ISBA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Customers Bancorp, Inc. has a net margin of 15.78% compared to Isabella Bank Corp.'s net margin of 19.21%. Isabella Bank Corp.'s return on equity of 8.56% beat Customers Bancorp, Inc.'s return on equity of 11.43%.

Isabella Bank Corp. has a consensus price target of $54.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.96%. On the other hand Customers Bancorp, Inc. has an analysts' consensus of $91.44 which suggests that it could grow by 25.34%. Given that Customers Bancorp, Inc. has higher upside potential than Isabella Bank Corp., analysts believe Customers Bancorp, Inc. is more attractive than Isabella Bank Corp..

Isabella Bank Corp. has a beta of 0.120, which suggesting that the stock is 88.049% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Customers Bancorp, Inc. has a beta of 1.654, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.382%.

Isabella Bank Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.14%. Customers Bancorp, Inc. offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Isabella Bank Corp. pays 43.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Customers Bancorp, Inc. pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Isabella Bank Corp.'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Isabella Bank Corp. quarterly revenues are $29.7M, which are smaller than Customers Bancorp, Inc. quarterly revenues of $387.7M. Isabella Bank Corp.'s net income of $4.7M is lower than Customers Bancorp, Inc.'s net income of $74.5M. Notably, Isabella Bank Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.47x while Customers Bancorp, Inc.'s PE ratio is 11.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Isabella Bank Corp. is 3.46x versus 1.65x for Customers Bancorp, Inc.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) has a net margin of 15.78% compared to Isabella Bank Corp.'s net margin of 17.91%. Isabella Bank Corp.'s return on equity of 8.56% beat Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)'s return on equity of 13.35%.

Isabella Bank Corp. has a consensus price target of $54.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.96%. On the other hand Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Isabella Bank Corp. has higher upside potential than Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania), analysts believe Isabella Bank Corp. is more attractive than Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania).

Isabella Bank Corp. has a beta of 0.120, which suggesting that the stock is 88.049% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) has a beta of -0.082, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.15%.

Isabella Bank Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.14%. Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Isabella Bank Corp. pays 43.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) pays out 27.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Isabella Bank Corp. quarterly revenues are $29.7M, which are smaller than Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania) quarterly revenues of $33.7M. Isabella Bank Corp.'s net income of $4.7M is lower than Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)'s net income of $6M. Notably, Isabella Bank Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.47x while Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania)'s PE ratio is 10.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Isabella Bank Corp. is 3.46x versus 1.72x for Franklin Financial Services Corp. (Pennsylvania). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

First United Corp. has a net margin of 15.78% compared to Isabella Bank Corp.'s net margin of 19.42%. Isabella Bank Corp.'s return on equity of 8.56% beat First United Corp.'s return on equity of 12.81%.

Isabella Bank Corp. has a consensus price target of $54.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.96%. On the other hand First United Corp. has an analysts' consensus of $44.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.15%. Given that First United Corp. has higher upside potential than Isabella Bank Corp., analysts believe First United Corp. is more attractive than Isabella Bank Corp..

Isabella Bank Corp. has a beta of 0.120, which suggesting that the stock is 88.049% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First United Corp. has a beta of 0.543, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.703%.

Isabella Bank Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.14%. First United Corp. offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Isabella Bank Corp. pays 43.75% of its earnings as a dividend. First United Corp. pays out 25.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Isabella Bank Corp. quarterly revenues are $29.7M, which are smaller than First United Corp. quarterly revenues of $29.7M. Isabella Bank Corp.'s net income of $4.7M is lower than First United Corp.'s net income of $5.8M. Notably, Isabella Bank Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.47x while First United Corp.'s PE ratio is 9.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Isabella Bank Corp. is 3.46x versus 1.98x for First United Corp.. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont) has a net margin of 15.78% compared to Isabella Bank Corp.'s net margin of 13.82%. Isabella Bank Corp.'s return on equity of 8.56% beat Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont)'s return on equity of 15.12%.

Isabella Bank Corp. has a consensus price target of $54.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.96%. On the other hand Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont) has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Isabella Bank Corp. has higher upside potential than Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont), analysts believe Isabella Bank Corp. is more attractive than Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont).

Isabella Bank Corp. has a beta of 0.120, which suggesting that the stock is 88.049% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont) has a beta of 0.408, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.224%.

Isabella Bank Corp. has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.14%. Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont) offers a yield of 5.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Isabella Bank Corp. pays 43.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont) pays out 59.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Isabella Bank Corp. quarterly revenues are $29.7M, which are larger than Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont) quarterly revenues of $19.9M. Isabella Bank Corp.'s net income of $4.7M is higher than Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont)'s net income of $2.7M. Notably, Isabella Bank Corp.'s price-to-earnings ratio is 20.47x while Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont)'s PE ratio is 13.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Isabella Bank Corp. is 3.46x versus 1.33x for Union Bankshares, Inc. (Vermont). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.