Will The Magnificent 7 Stocks Go Up This Year?
2025 was another banner year for the Magnificent Seven stocks,…
Buy
76
LQDT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$31.29
Seasonality move
:
-1.21%
Day range:
$30.75 - $31.52
52-week range:
$21.67 - $39.72
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
36.09x
P/S ratio:
2.13x
P/B ratio:
4.72x
Volume:
107.1K
Avg. volume:
167.7K
1-year change:
-7.93%
Market cap:
$959M
Revenue:
$476.7M
EPS (TTM):
$0.87
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
|
$100.9M | $0.31 | -15.84% | 69.07% | $41.00 |
|
BBWI
Bath & Body Works, Inc.
|
$1.6B | $0.40 | -7.57% | -17.25% | $23.62 |
|
BDL
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
DSS
Document Security Systems
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCVL
Shoe Carnival, Inc.
|
$297.2M | $0.53 | -2.36% | -42.95% | $19.00 |
|
TILE
Interface, Inc.
|
$349.6M | $0.40 | 4.37% | 8.26% | $33.33 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
|
$31.30 | $41.00 | $959M | 36.09x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.13x |
|
BBWI
Bath & Body Works, Inc.
|
$23.29 | $23.62 | $4.8B | 7.16x | $0.20 | 3.44% | 0.67x |
|
BDL
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.
|
$31.75 | -- | $59M | 11.73x | $0.55 | 1.73% | 0.29x |
|
DSS
Document Security Systems
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
SCVL
Shoe Carnival, Inc.
|
$19.13 | $19.00 | $523.7M | 9.10x | $0.15 | 3.06% | 0.46x |
|
TILE
Interface, Inc.
|
$30.06 | $33.33 | $1.8B | 15.68x | $0.02 | 0.2% | 1.30x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
|
6.5% | -0.790 | 1.68% | 1.23x |
|
BBWI
Bath & Body Works, Inc.
|
147.03% | 0.782 | 98.64% | 0.26x |
|
BDL
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.
|
41.97% | 1.742 | 64.37% | 1.11x |
|
DSS
Document Security Systems
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
SCVL
Shoe Carnival, Inc.
|
34.69% | 1.099 | 72.31% | 0.81x |
|
TILE
Interface, Inc.
|
39.08% | 1.205 | 23.57% | 1.56x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
|
$53.8M | $10.9M | 13.35% | 14.33% | 9.27% | $36M |
|
BBWI
Bath & Body Works, Inc.
|
$658M | $161M | 19.92% | -- | 10.1% | -$1M |
|
BDL
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.
|
$8.8M | $656K | 6.37% | 10.38% | 1.33% | $2.2M |
|
DSS
Document Security Systems
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SCVL
Shoe Carnival, Inc.
|
$111.8M | $18.6M | 5.65% | 8.79% | 6.27% | $19.7M |
|
TILE
Interface, Inc.
|
$143.6M | $53.4M | 12.03% | 21% | 14.64% | $66.1M |
Liquidity Services, Inc. vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns LQDT or BBWI?
Bath & Body Works, Inc. has a net margin of 6.62% compared to Liquidity Services, Inc.'s net margin of 4.83%. Liquidity Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.33% beat Bath & Body Works, Inc.'s return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQDTLiquidity Services, Inc.45.55% $0.24 $217.4M BBWIBath & Body Works, Inc.41.28% $0.37 $3.4B -
What do Analysts Say About LQDT or BBWI?
Liquidity Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.99%. On the other hand Bath & Body Works, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $23.62 which suggests that it could grow by 1.4%. Given that Liquidity Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Bath & Body Works, Inc., analysts believe Liquidity Services, Inc. is more attractive than Bath & Body Works, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQDTLiquidity Services, Inc.1 0 0 BBWIBath & Body Works, Inc.5 11 0 -
Is LQDT or BBWI More Risky?
