EGHT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BlackLine has a net margin of 1.69% compared to 8x8's net margin of 33.29%. 8x8's return on equity of -42.11% beat BlackLine's return on equity of 43.72%.

8x8 has a consensus price target of $3.22, signalling upside risk potential of 52.37%. On the other hand BlackLine has an analysts' consensus of $64.80 which suggests that it could grow by 29.11%. Given that 8x8 has higher upside potential than BlackLine, analysts believe 8x8 is more attractive than BlackLine.

8x8 has a beta of 1.776, which suggesting that the stock is 77.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlackLine has a beta of 1.031, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.08%.

8x8 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BlackLine offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 8x8 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BlackLine pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

8x8 quarterly revenues are $178.9M, which are larger than BlackLine quarterly revenues of $169.5M. 8x8's net income of $3M is lower than BlackLine's net income of $56.4M. Notably, 8x8's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BlackLine's PE ratio is 34.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 8x8 is 0.38x versus 5.65x for BlackLine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Five9 has a net margin of 1.69% compared to 8x8's net margin of 4.16%. 8x8's return on equity of -42.11% beat Five9's return on equity of -2.34%.

8x8 has a consensus price target of $3.22, signalling upside risk potential of 52.37%. On the other hand Five9 has an analysts' consensus of $56.05 which suggests that it could grow by 91.16%. Given that Five9 has higher upside potential than 8x8, analysts believe Five9 is more attractive than 8x8.

8x8 has a beta of 1.776, which suggesting that the stock is 77.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Five9 has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.13%.

8x8 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Five9 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 8x8 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Five9 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

8x8 quarterly revenues are $178.9M, which are smaller than Five9 quarterly revenues of $278.7M. 8x8's net income of $3M is lower than Five9's net income of $11.6M. Notably, 8x8's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Five9's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 8x8 is 0.38x versus 2.10x for Five9. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 1.69% compared to 8x8's net margin of 34.62%. 8x8's return on equity of -42.11% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

8x8 has a consensus price target of $3.22, signalling upside risk potential of 52.37%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $506.24 which suggests that it could grow by 29.61%. Given that 8x8 has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe 8x8 is more attractive than Microsoft.

8x8 has a beta of 1.776, which suggesting that the stock is 77.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.215%.

8x8 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. 8x8 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

8x8 quarterly revenues are $178.9M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. 8x8's net income of $3M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, 8x8's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 31.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 8x8 is 0.38x versus 11.15x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zoom Communications has a net margin of 1.69% compared to 8x8's net margin of 31.07%. 8x8's return on equity of -42.11% beat Zoom Communications's return on equity of 11.9%.

8x8 has a consensus price target of $3.22, signalling upside risk potential of 52.37%. On the other hand Zoom Communications has an analysts' consensus of $91.08 which suggests that it could grow by 17.1%. Given that 8x8 has higher upside potential than Zoom Communications, analysts believe 8x8 is more attractive than Zoom Communications.

8x8 has a beta of 1.776, which suggesting that the stock is 77.621% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zoom Communications has a beta of 0.258, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.246%.

8x8 has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zoom Communications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 8x8 pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zoom Communications pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

8x8 quarterly revenues are $178.9M, which are smaller than Zoom Communications quarterly revenues of $1.2B. 8x8's net income of $3M is lower than Zoom Communications's net income of $367.9M. Notably, 8x8's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zoom Communications's PE ratio is 24.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 8x8 is 0.38x versus 5.25x for Zoom Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.