LKFN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 38.14% compared to Lakeland Financial's net margin of 16.32%. Lakeland Financial's return on equity of 15.42% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Lakeland Financial has a consensus price target of $71.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.95%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $50.05 which suggests that it could grow by 16.97%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than Lakeland Financial, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than Lakeland Financial.

Lakeland Financial has a beta of 0.687, which suggesting that the stock is 31.308% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.33%.

Lakeland Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Lakeland Financial pays 50.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lakeland Financial quarterly revenues are $61.2M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Lakeland Financial's net income of $23.3M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Lakeland Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.80x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 12.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeland Financial is 6.90x versus 2.83x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings has a net margin of 38.14% compared to Lakeland Financial's net margin of 32.77%. Lakeland Financial's return on equity of 15.42% beat OptimumBank Holdings's return on equity of 14.69%.

Lakeland Financial has a consensus price target of $71.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.95%. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.76%. Given that OptimumBank Holdings has higher upside potential than Lakeland Financial, analysts believe OptimumBank Holdings is more attractive than Lakeland Financial.

Lakeland Financial has a beta of 0.687, which suggesting that the stock is 31.308% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings has a beta of 0.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.477%.

Lakeland Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. OptimumBank Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lakeland Financial pays 50.24% of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lakeland Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lakeland Financial quarterly revenues are $61.2M, which are larger than OptimumBank Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.1M. Lakeland Financial's net income of $23.3M is higher than OptimumBank Holdings's net income of $3.3M. Notably, Lakeland Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.80x while OptimumBank Holdings's PE ratio is 3.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeland Financial is 6.90x versus 1.13x for OptimumBank Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 38.14% compared to Lakeland Financial's net margin of 27.77%. Lakeland Financial's return on equity of 15.42% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

Lakeland Financial has a consensus price target of $71.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.95%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $181.00 which suggests that it could grow by 4.96%. Given that Park National has higher upside potential than Lakeland Financial, analysts believe Park National is more attractive than Lakeland Financial.

Lakeland Financial has a beta of 0.687, which suggesting that the stock is 31.308% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

Lakeland Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. Park National offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Lakeland Financial pays 50.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lakeland Financial quarterly revenues are $61.2M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. Lakeland Financial's net income of $23.3M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Lakeland Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.80x while Park National's PE ratio is 20.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeland Financial is 6.90x versus 5.63x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 38.14% compared to Lakeland Financial's net margin of 24.66%. Lakeland Financial's return on equity of 15.42% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 9.88%.

Lakeland Financial has a consensus price target of $71.25, signalling upside risk potential of 3.95%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $83.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.77%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Lakeland Financial, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Lakeland Financial.

Lakeland Financial has a beta of 0.687, which suggesting that the stock is 31.308% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.735, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.471%.

Lakeland Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Lakeland Financial pays 50.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 363.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Lakeland Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Tompkins Financial's is not.

Lakeland Financial quarterly revenues are $61.2M, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $75.6M. Lakeland Financial's net income of $23.3M is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $18.6M. Notably, Lakeland Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.80x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 14.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lakeland Financial is 6.90x versus 3.31x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.