Liquidity Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.987, which suggesting that the stock is 1.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bath & Body Works, Inc. has a beta of 1.514, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.42%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQDT or BBWI?
Liquidity Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bath & Body Works, Inc. offers a yield of 3.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Liquidity Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bath & Body Works, Inc. pays out 22.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Bath & Body Works, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQDT or BBWI?
Liquidity Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $118.1M, which are smaller than Bath & Body Works, Inc. quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Liquidity Services, Inc.'s net income of $7.8M is lower than Bath & Body Works, Inc.'s net income of $77M. Notably, Liquidity Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.09x while Bath & Body Works, Inc.'s PE ratio is 7.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidity Services, Inc. is 2.13x versus 0.67x for Bath & Body Works, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQDTLiquidity Services, Inc.2.13x 36.09x $118.1M $7.8M BBWIBath & Body Works, Inc.0.67x 7.16x $1.6B $77M
-
Which has Higher Returns LQDT or BDL?
Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. has a net margin of 6.62% compared to Liquidity Services, Inc.'s net margin of 3.15%. Liquidity Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.33% beat Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s return on equity of 10.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQDTLiquidity Services, Inc.45.55% $0.24 $217.4M BDLFlanigan's Enterprises, Inc.17.94% $0.48 $126.2M -
What do Analysts Say About LQDT or BDL?
Liquidity Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.99%. On the other hand Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Liquidity Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc., analysts believe Liquidity Services, Inc. is more attractive than Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQDTLiquidity Services, Inc.1 0 0 BDLFlanigan's Enterprises, Inc.0 0 0 -
Is LQDT or BDL More Risky?
Liquidity Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.987, which suggesting that the stock is 1.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. has a beta of 0.264, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.635%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQDT or BDL?
Liquidity Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Liquidity Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. pays out 20.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQDT or BDL?
Liquidity Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $118.1M, which are larger than Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc. quarterly revenues of $49.2M. Liquidity Services, Inc.'s net income of $7.8M is higher than Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s net income of $1.6M. Notably, Liquidity Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.09x while Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidity Services, Inc. is 2.13x versus 0.29x for Flanigan's Enterprises, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQDTLiquidity Services, Inc.2.13x 36.09x $118.1M $7.8M BDLFlanigan's Enterprises, Inc.0.29x 11.73x $49.2M $1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns LQDT or DSS?
Document Security Systems has a net margin of 6.62% compared to Liquidity Services, Inc.'s net margin of --. Liquidity Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.33% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQDTLiquidity Services, Inc.45.55% $0.24 $217.4M DSSDocument Security Systems-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About LQDT or DSS?
Liquidity Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.99%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Liquidity Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Liquidity Services, Inc. is more attractive than Document Security Systems.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQDTLiquidity Services, Inc.1 0 0 DSSDocument Security Systems0 0 0 -
Is LQDT or DSS More Risky?
Liquidity Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.987, which suggesting that the stock is 1.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQDT or DSS?
Liquidity Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Liquidity Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQDT or DSS?
Liquidity Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $118.1M, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Liquidity Services, Inc.'s net income of $7.8M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Liquidity Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.09x while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidity Services, Inc. is 2.13x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQDTLiquidity Services, Inc.2.13x 36.09x $118.1M $7.8M DSSDocument Security Systems-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns LQDT or SCVL?
Shoe Carnival, Inc. has a net margin of 6.62% compared to Liquidity Services, Inc.'s net margin of 4.93%. Liquidity Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.33% beat Shoe Carnival, Inc.'s return on equity of 8.79%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQDTLiquidity Services, Inc.45.55% $0.24 $217.4M SCVLShoe Carnival, Inc.37.64% $0.53 $1B -
What do Analysts Say About LQDT or SCVL?
Liquidity Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.99%. On the other hand Shoe Carnival, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $19.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.68%. Given that Liquidity Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Shoe Carnival, Inc., analysts believe Liquidity Services, Inc. is more attractive than Shoe Carnival, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQDTLiquidity Services, Inc.1 0 0 SCVLShoe Carnival, Inc.0 3 0 -
Is LQDT or SCVL More Risky?
