MERC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a net margin of -17.64% compared to Mercer International, Inc.'s net margin of 3.66%. Mercer International, Inc.'s return on equity of -39.38% beat Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s return on equity of 7.96%.

Mercer International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.31, signalling upside risk potential of 7.42%. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $11.0000 which suggests that it could grow by 61.05%. Given that Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mercer International, Inc., analysts believe Flexible Solutions International, Inc. is more attractive than Mercer International, Inc..

Mercer International, Inc. has a beta of 0.760, which suggesting that the stock is 24.008% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International, Inc. has a beta of 1.545, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.501%.

Mercer International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.63%. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Mercer International, Inc. pays 23.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercer International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercer International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $458.1M, which are larger than Flexible Solutions International, Inc. quarterly revenues of $10.6M. Mercer International, Inc.'s net income of -$80.8M is lower than Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s net income of $386.7K. Notably, Mercer International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flexible Solutions International, Inc.'s PE ratio is 47.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercer International, Inc. is 0.07x versus 2.26x for Flexible Solutions International, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brazil Potash Corp has a net margin of -17.64% compared to Mercer International, Inc.'s net margin of --. Mercer International, Inc.'s return on equity of -39.38% beat Brazil Potash Corp's return on equity of --.

Mercer International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.31, signalling upside risk potential of 7.42%. On the other hand Brazil Potash Corp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mercer International, Inc. has higher upside potential than Brazil Potash Corp, analysts believe Mercer International, Inc. is more attractive than Brazil Potash Corp.

Mercer International, Inc. has a beta of 0.760, which suggesting that the stock is 24.008% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brazil Potash Corp has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mercer International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.63%. Brazil Potash Corp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mercer International, Inc. pays 23.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Brazil Potash Corp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercer International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercer International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $458.1M, which are larger than Brazil Potash Corp quarterly revenues of --. Mercer International, Inc.'s net income of -$80.8M is higher than Brazil Potash Corp's net income of --. Notably, Mercer International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Brazil Potash Corp's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercer International, Inc. is 0.07x versus -- for Brazil Potash Corp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Royalty Corp. has a net margin of -17.64% compared to Mercer International, Inc.'s net margin of -27.31%. Mercer International, Inc.'s return on equity of -39.38% beat Gold Royalty Corp.'s return on equity of -1.15%.

Mercer International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.31, signalling upside risk potential of 7.42%. On the other hand Gold Royalty Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $4.79 which suggests that it could grow by 15.04%. Given that Gold Royalty Corp. has higher upside potential than Mercer International, Inc., analysts believe Gold Royalty Corp. is more attractive than Mercer International, Inc..

Mercer International, Inc. has a beta of 0.760, which suggesting that the stock is 24.008% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Royalty Corp. has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mercer International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.63%. Gold Royalty Corp. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Mercer International, Inc. pays 23.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Royalty Corp. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercer International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercer International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $458.1M, which are larger than Gold Royalty Corp. quarterly revenues of $4.1M. Mercer International, Inc.'s net income of -$80.8M is lower than Gold Royalty Corp.'s net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Mercer International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Royalty Corp.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercer International, Inc. is 0.07x versus 49.04x for Gold Royalty Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Loop Industries, Inc. has a net margin of -17.64% compared to Mercer International, Inc.'s net margin of -1367.86%. Mercer International, Inc.'s return on equity of -39.38% beat Loop Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of -1369.4%.

Mercer International, Inc. has a consensus price target of $2.31, signalling upside risk potential of 7.42%. On the other hand Loop Industries, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $4.55 which suggests that it could grow by 325.23%. Given that Loop Industries, Inc. has higher upside potential than Mercer International, Inc., analysts believe Loop Industries, Inc. is more attractive than Mercer International, Inc..

Mercer International, Inc. has a beta of 0.760, which suggesting that the stock is 24.008% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Loop Industries, Inc. has a beta of 1.591, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.14%.

Mercer International, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 15.63%. Loop Industries, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mercer International, Inc. pays 23.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Loop Industries, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mercer International, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercer International, Inc. quarterly revenues are $458.1M, which are larger than Loop Industries, Inc. quarterly revenues of --. Mercer International, Inc.'s net income of -$80.8M is lower than Loop Industries, Inc.'s net income of -$3.2M. Notably, Mercer International, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Loop Industries, Inc.'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercer International, Inc. is 0.07x versus 4.59x for Loop Industries, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.