, Inc. pays 23.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Loop Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercer International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercer International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $449.5M, which are larger than Loop Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of $86K. Mercer International, Inc.'s net income of -$308.7M is lower than Loop Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$2.9M. Notably, Mercer International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Loop Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercer International, Inc. is 0.05x versus 6.39x for Loop Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.