Liquidity Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.987, which suggesting that the stock is 1.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shoe Carnival, Inc. has a beta of 1.311, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.149%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQDT or SCVL?
Liquidity Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Shoe Carnival, Inc. offers a yield of 3.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Liquidity Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Shoe Carnival, Inc. pays out 20.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Shoe Carnival, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQDT or SCVL?
Liquidity Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $118.1M, which are smaller than Shoe Carnival, Inc. quarterly revenues of $297.2M. Liquidity Services, Inc.'s net income of $7.8M is lower than Shoe Carnival, Inc.'s net income of $14.6M. Notably, Liquidity Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.09x while Shoe Carnival, Inc.'s PE ratio is 9.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidity Services, Inc. is 2.13x versus 0.46x for Shoe Carnival, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQDTLiquidity Services, Inc.2.13x 36.09x $118.1M $7.8M SCVLShoe Carnival, Inc.0.46x 9.10x $297.2M $14.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns LQDT or TILE?
Interface, Inc. has a net margin of 6.62% compared to Liquidity Services, Inc.'s net margin of 12.66%. Liquidity Services, Inc.'s return on equity of 14.33% beat Interface, Inc.'s return on equity of 21%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital LQDTLiquidity Services, Inc.45.55% $0.24 $217.4M TILEInterface, Inc.39.4% $0.78 $1B -
What do Analysts Say About LQDT or TILE?
Liquidity Services, Inc. has a consensus price target of $41.00, signalling upside risk potential of 30.99%. On the other hand Interface, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $33.33 which suggests that it could grow by 16.43%. Given that Liquidity Services, Inc. has higher upside potential than Interface, Inc., analysts believe Liquidity Services, Inc. is more attractive than Interface, Inc..
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings LQDTLiquidity Services, Inc.1 0 0 TILEInterface, Inc.1 0 0 -
Is LQDT or TILE More Risky?
Liquidity Services, Inc. has a beta of 0.987, which suggesting that the stock is 1.297% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Interface, Inc. has a beta of 1.904, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.441%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock LQDT or TILE?
Liquidity Services, Inc. has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Interface, Inc. offers a yield of 0.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Liquidity Services, Inc. pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Interface, Inc. pays out 2.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Interface, Inc.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios LQDT or TILE?
Liquidity Services, Inc. quarterly revenues are $118.1M, which are smaller than Interface, Inc. quarterly revenues of $364.5M. Liquidity Services, Inc.'s net income of $7.8M is lower than Interface, Inc.'s net income of $46.1M. Notably, Liquidity Services, Inc.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 36.09x while Interface, Inc.'s PE ratio is 15.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Liquidity Services, Inc. is 2.13x versus 1.30x for Interface, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income LQDTLiquidity Services, Inc.2.13x 36.09x $118.1M $7.8M TILEInterface, Inc.1.30x 15.68x $364.5M $46.1M
Related Companies
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Did Planet Labs Stock Rally So Much?
Satellite imaging startup Planet Labs (NYSE:PL), after years of disappointing…
Why Did Stan Druckenmiller Sell Broadcom Stock?
In Q3, legendary macro investor Stan Druckenmiller sold his entire…
Stock Ideas
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4.5T
P/E Ratio: 63x
Buy
65
Is GOOG Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
51
Is GOOGL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $4T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Alerts
Buy
100
ATGL alert for Jan 10
Alpha Technology Group Ltd. [ATGL] is up 47.05% over the past day.
Buy
71
NAIL alert for Jan 10
Direxion Daily Homebuilders & Supplies Bull 3X Shs [NAIL] is up 18.52% over the past day.
Buy
54
LGIH alert for Jan 10
LGI Homes, Inc. [LGIH] is up 13.81% over the past day.
