ISBA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) has a net margin of 17.95% compared to Isabella Bank Corp.'s net margin of 15.53%. Isabella Bank Corp.'s return on equity of 8.38% beat Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)'s return on equity of 10.18%.

Isabella Bank Corp. has a consensus price target of $52.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.28%. On the other hand Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Isabella Bank Corp. has higher upside potential than Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania), analysts believe Isabella Bank Corp. is more attractive than Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania).

Isabella Bank Corp. has a beta of 0.115, which suggesting that the stock is 88.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) has a beta of -0.078, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.753%.

Isabella Bank Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Isabella Bank Corp. pays 60.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) pays out 50.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Isabella Bank Corp. quarterly revenues are $29.2M, which are smaller than Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) quarterly revenues of $34.5M. Isabella Bank Corp.'s net income of $5.2M is lower than Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)'s net income of $5.4M. Notably, Isabella Bank Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.68x while Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)'s PE ratio is 15.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Isabella Bank Corp. is 3.44x versus 1.87x for Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts) has a net margin of 17.95% compared to Isabella Bank Corp.'s net margin of 10.27%. Isabella Bank Corp.'s return on equity of 8.38% beat Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts)'s return on equity of 5.75%.

Isabella Bank Corp. has a consensus price target of $52.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.28%. On the other hand Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts) has an analysts' consensus of $83.40 which suggests that it could grow by 9.09%. Given that Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts) has higher upside potential than Isabella Bank Corp., analysts believe Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts) is more attractive than Isabella Bank Corp..

Isabella Bank Corp. has a beta of 0.115, which suggesting that the stock is 88.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts) has a beta of 0.792, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.797%.

Isabella Bank Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts) offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Isabella Bank Corp. pays 60.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts) pays out 50.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Isabella Bank Corp. quarterly revenues are $29.2M, which are smaller than Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts) quarterly revenues of $333.5M. Isabella Bank Corp.'s net income of $5.2M is lower than Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts)'s net income of $34.3M. Notably, Isabella Bank Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.68x while Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts)'s PE ratio is 18.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Isabella Bank Corp. is 3.44x versus 3.16x for Independent Bank Corp. (Massachusetts). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corp. has a net margin of 17.95% compared to Isabella Bank Corp.'s net margin of 8.56%. Isabella Bank Corp.'s return on equity of 8.38% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corp.'s return on equity of 5.54%.

Isabella Bank Corp. has a consensus price target of $52.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.28%. On the other hand Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $35.63 which suggests that it could grow by 21.13%. Given that Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corp. has higher upside potential than Isabella Bank Corp., analysts believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corp. is more attractive than Isabella Bank Corp..

Isabella Bank Corp. has a beta of 0.115, which suggesting that the stock is 88.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corp. has a beta of 0.723, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.656%.

Isabella Bank Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corp. offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Isabella Bank Corp. pays 60.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corp. pays out 10.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Isabella Bank Corp. quarterly revenues are $29.2M, which are smaller than Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corp. quarterly revenues of $112.5M. Isabella Bank Corp.'s net income of $5.2M is lower than Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corp.'s net income of $9.6M. Notably, Isabella Bank Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.68x while Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corp.'s PE ratio is 15.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Isabella Bank Corp. is 3.44x versus 1.20x for Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Parke Bancorp, Inc. has a net margin of 17.95% compared to Isabella Bank Corp.'s net margin of 28.52%. Isabella Bank Corp.'s return on equity of 8.38% beat Parke Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.14%.

Isabella Bank Corp. has a consensus price target of $52.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.28%. On the other hand Parke Bancorp, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Isabella Bank Corp. has higher upside potential than Parke Bancorp, Inc., analysts believe Isabella Bank Corp. is more attractive than Parke Bancorp, Inc..

Isabella Bank Corp. has a beta of 0.115, which suggesting that the stock is 88.536% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parke Bancorp, Inc. has a beta of 0.506, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.406%.

Isabella Bank Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.2%. Parke Bancorp, Inc. offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Isabella Bank Corp. pays 60.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Parke Bancorp, Inc. pays out 31.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Isabella Bank Corp. quarterly revenues are $29.2M, which are smaller than Parke Bancorp, Inc. quarterly revenues of $37.3M. Isabella Bank Corp.'s net income of $5.2M is lower than Parke Bancorp, Inc.'s net income of $10.6M. Notably, Isabella Bank Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.68x while Parke Bancorp, Inc.'s PE ratio is 8.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Isabella Bank Corp. is 3.44x versus 2.16x for Parke Bancorp, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.