JAMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dropbox has a net margin of -7.69% compared to Jamf Holding's net margin of 16.7%. Jamf Holding's return on equity of -9.79% beat Dropbox's return on equity of --.

Jamf Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 60.51%. On the other hand Dropbox has an analysts' consensus of $28.25 which suggests that it could fall by -7.44%. Given that Jamf Holding has higher upside potential than Dropbox, analysts believe Jamf Holding is more attractive than Dropbox.

Jamf Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dropbox has a beta of 0.628, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.228%.

Jamf Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dropbox offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jamf Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dropbox pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jamf Holding quarterly revenues are $159.3M, which are smaller than Dropbox quarterly revenues of $638.8M. Jamf Holding's net income of -$12.2M is lower than Dropbox's net income of $106.7M. Notably, Jamf Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Dropbox's PE ratio is 17.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jamf Holding is 2.95x versus 3.98x for Dropbox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -7.69% compared to Jamf Holding's net margin of -9.14%. Jamf Holding's return on equity of -9.79% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

Jamf Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 60.51%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 93.88%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Jamf Holding, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Jamf Holding.

Jamf Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.116%.

Jamf Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jamf Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jamf Holding quarterly revenues are $159.3M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. Jamf Holding's net income of -$12.2M is lower than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, Jamf Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jamf Holding is 2.95x versus 0.87x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Issuer Direct has a net margin of -7.69% compared to Jamf Holding's net margin of -6.7%. Jamf Holding's return on equity of -9.79% beat Issuer Direct's return on equity of -3.74%.

Jamf Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 60.51%. On the other hand Issuer Direct has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 48.32%. Given that Jamf Holding has higher upside potential than Issuer Direct, analysts believe Jamf Holding is more attractive than Issuer Direct.

Jamf Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Issuer Direct has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.053%.

Jamf Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Issuer Direct offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jamf Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Issuer Direct pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jamf Holding quarterly revenues are $159.3M, which are larger than Issuer Direct quarterly revenues of $7M. Jamf Holding's net income of -$12.2M is lower than Issuer Direct's net income of -$466K. Notably, Jamf Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Issuer Direct's PE ratio is 57.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jamf Holding is 2.95x versus 1.15x for Issuer Direct. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cloudflare has a net margin of -7.69% compared to Jamf Holding's net margin of -3.57%. Jamf Holding's return on equity of -9.79% beat Cloudflare's return on equity of -11.4%.

Jamf Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 60.51%. On the other hand Cloudflare has an analysts' consensus of $97.82 which suggests that it could fall by -11.56%. Given that Jamf Holding has higher upside potential than Cloudflare, analysts believe Jamf Holding is more attractive than Cloudflare.

Jamf Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cloudflare has a beta of 1.099, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.931%.

Jamf Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cloudflare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jamf Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cloudflare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jamf Holding quarterly revenues are $159.3M, which are smaller than Cloudflare quarterly revenues of $430.1M. Jamf Holding's net income of -$12.2M is higher than Cloudflare's net income of -$15.3M. Notably, Jamf Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cloudflare's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jamf Holding is 2.95x versus 23.89x for Cloudflare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.